Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.
N/A
Epicor Eclipse
Score 3.1 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Eclipse is an end-to-end business system for wholesale distributors, as well as electrical, HVAC, plumbing and PVF businesses. Eclipse simplifies complex distribution processes found in today’s dynamic supply chains.
N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQ
Epicor Eclipse
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQ
Epicor Eclipse
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQ
Epicor Eclipse
Features
Ridder iQ
Epicor Eclipse
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
18 Ratings
22% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
1.0
10 Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
6.117 Ratings
1.08 Ratings
Plug-ins
5.915 Ratings
1.010 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
8.1
20 Ratings
3% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
3.0
15 Ratings
94% below category average
Single sign-on capability
7.817 Ratings
1.010 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.419 Ratings
5.015 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.4
19 Ratings
1% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
1.0
17 Ratings
152% below category average
Dashboards
7.117 Ratings
1.012 Ratings
Standard reports
6.618 Ratings
1.017 Ratings
Custom reports
8.518 Ratings
1.017 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.5
18 Ratings
16% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
6.4
16 Ratings
18% below category average
Accounts payable
6.818 Ratings
6.016 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.918 Ratings
6.014 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.012 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.211 Ratings
6.07 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.714 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.414 Ratings
6.09 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.314 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
16 Ratings
24% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
3.2
18 Ratings
84% below category average
Inventory tracking
6.316 Ratings
2.018 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.214 Ratings
2.016 Ratings
Location management
5.313 Ratings
2.018 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.7
20 Ratings
1% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
5.0
18 Ratings
44% below category average
Pricing
8.020 Ratings
3.018 Ratings
Order entry
7.819 Ratings
6.018 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.320 Ratings
2.017 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.618 Ratings
5.014 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
5.015 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.6
16 Ratings
28% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
5.9
14 Ratings
23% below category average
Billing Management
7.516 Ratings
5.012 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
6.114 Ratings
5.09 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
4.28 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
4.712 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
Period Close
5.614 Ratings
5.012 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.6
13 Ratings
22% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
6.4
6 Ratings
8% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
5.013 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
6.112 Ratings
5.73 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
5.612 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
6.42 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.4
16 Ratings
25% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
5.6
10 Ratings
22% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
5.210 Ratings
5.07 Ratings
Contract Authoring
5.18 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Contract Repository
4.87 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.810 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Supplier Management
6.016 Ratings
5.05 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.1
7 Ratings
25% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
4.5
4 Ratings
37% below category average
Risk Repository
4.95 Ratings
2.72 Ratings
Control Management
5.35 Ratings
6.22 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
5.54 Ratings
4.51 Ratings
Issue Detection
4.77 Ratings
4.12 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
3.82 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
13 Ratings
6% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
4.2
12 Ratings
47% below category average
Transportation Execution Management
6.412 Ratings
4.07 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.312 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
4.07 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
2.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.7
19 Ratings
5% above category average
Epicor Eclipse
5.0
3 Ratings
38% below category average
Production Process Design
8.116 Ratings
4.52 Ratings
Production Management
7.517 Ratings
5.73 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.117 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Work Execution
7.617 Ratings
5.43 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
7.317 Ratings
4.83 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
16 Ratings
15% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
4.1
14 Ratings
55% below category average
Forecasting
6.213 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.516 Ratings
5.012 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
6.015 Ratings
2.010 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.4
11 Ratings
29% below category average
Epicor Eclipse
6.2
7 Ratings
15% below category average
Proposal Management
5.110 Ratings
5.93 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
5.611 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
8.5
3 Ratings
15% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.73 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
9 Ratings
28% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
6.86 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
7.26 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
6.26 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
7.75 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Eclipse is well suited for quick order entry where the source is a formal purchase order document or a phone call with a known customer. In these scenarios the order entry process is quick, and order processing is smooth even if the customer has a lot of "special" requests like shipping part today and holding the rest or shipping some of the order to other addresses. Eclipse also works well if you have a good database of products, especially in searching for products where only partial information is known or finding existing orders where all you know for sure is the customer. It is not particularly well suited for Point of Sale where a walk-in customer who doesn't have an account wants products for which part numbers are not known, due to the requirements to release an order for a customer with no credit.
Sales Order tracking, even returns are strengths of Epicor Eclipse. It can be set up to match returns to previous orders so that the correct credits are applied. It is capable of setting up contract pricing as well as matrix level pricing according to sales velocity or individual customer buyer programs.
Purchasing can be set up to work by full line buys or short buys while still maintaining a balanced inventory level of vendor line product.
Vendor Invoices and purchase orders are easily matched up for payment and the diverse reporting features are able to provide multi-faceted views of Product Sales, Items with No Sales, or Sales or Purchasing trends, just to name a few.
It is also tracking warehouse operation in both RF and non-RF environments, or a combination of the two.
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
I use it every day and can't see a reason why I would stop unless I started a new job. If I were to leave my present position, the new job would be much more attractive if they were Eclipse users.
The working environment can be perfectly designed for every user and department, which makes the user-friendliness very good. Adding columns, formatting tables can all be customized to the user. Dutch Translation: De werkomgeving is perfect in te richten voor elke gebruiker en afdeling, wat de gebruiksvriendelijkheid zeer hoog maakt. Het toevoegen van kolommen en het opmaken van tabellen is allemaal aanpasbaar aan de gebruiker.
This is very easy to use for someone that hasn't ever used the system before. Despite any preconceived notions about how a system should function they can learn this and become efficient with really not a lot of effort. I have used many systems and this is probably one of the easiest I have ever had to learn to navigate and use.
I haven't experienced any outages in the two years I have been using the system. It is always available as long as the computer is up. The only time I have seen it not be available was on occasions where we lost internet, or power and then we lost access to everything, not just Epicor Eclipse.
Everything in this system moves fairly quickly, that may be in part because we are a small company with only 21 users on the system at a time, or it may just be a the way the Epicor Eclipse works for any size company with any number of users. I can only speak for what I know and say that it is fast for our purposes.
The tier 1 support is trying, and sometimes they are successful. Sometimes they aren't. This topic isn't as black and white as the questions might suggest. Currently their Tier 1 support team is over seas, all items automatically go to Tier 1 and then when they can't help they either escalate it or tell me they need to check with someone else and they will get back to me. If they escalate me to Tier 2, then the issue comes back to the States and the support is usually at a higher knowledge/experience level and it can get resolved fairly quickly. If they don't escalate, then it might take weeks and multiple follow ups on my part before I either get a satisfactory resolution or finally get escalated.
The training classes that I have attended have been top notch. The presenters are extremely knowledgeable on their subject matter, including real-world application of the system. They aren't just software techs training end users, they seem to be end users that have become experts in the over functionality and capabilities of the system.
The on-line training is very good, and it is taught by the same people that do the live in-person training sessions. The difficult part of it is, asking questions about your specific company's nuances or special circumstances. I don't remember if you can access the on-line training sessions after you have taken them for reminders purposes, but if so that is a great asset.
I don't really know about the implementation, it was back in 1998 and I didn't start here until 2016. By the time I started here they had been running it for a number of years and most of the people that were here when it was implemented are no longer here, and the ones that are don't really have much to say about how the implementation went either bad or good.
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but Prophet 21 is going to get you there much quicker and with the kind of insight into your business that will help you thrive.
I don't really know about the scalability. It's the same as it was when I started, I do know that you can buy more user licenses, but I think they come in packs of 5, which can be a problem if you only need 1 and will never use the other 4. But, again I'm not sure on that.
One of the main positive ROI impacts has been the constant upgrading and adding of new features to keep the software user friendly, relative, and robust.
Our credit manager has said it has made their job easier with daily reports to catch pricing discrepancies and straighten out before they go to invoice makes us look better.
With the addition of sale analytics it has given our sales force tools and new approaches to our customer base which has raised profitability.