TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Figma

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AFigma, headquartered in San Francisco, offers their collaborative design and prototyping application to support digital product and UI development.

    $15

    per month per editor

    Freehand by InVision

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AFreehand, from InVision headquartered in New York, is an online whiteboard that enables teams to plan, brainstorm, and draw together. It aims to give everyone a simple way to visually represent ideas with charts, diagrams, and drawings. Whether for mind mapping, creating a customer journey map, or drafting up an org chart, Freehand can help teams make ideas and plans visual.

    $4

    per month per user

    Pricing
    FigmaFreehand by InVision
    Editions & Modules
    Professional
    $144
    per year
    Organization
    $540
    per year
    Starter
    Free
    Freehand Free
    $0
    per year per user
    Freehand Pro
    $4
    per month per user
    Freehand Enterprise
    Custom Quote
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigmaFreehand by InVision
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigmaFreehand by InVision
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    Chose Figma
    Figma is by far the best prototyping tool out there. I am such a fan of this tool.
    Incentivized
    Chose Figma
    Figma is a one stop tool which has all the functionality over using multiple tools
    Incentivized
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I actually have access to all three. And I use all three for different things, though truthfully, I could probably get away with just using Figma. I'm not sure how InVision Freehand is better than Miro or Figma. But we already own it, so it has made sense for me to use it in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    InVision Freehand is closing the gap and adding all the functionalities that some of these tools provide separately. In the race towards a one-stop digital design ecosystem, InVision Freehand is well poised to deliver and connect where others can't. I hope that with the news of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    Our UX/UI designers prefer inVision and believe it is easier to use than Figma, which we sometimes also look into.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I personally like InVision Freehand better than Figma because the templates are better and the tools are easier to use. specifically, InVision Freehand's boxes are easier to drag and text is easier to format. so this is why I choose InVision Freehand over Figma. but our company …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    InVision Freehand is simple to use and doesn't have all the bells and whistles Figma offers - and its simplicity has a place in the workspace tech stack. We haven't tried Figma Jam yet - even though we use Figma, we still prefer Invision.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    Figma is far superior. They have templates and great video integration. The template portion is the best. You can choose from many and even have a network of others that are creating templates for people to use. I am sure InVision Freehand has a lot of the same features, but …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    They seem quite similar in a lot of ways but I tend to slightly prefer Invision overall. Seems like it is easier to use and offers much of the same feature set. If it were up to me I'd probably just use InVision Freehand going forward and stop using Figma altogether.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    The two other platforms that people have tried to get us to use are Figma and Miro. Since we have been using InVision Freehand it works much better for our teams and is within the InVision environment that we are familiar with. The InVision Freehand tools and user interface are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    Feels better and more intuitive than Miro, however, FigJam would be my ultimate go-to just because Figma is the software that I am most familiar with. Figma has design, prototyping, and now the collaboration feature, so if I was deciding on the software for collaboration I …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    It has robust functionality.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I love it way better than all the other ones I tried.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    Because I feel it is more accessible and much simpler to use, the interface is very intuitive and this helps you to use it without experience
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    The sharing/accessibility of the mocks. It’s hard for someone not on the design team to see their mocks unless the links were shared but this might be by design or license based.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    Freehand is the least polished of the bunch. It doesn't instantly make your thoughts and design look sexy. It doesn't open up your designs to be edited live, inspected, and sliced up for export. It doesn't let you interact with flow charts, like showing or hiding long pieces of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    InVision Freehand is lacking in features compared to competitors like MURAL and Miro, but its streamlined, easy-to-use interface makes it easy to pick up and throw something together in an instant. It does not do large complex work as well as its competitors, but InVision …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I didn't make the decision to purchase InVision Freehand vs Miro. If given the choice I would have chosen Miro. Miro has features that are more intuitive and automated. The product is just easier to use. InVision Freehand gets the job done and what makes it stand apart is its …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I have found that between freehand InVision Freehand, Miro, MURAL and FigJam, each product does certain things differently. Some of those products execute certain features better than others. One benefit to InVision freehand is that it's sometimes nice to have all of your messy …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    The visual style of Freehand was very appealing and tools were intuitive to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    These products are very similar. MURAL seems to have more fun characters.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I find the sketching ability a lot easier on InVision Freehand. I find I can move faster and get my ideas across clearer. FigJam offers too many small line options. I often waste time trying to customize my pencil to sketch. In InVision Freehand, it's the perfect balance of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I do like how InVision has so many more features than FigJam does keeping it well ahead as a virtual whiteboard and collaboration software. At the moment there are not enough features in FigJam to create an entire team switch to FigJam. I do like how easy it is to share FigJam. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    We started using InVision Freehand for Sketch prototyping, it was easy to prototype images designed in the Sketch app. We use it for conducting remote workshops and creating journey maps
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    The entire team uses it to create mockups and wireframing and also uses it to present to the business.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    InVision Freehand is still better for communication with cross-functional team
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    Miro is more structured, but it's another tool, another login, another purchase for our organization and we want a one-size-fits-all solution that allows us to keep all projects in one place for easier reference.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    204 Answers
    88%
    Would buy again
    90 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    179 Answers
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    61 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    198 Answers
    87%
    Happy with the feature set
    89 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    99%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    123 Answers
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    37 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    142 Answers
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    54 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    FigmaFreehand by InVision
    Small Businesses
    Proto.io
    Score7 out of 10
    Whimsical
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    UXPin
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Whimsical
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Marvel
    Score9 out of 10
    Whimsical
    Score9.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigmaFreehand by InVision
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (209 ratings)
    7.9
    (102 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    8.0
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (41 ratings)
    7.5
    (16 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    8.3
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.1
    (17 ratings)
    9.4
    (6 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigmaFreehand by InVision
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    I would recommend if you need to start from scratch a product UI or any customer journey that you need to implement that requires designing and visualizing different steps to complete a process. I would recommend that any design/UI/UX team brainstorm and make proposals that they can compare and discuss in a visual way.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    InVision Freehand has quickly evolved to be a very robust solution for our pre-design process and collaboration with stakeholders and other product teams. It has brought a lot more hands-on workshopping opportunities and created engaging spaces for cross functional teams. Internally to our design org we are able to prototype ideas faster and generate insights or changes BEFORE going into more hi-fidelity design tools or processes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • Figma allows us to create universal content. This means that if multiple designers want to re-use a piece of content, and if everyone's content should be dynamically updated from time to time, we can easily accomplish this by turning design elements into a universal instance. Then, if an update is needed, we can push the change out to all assets at once. It's very efficient and ensures we're all updating content accordingly.
    • Figma also allows us to set parameters for the company's brand guide and share them across various designers. This way, we can easily pull from approved brand fonts, colors, and more, which allows our assets to remain unified across multiple touchpoints.
    • Figma also allowed us to create and install our own plugin, which we use to export every slide we have in a frame at one time, versus the default export feature, which limits you to one slice at a time. This is particularly useful for us when we're working on email templates, since we tend to have a ton of slices in any given series.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    • Bring in and embed external files and view them on the board without having to move out of freehand. eg. pdf's, power point, youtube etc.
    • Creating wireframes, flow maps, all and any kinds of created art boards to share with team members.
    • Ability to create text and link to external sites
    • Can format and create pages with text and bullet points right in freehand, rather than having to go to another software to do the same.
    • Collaborate with Team members all on the same board and project at the same time and get feedback live in a meeting and/or even later.
    • Love the different templates that have been provided for me to use as a starting point.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • It will be great if Figma will consider having the Pages where interactions can be stitched together among the Pages and not just one page with so many Frames to create the stand-alone clickable prototype that can be used to simulate the intended UX
    • Bring back the Inspect Mode tab right on the right-side panel of the main workspace instead of hiding behind the Dev Mode.
    • Figma Slides feature could be improved quite a bit more in order to be easier to assemble slides into a presentation deck and having pre-built templates for slides can be useful too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    • The resolution: Our webpage designs always pass the resolution threshold to where freehand starts to work its compression. During presentations, it can be a little embarrassing when we can't read the copy because it looks like potatoes.
    • Embedding videos: GIFs are only good to a certain point, and creating Vimeo embeds is tedious. I wish I could embed MP4s or web assets a lot quicker.
    • Touchpad panning: I can't tell you how many times I've "gone back" in my browser when I'm just trying to pan across the freehand. Has honestly made me wanna force quit on many occasions.
    • Sticky notes and text in shapes: Overall, it's really hard to use the sticky notes and text inside rectangles without the text just getting all over the place. It's different sizes, it gets too tiny, it gets way too big, and overall, it just doesn't look professional, even with a lot of fussing.
    • No ability to crop/mask an image. Nice to have, but sometimes we just need to delete a chunk off a screenshot, and it requires opening PS or taking a screenshot to edit anything.
    • Wish there was a way to have "internal comments" that are not visible to our clients.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Figma
    Figma is a pretty cool tool in many areas. My team almost uses it on daily basis, such as, brainstorming on product/design topics, discussing prototypes created by designers. We even use it for retrospectives, which is super convenient and naturally keeps records of what the team discusses every month. Furthermore, I do see the potential of the product - currently we mainly use it for design topics, but it seems it is also a good fit for tech diagrams, which we probably will explore further in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Honestly as in any organization it's up to budget. I feel like every organization I go to I'm constantly striving to keep InVision as part of the main funded tools used by the team especially in a remote environment. I feel there is a push to move to Figma and Zooms new white boarding tool but I'm still not a fan of Zoom's tool. Microsoft also created a white boarding tool which has been buggy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Figma
    There's a bit of a learning curve, but generally I think it's both more powerful and intuitive that other UX design tools. Most of what I need to do as a designer can be done in this platform, from basic wireframes to creating a design system, to creating pixel perfect designs, to prototyping to dev handoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Color Selection can be tricky when changing colors for shapes and text I've seen other users struggle with creating sticky notes and getting text to fit in the box properly and had to abandon the tool for a workshop for this reason After having a demo, I learned of new features I wasn't using. I don't know it would have been intuitive to find on my own.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Figma
    The only regret I have is, its not available when there is no internet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    For availability, we never have to even think about whether inVision Freehand is going to be available for us to work with. There has never been a time when we have opened up the application and had any issues of any kind. I can't imagine why anyone would work with a platform that is unreliable. inVision Freehand is realibel, stable, and getting better all the time. Whether it's their built-in tools or the expanding of Templates to work with Freehand has been a reliable go-to platform for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Figma
    I think its great, As there are many other software or systems which can be integrated with it as plugins or API's
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    It is a little slow when bringing artboards from Sketch to Freehand using Craft. I have had some issues loading and redrawing pages when I have a lot of images on my freehand board. It gives me an error message while I am in the file and starts to reload and redraw all the photos again. Not sure if it has a limit on how many images it can handle on a board at a time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Figma
    I haven't used their support lately but in the past, they had a chat that I used often. They often responded in a few hours and were able to give a satisfactory solution. I would imagine it's less personal now but the community has expanded drastically so there are more resources out there to self serve with a bit of Google magic.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    I haven't had to use the support team for anything, which is great news because that means the product usually works as expected! In terms of online support, I've been able to find videos that show how new features work. Also, many of the people I work with have experience with the tools so they are a great resource for me.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Figma
    In-person training has its own benefits - 1. It helps in resolving queries then and there during the training. 2. I find classroom or in-person training more interactive. 3. Classroom or in-person training could be more practical in nature where participants can have an hands on experience with tools and clarify their doubts with the trainer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Figma
    Online training has its own merits and demerits - 1. Sometimes we may face issues with connectivity or the training content 2. The way training is being delivered becomes very important because not everyone is comfortable taking online training and learning by themselves. 3. With the advancement of technology online training has become popular but there is a segment of people who still prefer class-room training over online one.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    InVisionApp Inc.
    The implementation is pretty much easy-peasy and plug-n-play. We simply download the applications and install, signed in and were good to go. I really cannot imagine that there would be anyone who would have any difficulty whatsoever in getting started in more than just a few minutes. It's really how implementing these officewide improvements should always go.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    Miro is more user-friendly than Figma, but is less robust in terms of web prototyping and graphic design. While Figma isn't made to be used as a design tool, our team has taken to using it as such because it's richer in functions and personalizations compared to Miro and Figma.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Miro (formerly Realtime Board) is the original product concept for this tool and I used it for 3-4 years for product development. Invision is aesthetically a carbon copy of the tool but lacks in fine usability controls. We actually didn't choose Freehand, it just came as an added tool under our Invision subscription. It's helpful but knowing the previous tool, it's been a hard sell because it's just not as good. Again, it's really fine tuned usability things like navigation, zoom, switching from tool to tool, selecting and deselecting, etc
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Getting set up with inVision Freehand was super simple. We figured how many of our team members were going to be using it and we set up our account knowing that. There were no negotiations, contract hassles or anything that would have been a waste of our time, efforts or resources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Figma
    I think this is great and as I mentioned at ADP we use Figma extensively whether by designers, researchers or content writers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Not everyone in the company has access to Invision, and they can't view the links I provide to them. I also wish everyone could view a file without logging in to the enterprise account. It comes in handy when I am doing focus-group studies or other studies with our customers that don't have Freehand. Unfortunately, if that is possible, I don't know how to do that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    InVisionApp Inc.
    We didn't use an outside vendor - that's why I gave this option a 10.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • Allows us to get funding for further phases of the project (which is uncountable)
    • Well, it lets us show off when needed due to well suited UI-oriented character
    • Easily approachable by anyone (browser use)
    • User friendly interface
    • More advanced cooperation requires some of the users to have a license
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    InVisionApp Inc.
    • Positives all around. Everyone is able to see and collaborate.
    • Granting access is sometimes a pain. Sending the link does not always work, and I get emails as people try to access boards.
    • No negatives really, I love learning all of the different ways it can be used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots