Hire, by Google, was a recruiting app for G suite customers. The product includes functionality for applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, and candidate sourcing. Google sunsetted the product in late 2020.
N/A
SnapSurveys
Score7.8 out of 10
N/A
Snap Surveys offers both Survey Software and Feedback Management Solutions, including desktop survey software, online feedback management solutions, and survey research services. Snap Surveys offers complete tools for survey design, administration, data collection, and analysis. Snap Surveys supports all survey modes, including: Online, Mobile (including iPad/iPhone/Android), Paper, Kiosk, Phone, Scanning, and Tablet PC, in any language with robust analysis and reporting capabilities,…
$695
per year
Pricing
Hire by Google (discontinued)
SnapSurveys
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Online/Mobile
$695
per year
Paper Scanning
$2,395
per year
Paper Scanning - Perpetual License
3,995
Online/Mobile - Perpetual License
5,995
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hire by Google (discontinued)
SnapSurveys
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Hire by Google (discontinued)
SnapSurveys
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SnapSurveys
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
8.1
1 Ratings
2% above category average
SnapSurveys
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SnapSurveys
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Survey templates
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Themes
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SnapSurveys
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Changes to live survey
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Question design help
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Multiple question types
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SnapSurveys
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Survey logic flexibility
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SnapSurveys
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Response tracking
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data export
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Analytics
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SnapSurveys
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
SnapSurveys
8.0
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Access controls
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Compliance
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and SnapSurveys
Google Hire is very good at doing the basics well. I believe for most internal HR departments at small companies, this is all you need. It also works well for small to medium-sized staffing companies that just want something reliable and easy to use. What Google Hire doesn't do very well is be flexible. They don't have custom options, they don't have a ton of settings, and their development cycle is slow. As a result, it's pretty much what you see is what you get.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think it is very important to go through their training videos and user guides. Devote the time to learning it correctly from the beginning. In the long run you will enjoy it much more than plowing right into it and then trying to find out if you did it right. Also, while you are not required to buy the annual maintenance contract, I think if you are going to use the program, don't skimp, buy the annual maintenance contract. The free technical support is necessary, especially when you are up against deadlines.
Google does search well so when I search through our database for candidates, I'm confident that I'm pulling up all the right people from what we have.
They have a modern and nice user interface - this is one of the biggest reasons to use it over other systems, as most ATS' are pretty ancient looking and not very pleasant to use.
Their support is very good at answering and addressing questions.
Their pricing is incredible. I'm sure at some point it will change, but for small companies paying 100+ per user for other ATS' - it's incredible to pay 100/month for the whole company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Despite many many months of requests, Google still hasn't implemented ANY custom fields. This makes it tough for an external recruiting firm to track what they want (most importantly: desired salary).
The job board integration is not great for external recruiters, mostly at the fault of Indeed. Indeed flagged us as a recruiting firm and so none of our jobs actually go live. While I know this is an Indeed problem (we had the same problem when using Bullhorn), Breezy ATS never has that problem for us so I don't know what they're doing differently.
Their development cycles are quite frankly very slow. I've requested some features, and while support is great about telling me it's coming or in the pipeline, I honestly don't really see a difference in the product since we started using it. It's still great to use, and we still love the software, but there haven't been too many visible improvements that make any difference to our work.
Being Google, it can sometimes be frustrating that one arm doesn't talk to the other. For example, they announced a Gmail for Works App/Extension integration, but for some reason when they launched it, admins of a domain couldn't install it. Google Hire pointed to the Google for Works team, and it took literally months to fix. Not the end of the world, but just very silly considering they're the same company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think as an organization there is always room to grow, however, this application has really helped us with our dilemma with offline, online, and paper surveys. We are able to make our surveys fun and engaging and the interface for the person creating the survey is user-friendly. Customer service is very helpful if you need additional support.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I picked Google Hire after spending about 3 months on Bullhorn. I found Bullhorn to be terrible. It's WAY more customizable and theoretically powerful, but it's also a pain to set up and maintain. Even just getting your job page set up on your own site required tech support. Getting it eventually to what you want could be a great benefit, but Google Hire does great right out of the box and is a lot cheaper. Breezy HR is a great system. It's a bit more expensive than Google Hire for multiple job postings, but their system is equally easy to use and straight forward. However, we are all in on Google Products, so it was just a no brainer to go with Hire for a better price and most likely a better search function.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is an in between option. The options we evaluated were Qualtrics and SurveyGizmo. It's cheaper than Qualtrics and easier to design surveys than SurveyGizmo. Nonetheless it's not the worst option out there like SurveyMonkey.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google Hire makes, unfortunately, a very little impact on our ROI, but I think in the ATS world that's a good thing. It simply acts as a record that we can put everything in and easily reference, and the fact that it works overall makes it a positive software product in the long run.
While the search works great, I don't know that I've ever specifically found a candidate and placed them due to it. That could be a result of our job reqs though.
The biggest most obvious impact is really just the price. We needed a tool that does what Google Hire does, reliably. Most other companies charge at least 150 or so for 2 people, whereas Google Hire is 100/month for many users. It gives us flexibility for the future and helps minimize what could be a big expense. That definitely helps our bottom line.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info