FileHold Document Management vs. ProcessMaker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileHold Document Management | Score7.7 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | FileHold is a document and records management software. FileHold is integrated with both Microsoft Office and Microsoft Teams and provides secure single log in to both FileHold and Office 365. FileHold can be deployed on a customers own servers or private cloud or hosted by FileHold on the Azure Cloud Standard features include; document scanning, version control, search, tagging, full user audit trail, archiving and scheduled disposition. Out of the box, users can search the FileHold… | $30 per month per seat |
ProcessMaker | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences. | N/A |
| FileHold Document Management | ProcessMaker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | In all cases the price per user will decrease as more users are added to the system. FileHold has many optional and custom features that can be chosen and will change the price. For outright purchase of a license there is an optional 20% per year support and upgrade fee. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | ProcessMaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 60% Would buy again 3 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 60% Happy with the feature set 3 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| FileHold Document Management | ProcessMaker | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customization |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reporting & Analytics |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Process Engine |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Business Process Automation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FileHold Document Management | ProcessMaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | Bizagi Score8.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileHold Document Management | ProcessMaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.2 |
| Usability | 6.0 | 6.6 |
| Performance | 7.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 6.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | - | 7.6 |
| FileHold Document Management | ProcessMaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileHold Document Management Screenshots |








