Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Sheets
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Google Sheets is the spreadsheet app available on Google Workspace, or standalone, with a free plan for personal use and accessible via mobile apps for iOS and Android.N/A
MongoDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
MongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster.
$0
per month
SQLite
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SQLite is an in-process library that implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine. The code for SQLite is in the public domain and is thus free for use for any purpose, commercial or private. SQLite is one of the most widely deployed databases in the world.N/A
Pricing
Google SheetsMongoDBSQLite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Shared
$0
per month
Serverless
$0.10million reads
million reads
Dedicated
$57
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google SheetsMongoDBSQLite
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google SheetsMongoDBSQLite
Considered Multiple Products
Google Sheets
Chose Google Sheets
It's easyest, fully online and fast to start. This is why I always use this tool to do something fast. Something that make it better than Excel as far as I know is the capability to connect to REST api and fetch data easily.
Chose Google Sheets
It's online and easy to use. I know Excel is online too, but it comes with a package, whereas Google gave it for free. Even its free version is out of bounds and can do whatever there is. Great part about this is, it doesn't matter if the data is from XLXS or CSV if you don't …
Chose Google Sheets
In some ways, SeaTable and AirTable provide a little more functionality beyond what Google Sheets provides. It is a little easier to set up different views of different types, not just table formats. They also make it easier to make groups and subgroups with the data set …
Chose Google Sheets
Apple Numbers and Microsoft Excel
Chose Google Sheets
Although I use Google Sheets more often than I use Microsoft Excel, I must admit that I frequently use them both. Google Sheets is my go to platform for a few reasons. I can easily use it offline when there's no connection. I don't have to have access to the Microsoft Suite in …
Chose Google Sheets
i use it to track progress on tasks and projects but it can not be used for tracking costs so it doesn't compare
Chose Google Sheets
Google Sheets is worlds superior to Microsoft Excel. Sheets in comparison has a seamless and user-friendly interface, not to mention it is free. Even in my college career thus far that includes (through my university) the entire Microsoft Office collection, I would not ever be …
Chose Google Sheets
Google Sheets is much better because it is already a part of our Google Workspace and we do not have to pay any extra for an extra server or software. We also use gmail for our internal communications and Google Slides for presentations, so it is easier for us to keep …
Chose Google Sheets
Excel definitely has more features, but as long as you are not a finance person, sheets has everything you need and then some! You can do most of the same things you can do with excel, but it is more intuitive and user friendly. The best thing is being able to collaborate with …
Chose Google Sheets
Google Sheets is the best at version history and collaboration, leaving comments, writing formulas, and simple usability.
Chose Google Sheets
Microsoft Excel in terms of singular user continues to be the best one in my opinion, but for collaboration I don't agree in that position, Google Sheets are better. Libre Office and WPS office unfortunately are far away from the quality of Microsoft Excel and Google Sheets, …
Chose Google Sheets
I use google sheets when need to create very fast teamwork space and manage goals, backlog etc. it is suitable for small business and for big teams. Easy entry and familiar interface
office is enterprise solution with not very easy entry, not every one have a Microsoft account, …
Chose Google Sheets
Google Sheets is the easiest to access to use, and is arguably the most powerful with its third-party integrations. Additionally, Google apps script enhances the ability of Google Sheets to process data in custom ways. For instance, integrating zap year to connect via Web hook …
Chose Google Sheets
It's a necessary building block upon which so many other programs are created. Our most important information is best shared via sheets - information that then gets posted in all of our other platforms.
Chose Google Sheets
As I need to share most of work with my colleagues or partners, Google Sheets is the best choice over Microsoft Office. It's true that MS Office has now an online version, but the sharing capabilities are not to the level of Google Sheets. This is particularly true if you are …
Chose Google Sheets
For my usage, I find these two products absolutely equivalent for personal use. Google sheets has an advantage if you want cooperative sharing capabilities. Google sheets is especially useful if you already rely heavily on the other google products and email system.
Chose Google Sheets
Apple Numbers doesn't have the collaboration tools like Google Sheets does. And if someone isn't working on a Mac, Number will have challenges. Google Sheets works across devices and operating systems.
Chose Google Sheets
I have used Monday.com and Trello for task and project tracking. Those tools are useful in the company-wide setting where multiple people need to have access, though the way I use Google Sheets is strictly for my own eyes. In that situation, I think Google Sheets is far more …
Chose Google Sheets
Google Sheets collaborative mode and integration with google drive makes it much easier to share data across teams or organizations, while also allowing for multiple users on the product. The functionality of equations, appscripts, and AI integrations make it invaluable …
Chose Google Sheets
Way better in terms of online collaboration and sharing.
Way better for simple use-cases that do not require a ton of data cleaning & manipulation, data integration and advanced calculations.
Way worse in terms of shortcuts for productivity.
Chose Google Sheets
It is better than Excel when you need to work with many users at the same file at the same time.

It is better than Excel when you need an web browser tool, since it is faster than the equivalent version of excel.
Chose Google Sheets
Google sheets allows the most cross-team collaboration in balance with the most user-friendly interface and data limits.
Smartsheet is a close second, however some of the interface and tools are trickier for people unfamiliar and it's not as UX friendly.
Excel is fantastic for …
MongoDB
Chose MongoDB
The environment I work in is somewhat unique in that we use both MySQL and MongoDB. However, each is used for specific purposes that the other is not well suited for. MongoDB is not a relational database like MySQL, so it serves as the perfect place to dump key bits of data for …
Chose MongoDB
We have [measured] the speed in reading/write operations in high load and finally select the winner = MongoDBWe have [not] too much data but in case there will be 10 [times] more we need Cassandra. Cassandra's storage engine provides constant-time writes no matter how big your …
Chose MongoDB
Both Couchbase and MongoDB are document-oriented NoSQL databases, so they have very similar features. While they do have some fundamental differences in terms of how they scale, shard, etc. the one key reason why we went with MongoDB is its availability and support from the …
Chose MongoDB
The flexible structure underlying MongoDB's construction is not found in other competitors; the ability to easily change the structure without affecting other stored documents. It is very ideal for projects that you cannot predict that the structure will change this way. Of …
Chose MongoDB
Implementing new features for application becomes simpler with MongoDB since you don't need to run database migration scripts just to for example add new fields to database only to store some extra data. This is especially good for the deployment phase. Only new version of …
Chose MongoDB
MongoDB is a robust and scalable db which offers a lot of cool features out of the box. Being open sourced and backed by a great community with developer tools like mongo compass , it was a no-brainer to go for it. It has connectors in almost all programming languages and is a …
Chose MongoDB
MongoDB is more of a general purpose nosql database, while elasticSearch is a search engine oriented nosql solution.
Percona Server for MongoDB is a more suitable solution for the enterprise field.
Chose MongoDB
I would say Cassandra is better than MongoDB since it has the backing of Facebook to it. Its inherent properties like versioning put it into the other category of columnar databases, but it's one of the NoSQL databases which you should definitely consider for your organization …
Chose MongoDB
MongoDB is the most reliable and fastest for storing document-based data. It has a place among the most popular DB's these days.
Chose MongoDB
This tool is only capable of reading real-time data very smoothly. The transition was also pretty easy and quick. Syntax is also very easy and comfortable to learn and use.

The main reason for selecting is that it works very fast under the Intellijet module environment and we …
Chose MongoDB
In our early development days we weighed NoSQL databases like MongoDB with RDBMS solutions like MySQL. We were more familiar with MySQL from past experience but also were wary of painful data migrations that slowed down development iterations and increased the risk of outages …
Chose MongoDB
Also, using DocumentDB, and both are good, each was chosen based on the developer's expertise. So take advantage of in-house skills.
Chose MongoDB
Snowflake and Redshift are much more mature and have been around longer. MongoDB is definitely much less expensive and if you are in a startup, this is an almost for-sure option. Redshift can be slow and Mongo is much faster. However, losing the relational database aspect could …
Chose MongoDB
I just felt MongoDB was easier to use and more cost-effective. Aggregation pipelines are great.
Chose MongoDB
It's very fast and easiest to use. Many companies are using this nowadays. It's helped to complete many software products very quickly so the year income has increased compared with last years. Many programmers are now leaning this tool as back end developers so that we changed …
Chose MongoDB
We selected MongoDB because of the following
  • Ease of deployment
  • Use and provisioning on their cloud
Chose MongoDB
MongoDB is our go-to database solution for any project, and the more we work with it the more we love it. Some say that NoSQL is pointless... Our developers wholeheartedly disagree, because they love working with it. Though both NoSQL and SQL have their purposes, in most …
Chose MongoDB
Your default choice should not be MongoDB in my opinion. Most user-facing systems are relational by nature so a well known and reliable SQL database would be easier to maintain and simpler to develop long term. If you highly value speed of development go with firebase. If you …
Chose MongoDB
It does not belong to certain cloud platforms. MongoDB is an independent program that works with any cloud platform including Amazon Web Services and the Google Cloud Platform. For companies who want to maintain a cloud agnostic structure, MongoDB is a great choice for NoSQL …
Chose MongoDB
We wanted to use free ware relational database for our need. MongoDB was perfect fit.
Chose MongoDB
MongoDB and Cassandra are both database system from the NoSQL family. MongoDB can be used in lots of use cases while Cassandra has a specific usage. There are some features that MongoDB provides efficiently while Cassandra doesn't and vice-versa. Like, you can update the data …
Chose MongoDB
We tend to choose MongoDB when we're faced with a particular situation: we know that we need a NoSQL database in general, and want an open-source implementation that allows us to prevent against platform lock-in. Amazon's new DocumentDB product even allows us to choose to use …
SQLite
Chose SQLite
Postgresql is more advanced features then sqlite, however it needs a server and complexity is high for low level development work. for offline work sqlite is best. duckdb is great for analytics , it is the data base for analytics and better then sqlite for analytical purpose. …
Chose SQLite
In a mobile project it is easier to use, but on desktop, Firebird might be the better choice and it also has an embedded version.
Chose SQLite
I also use other Database Systems, but for small apps with offline storage, SQLite is a good and easy to use Database.
Chose SQLite
SQLite is faster and also Light weight as compared to Microsoft SQL Server. Also being open source it reduces the application development cost drastically
Chose SQLite
SQLite has CRUD queries and manipulates external files. Cross-platform support includes iOS, Android, Mac OS X, and Windows. Compared to other databases, it is fast and straightforward to implement. Even if an application crashes, there is no effect on the database or the data …
Chose SQLite
We looked at other traditional RDBMS products, but found them to be cumbersome to deploy. They take up more space, and consume more computing resources than SQLite does. While the performance or direct integration to our primary applications may have been better or easier if we …
Chose SQLite
SQLite has many types of queries to do CRUD operations. and even do manipulation to external files as well. it is fast and easy to implement compared to other Databases.
SQLite support atomic behaviours, so app crash in any situation, the won't impact database or data within …
Chose SQLite
Microsoft SQLExpress: More heavyweight, not as lean in terms of disk space or processing requirements. Involves Microsoft's tentacles to be involved.
Chose SQLite
SQLite is considered better against these two depending on the needs and phase of the project. If we require a lightweight yet reliable database which should also be portable across different platforms and speed is the most important part of the query and data security is not …
Chose SQLite
I think there is no real competition between them.
In "SQLite" you can hear "light" when you don't need to store a big amount of data and when you need something easy to deploy, SQLite is a good choice, I didn't find those qualities in other database systems I knew.
Chose SQLite
When looking at the original items available, Valentina was a serious contender. What was good about SQLite was the familiar SQL interface and way it accessed data. Valentina, at the time, had issues with index corruption requiring vigilance with the database maintenance making …
Chose SQLite
SQLite stacks quite well against Microsoft SQL server management studio however we need the Microsoft security for our data MDSN documentation is poor but available.
Features
Google SheetsMongoDBSQLite
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Google Sheets
-
Ratings
MongoDB
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
SQLite
-
Ratings
Performance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google SheetsMongoDBSQLite
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google SheetsMongoDBSQLite
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google SheetsMongoDBSQLite
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Sheets is perfectly suited for collaborative documentation, it's been really easy for us in situations like cost tracking, permission matrix etc, where no complex third party tools needs to be setup! Just sign in with your google account, and start doing effortless work. But keep in mind about it's performance, it's not so suitable for thousands of rows worth of data as it will start to become sluggish.
Read full review
MongoDB [is] great at storing JSON data grouped into "collections". In this format, you can store any JSON documents and conveniently categorize them by collections. The JSON document contained in MongoDB is called binary JSON or BSON and, like any other document in this format, is unstructured. Therefore, unlike traditional DBMS, any kind of data can be stored in collections, and this flexibility is combined with the horizontal scalability of the database. It should be noted that MongoDB does not have links between documents and “collections” (this is partially compensated by the Database Reference - links in the DBMS, but this does not completely solve the problem). As a result, a situation arises in which there is a certain set of data that is not related to other information in the database, and there is no way to combine data from different documents. In SQL systems, this would be an elementary task.
Read full review
The portability and ease of use has us doing local development, and then shipping the database to production for implementation. This compact deliverable object is great. Until multiple developers need to access it at a time. It is a caveat, but we create a database per integration as it is easier to manage. Using a SQLite database to manage more than one integration or task is not something we would recommend.
Read full review
Pros
  • It is a great way to collaborate in real-time with any member across the organization.
  • It easy very easy to create formulas, data validation options, and pivot tables for data analysis.
  • It is a great way to see the revision history and changes that other collaborators have made on the document.
Read full review
  • Easy to learn. When I picked up MongoDB for the first time, I had little background in database management or modeling. If you have a background in javascript (and JSON)... then you can figure out how to use MongoDB pretty fast.
  • Fast performance.
  • It's relatively easy to set up in certain environments because there are lots of ready-made solutions out there.
  • There's a lot of support in the existing ecosystem for it —, especially in the node.js realm.
  • Query syntax is pretty simple to grasp and utilize.
  • Aggregate functions are powerful.
  • Scaling options.
  • Documentation is quite good and versioned for each release.
Read full review
  • Our products are using SQLite in embedded Linux and in Windows software.
  • It is truly a stable cross-platform database.
  • The fact that it is a zero-configuration database engine, it is particularly a nice advantage when you work in the embedded world.
  • Being a single database file, it provides ease for those who need to quickly transfer data to someone else, or quickly browse data.
Read full review
Cons
  • Pivot tables are different but could be improved upon; sort, totals, filters
  • When entering negative numbers as the first in a formula you need to remember to "+-100+25" instead of "-100+25"
  • The power of the internet of course makes it easy to find solution, but the help function is not easily available
  • Color coding changes on the cell, but there is not an easy way to click on a cell and use the selected color; like excel
Read full review
  • I love the idea of Map-Reduce native support in MongoDB. Admittedly I have not used it as much as I would like -- it always seems to trip me up.
  • Recent additions to the aggregation queries have helped reduce (no pun intended) my need to better wield the weapon that is Map-Reduce.
Read full review
  • Although it is excellent at what it does, you should be really careful and plan accordingly if you know that your database is going to scale at a huge level because it is not suitable of databases which are of Enterprise level and demands top-notch security and protection.
  • If your project involves multiple people working on the same database simultaneously, then that becomes a big problem, because it only allows single write at one time. You really need to be forward thinking in a manner to predict if this database will cater to all the needs of your project.
  • The most common difficulty with this is the lack of some of the basic functionality which is present in the other premier databases like Joints, Stored Procedure calls, Security and permission grants. If you do require all those things then you are better off not using this software.
  • Lastly, if you are using this in an Andriod App development cycle then also your options are limited because it does not integrate with PostgreSQL and MYSQL.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I am not involved in the purchase/selection process, but my organization is a Google shop, and Sheets meets most of our spreadsheet needs and works seamlessly with our other tools. I don't anticipate our switching anytime soon.
Read full review
MongoDB is one of the most famous non-relational databases in the world, there are famous active projects that use this database. I think that the same company that develops the database gives you the online induction totally free is something that really is very positive. Accounts with a first-class support to be able to relate the correct implementation of the database, in addition to teaching you the best practices to optimize your projects, I believe that with this decision it is more than obvious which is the best decision at the time of seeing with which database to work.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It can easily handle most uses and functions. It is only for very large datasets or advanced analysis that it either lacks the proper functions or performance begins to slow. Most employees who continue to use competitors' products do so out of preference, familiarity with the user interface, or other surface-level reasons.
Read full review
It is one of the reasons why we prefer it to store documents in a JSON-style format, to access the desired document very quickly regardless of its size, to be readable by human eyes, and to be easily scalable and manageable.
Read full review
I have given this rating cause its irreplaceable in some of the areas like no more installation need except from a single library. I find dialect is simple in use cases. its suitable for any professionals with various skill levels. its easily connect with various os and devices. very less maintenance or administration required.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Like most Google products, Google Sheets rarely has outages or slowness, and when it does, connection is always momentarily restored. I can't recall a time when I've been unable to access Google Sheets but able to access other sites just fine. That said, errors aren't uncommon when handling large data volume. You know what they say about using spreadsheets as databases, but sometimes it's just the most convenient option, especially for smaller or one-off projects, and not being able to store large amounts of data hampers our ability to move quickly with scrappy prototypes or full solutions. It would be great if we could better integrate our data manipulation (Apps Script) with big data in the sheet.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Performance
Again, Google Sheets is no exception to Google's general high speed and reliability, but load times can be slow for larger amounts of data. I've used Sheets with Zapier and have used the Python API, and speed has never been an issue.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have never contacted Google Sheets support, but Google Sheets makes it very easy to report an issue or suggest a feature from Sheets itself (Help > Help Sheets improve), and I've had mostly good experiences with support for other Google products.
Read full review
I have reached multiple times to the MongoDB community for the help and they have provided each and easy solution for every problem. Over the internet and on stack overflow many people responds over the challenges. Now this tool is very much used in every company and projects so internally many people are there to give a support.
Read full review
I haven't needed support yet.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
While the setup and configuration of MongoDB is pretty straight forward, having a vendor that performs automatic backups and scales the cluster automatically is very convenient. If you do not have a system administrator or DBA familiar with MongoDB on hand, it's a very good idea to use a 3rd party vendor that specializes in MongoDB hosting. The value is very well worth it over hosting it yourself since the cost is often reasonable among providers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft Excel in terms of singular user continues to be the best one in my opinion, but for collaboration I don't agree in that position, Google Sheets are better. Libre Office and WPS Office unfortunately are far away from the quality of Microsoft Excel and Google Sheets, they are good solutions if you don't want to trust the data on external services, other than that they are not good.
Read full review
The environment I work in is somewhat unique in that we use both MySQL and MongoDB. However, each is used for specific purposes that the other is not well suited for. MongoDB is not a relational database like MySQL, so it serves as the perfect place to dump key bits of data for quick retrieval later. This is something we can't easily do with MySQL. On this smaller database, MongoDB also lets us retrieve data more quickly with its fast and efficient querying.
Read full review
SQLite has CRUD queries and manipulates external files. Cross-platform support includes iOS, Android, Mac OS X, and Windows. Compared to other databases, it is fast and straightforward to implement. Even if an application crashes, there is no effect on the database or the data it contains. The user interface is best for input and output. It's best for developing skills and project deliverables.
Read full review
Scalability
Google Sheets works very well with multiple users. It's convenient to see in real-time who is collaborating in a sheet, down to the specific cell that they're viewing/editing. Linking Sheets across departments is convenient with the IMPORTRANGE function.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Client outreach; it has helped me make a list of customers to reach out to.
  • Accounting; it has made accounting SO much easier and smoother, so I have more time to focus on clients and projects.
  • Cost formulas - it's allowed me to make comfortable margins with fair customer pricing by making breakeven formula sheets.
Read full review
  • We can make more open and flexible systems due to its easy adaptation to new evolutions in web applications.
  • In the latest versions it offers support for different transactions and we could carry out real tests related to the concurrency of the application.
  • MongoDB allows you to have distributed clusters, which improves the speed of the queries by reducing the latency that exists between the database cluster and the service that executes the query.
Read full review
  • No licensing fees has a net increase on ROI
  • The active community has kept support costs low, further increasing ROI
  • The wide range of supported platforms and high level of compatibility has increased ROI by reducing time spent porting the database model to any platform specific solutions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MongoDB Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of