Data.com (discontinued) vs. eGrabber eMail-Prospector

There are many scenarios that make data.com well suited, but most specifically, it works very well when looking for contacts within a certain zip code. You can sort and find information about these contacts and pay by points. This helps because you are able to pick and choose which you want to pay for.

Incentivized

The Tool is best suited for assessing quality of data in terms of the likelihood that you will be able to get in touch with the person. The Tool regularly updates to ensure that there are no issues when working with Linkedin. The customer service team is always available to offer support and regularly provide guidance with updates. The Tool pulls all forms of contact information ranging from contacts' emails to phone number and everything in between. The Tool is highly intuitive and thus, easy to use.

• Data.com is a great way to find out accurate revenue and employee numbers for companies across various industries.
• Data.com's filtering capabilities allow our team to quickly find the ideal prospects to reach out to.
• Data.com, being owned by Salesforce, allows for a seamless integration into our CRM. This saves us an incredible amount of time and ensures data accuracy.

Incentivized

• It is easy to use.
• It scours the internet for data.
• You can usually get the prospect's work email.

Incentivized

• Some contacts can be old. Perhaps they could consider validating some that are older than 5 years.
• They don't always detect duplicate companies. For example, I've added the same company twice before, I don't understand how they allow that, or prevent others from adding duplicates. It doesn't happen very often,, only occasionally.
• Sometimes data.com will "autocorrect" a job title incorrectly. For example, entering "Director of People & Culture" will autocorrect it to "Director of peopleandculture" If you don't catch it, it looks pretty bad for the next person who wants to view the contact.

Incentivized

• I have not found anything that needs to be improved on.

Very intuitive to use and I've never had any confusion with features. Anyone can create an account and use the platform simply by adding a contact or company into the database to earn points. It's a great option if you don't have budget for lists or pay services. It is easy to use and anyone can benefit from it.

Incentivized

Whenever I've had a question their support has responded pretty quickly and gives me exactly what I am looking for. I have not had any technical issues so I can't speak to issues there, but as far as general questions from a free user they have impressed me with how quickly they get back to me and the thoroughness of their answers.

Incentivized

Adobe Workfront may not be the direct competitor of Data.com, but for the services I was using, Workfront looked a little better when it comes to the user interface. But Data.com definitely had more powerful features & better integration capabilities. Also, it was easier to play around with the customer journey in Data.com as compared to other tools I have used in the past.

Incentivized

We have used Atomic Email Hunter for quite a bit, but this is a manual task and takes more time to accomplish the same thing with lower probabilities of success. eGrabber just is a lot more powerful but also a bit more pricy. But to us it is worth its weight in gold.

Incentivized

• The positive impact is gaining more direct contact information for hiring managers.
• Another positive factor is that it is completely free. You gain points for contact information when you add contact information.
• Since it is a free resource, there are no real negative impacts.

Incentivized

• Allowed us to save hours on data mining for a large scale campaign.
• Curated the quality of data for us minimize the time we would've had to take doing that ourselves.