TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Forms

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Forms is an app for creating forms and surveys, and is part of Google Apps for Work. The product focuses on ease of use; the interface is similar to a document editor, with drop down lists of options and drag and drop question re-ordering. Users can embed images and video into surveys. Users can also program the question flow with custom logic. Google sends users basic summaries of the survey results automatically, or users can export the raw survey results data and analyze it via…N/A

    Oracle CPQ

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.

    $240

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Google FormsOracle CPQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    CPQ Pricing
    $240.00
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google FormsOracle CPQ
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google FormsOracle CPQ
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    64 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    65 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    60 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    42 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    48 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Google FormsOracle CPQ
    Survey Format & Appearance
    Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Google Forms and Oracle CPQ
    Feature
    Google Forms
    6.7
    123 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Survey templates7.7114 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themes6.2112 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom logo/branding6.1100 Ratings00 Ratings
    Survey Content
    Comparison of Survey Content features of Google Forms and Oracle CPQ
    Feature
    Google Forms
    8.0
    121 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Changes to live survey8.9115 Ratings00 Ratings
    Question design help7.398 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple question types7.9120 Ratings00 Ratings
    Survey Logic
    Comparison of Survey Logic features of Google Forms and Oracle CPQ
    Feature
    Google Forms
    7.0
    110 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Survey logic flexibility7.0110 Ratings00 Ratings
    Survey Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Google Forms and Oracle CPQ
    Feature
    Google Forms
    8.4
    122 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Response tracking8.3120 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data export8.1116 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports7.9113 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.286 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics8.594 Ratings00 Ratings
    Survey Administration & Security
    Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Google Forms and Oracle CPQ
    Feature
    Google Forms
    7.9
    116 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Access controls7.8113 Ratings00 Ratings
    Compliance7.990 Ratings00 Ratings
    Survey Distribution
    Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Google Forms and Oracle CPQ
    Feature
    Google Forms
    7.6
    90 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Vendor-offered crowdsourcing7.842 Ratings00 Ratings
    Respondent restrictions7.588 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ
    Comparison of CPQ features of Google Forms and Oracle CPQ
    Feature
    Google Forms
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle CPQ
    6.7
    18 Ratings
    26% below category average
    Quote sharing/sending00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
    Product configuration00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
    Configuration options00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
    Pricing rules00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
    Price adjustment00 Ratings5.017 Ratings
    Purchase history and open contracts00 Ratings6.016 Ratings
    Guided selling/Sales portal00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
    CPQ reporting & analytics00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
    CPQ-CRM integration00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
    Attachments to quotes00 Ratings5.017 Ratings
    Order capturing00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google FormsOracle CPQ
    Small Businesses
    Jotform
    Score8.5 out of 10
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Qualaroo
    Score7 out of 10
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    QuestionPro
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Agentforce Revenue Management
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google FormsOracle CPQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.3
    (127 ratings)
    1.0
    (45 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.0
    (26 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (67 ratings)
    3.0
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (49 ratings)
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    2.0
    (6 ratings)
    Configurability
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google FormsOracle CPQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Google Forms is great for simple surveys, such as quick polls, but any logic beyond conditional pages is not supported. Google Forms is best used when the survey participants have and are permitted to use a Google Account to fill out the form; we ran into issues with hospital IT departments. I don't believe there's a better free tool out there than Google Forms, though.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Live results: When a user completes the form the results are added instantly.
    • Easy to create: Google Forms has a simple interface that allows for a wide range of question types. Google will even try to guess the question type based on the question (but this can be overridden).
    • Answers export to Google Sheets: It is easy to have each response to your form add a row to a Google Sheet, allowing for further analysis or processing.
    • Ability to automatically collect email addresses within a domain: If you have a form that has been shared with users in your domain, you can set it to automatically collect the users' email addresses without them needing to type it in. Makes checking whether all students have completed the form easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
    • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
    • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Sometimes finding the output -- a Google Sheet with all responses-- is a little difficult. It's also sometimes confusing to figure out how to get back into the Google Form Survey itself.
    • As always, sharing among an institutional Google account and your personal Google account can be frustrating. You have to make a copy and can't share across the two different accounts very easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
    • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
    • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    I will definitely renew my use of Google Forms because I really like the ease of use and the number of tools that Google forms provide. I also love that I can administer a test in real-time and get results in a timely manner
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    Overall ease of use for staff, volunteers, and adult learners, and easy to get reports and to share reports via Sheets. As a free tool, it does more than expected. Easy to change the look and brand it to your organization, or just make it more fun, depending on what you want to use it for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Google
    In the years I've used GoogleForms I've never ran into any issues with the reliability or availability. Google is a gigantic company with essentially limitless resources which makes it very easy to trust that I will continue to be able to enjoy the same reliability I've come to know and expect from GoogleForms
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
    Read full review
    Performance
    Google
    One of the things that comes as a benefit of the lack to create complex logic branching and truly custom design is that there isn't lot of room to bog down the software. GoogleForms has always loaded just as fast as my internet service and device would allow it. I'm not sure about front end integrations or integrations into the form itself, as I've never explored it, but on the backend, I've never had any issues with integrations channeling from GoogleForms from the GoogleForms's end of things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    We haven't used much official support for Google Forms. However, because it is so widely used, there are a ton of articles and guides available online to help administrators of varying technical abilities to work through problems that arise. Additionally, Google provides an official support forum where there are discussions with other users as well as Google developers that can help address issues if needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    Google Forms doesn't really require "implementation": simply log into GDrive and create a survey! You can configure settings per survey to, for example, automatically write responses to a GSheet.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.

    Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.

    EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.

    The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.

    Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Although both platforms offer similar functionalities, Google Form has a personal advantage and it is the impeccable integration with the different applications of the Google suite, this allows to make use of all of them in a transparent way, which in the work environment allows to perform work efficiently and without affecting the quality of it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Google
    GoogleForms lacks the ability for complex logic branching and the ability to truly design it in a custom manner. It's pretty obvious when you land on a GoogleForm that it is in fact a GoogleForm. This rating solely reflects the lack of flexibility which in turn makes it something that wouldn't usually be scaled. That being said, if needing to scale a simple solution, GoogleForms would be up for the job.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • High positive impact and return of investment; easy to use and seamlessly integrated with current Google Drive and Suite
    • Ability to create surveys on demand and quickly, saving time and energy
    • Easy to train others in using Google Forms so that there is not a bottleneck of knowledge
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
    • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
    • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots