Google offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.
N/A
Vero Cloud
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Vero Workflows is an email marketing solution built to make customer engagement simpler with features such as in-app behavior tracking, audience segmentation, and workflow automation.
$54
per month
Pricing
Google Optimize
Vero Cloud
Editions & Modules
Google Optimize
Free
Starter
$54
per month
Pro
$219
per month
Growth
$549
per month
Enterprise
$1,429
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Optimize
Vero Cloud
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
15% discount applied with an annual subscription, paid upfront.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Optimize
Vero Cloud
Features
Google Optimize
Vero Cloud
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
4.9
8 Ratings
52% below category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
4.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
2.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
4.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
1.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
6.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
2.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
1.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
3.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
2.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
5.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
3.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
8.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
6.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
2.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
7.0
8 Ratings
22% below category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
7.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
8.2
8 Ratings
5% below category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
7.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
9.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
9.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Google Optimize
-
Ratings
Vero Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
1% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
It is a little too limited for a full stack experimentation programme. Many times we required development support or tech advise but we were simply unable to get this due to it being google. This was a big problem for us. However it is quite good if you were looking to get started in experimentation and didn’t have the budgets for a wider tool
Vero tends to play nice with companies that have their websites as the primary source of truth. This allows them to send as many events as they need and develop more complex workflows that introduce conditionality into Vero emails. However, for those that rely more on Salesforce, it might have more limited applications. The product is fairly easy to use, so it's easy for multiple people on the team to pick it up and do what they need for their respective groups. On the other hand, creating email templates will require some knowledge of HTML/CSS, unless those are copied from another source. That would require another product of course that provides more robust layout editing features and templates.
Easy to follow set up procedures. Once I walk a client through the process, it's effortless for them to emulate on subsequent tests.
Lots of geo and user attribute customization features to be able to drill down into specific targeted audiences — all based on the power of Google's immense data system.
Google Optimize is the logical choice for many people to start with since most are already familiar with and using GA.
While Vero offers some WYSIWYG editing, it's on the limited side, as it mostly allows you to edit copy, but not necessarily the layout.
The UI/UX has improved dramatically over the course of the last few years, but it can still lag from time to time and experience sluggishness.
While reliability is really good, it does have lapses from time to time that will introduce delays into emails being sent out. Once or twice, the system went completely down for a period of time.
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites total traffic. Should integrate form analysis, heatmap, and page analytics.
Vero's price tag is far more attractive but for what you will find to be clear and obvious reasons. Vero has no CRM unlike HubSpot and Infusionsoft. Vero also has limited tracking unlike the seemingly endless possibilities offered from HubSpot which as we all know comes with at a significant cost, often not feasible by a small startup company.
The overall costs of using Vero have been much lower than using two comparable products that handle transactional emails and newsletters, respectively. MailChimp has relatively recently integrated their Mandrill product for transactional emails, so that's worth looking at as well.
Using a single product for many things lowers the learning curve, as team members only have to learn one product well, rather than several.
While infrequent, Vero's outages have impacted our operations at times. If absolute reliability is crucial to your business, then you may have to find a larger provider with a more robust infrastructure. As mentioned, though, it hasn't been a big problem for us.