Grasshopper is an IP telephony business communication solution that provides companies with a toll-free or local phone number. It has both desktop and mobile applications and includes features such as custom greeting recording, call forwarding, call transfer, call reporting, and voicemail.
$18
per month for a single user
Hull CDP (discontinued)
Score 4.7 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Hull CDP was a real-time rule and action engine that provided SaaS and Ecommerce businesses with more control over their customer data. Hull was acquired by MessageBird in April, 2021, and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Grasshopper
Hull CDP (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
True Solo
$18
per month for a single user
Solo Plus
$32
per month
Small Business
$70
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Grasshopper
Hull CDP (discontinued)
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
20% discount available for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Grasshopper
Hull CDP (discontinued)
Features
Grasshopper
Hull CDP (discontinued)
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.7
46 Ratings
19% above category average
Hull CDP (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX
9.423 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
10.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
User templates
10.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call reports
9.433 Ratings
00 Ratings
Directory of employee names
9.434 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.6
51 Ratings
14% above category average
Hull CDP (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Answering rules
9.247 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call recording
9.622 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call park
9.812 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call screening
10.036 Ratings
00 Ratings
Message alerts
9.243 Ratings
00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
7.9
12 Ratings
1% below category average
Hull CDP (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Video conferencing
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio conferencing
7.77 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video screen sharing
8.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instant messaging
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
8.9
48 Ratings
10% above category average
Hull CDP (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS
8.935 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android
8.929 Ratings
00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Grasshopper
Hull CDP (discontinued)
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Grasshopper is well suited for basic needs of texting in and out as well as calling out if you would like to avoid using your personal line. It also eliminates the need to have a dedicated land land in your office or business. You can obtain a vanity number and forward calls through grasshopper.
Hull is definitely the leading CDP for the small to mid-sized business in which the marketing team wants or needs to have a fair amount of autonomy from engineering, or when it's unrealistic or cost-prohibitive to use internal engineering resources to maintain the marketing database. It's also a great choice for companies who are trying to bring newer and smaller best-of-breed elements into place in their marketing--enabling you to sync customer data records to CTAs/ Chat scenarios/ Email Service Providers, or any type of 3rd party campaign tools. It's probably not the best fit for companies trying to stay in a larger Marketing Cloud Ecosystem, e.g. Adobe/ Oracle.
Slack integration - we revolve around slack as our central comm hub and having our customer information surfaceable is just gold.
Making back-end data easy to read and digest - there is a lot of data that gets generated by our customers and it's impossible to sift through without Hull consolidating that information for us.
Customer support - we have only had a couple issues in the many months using Hull and it's always been a quick resolution. They use Slack to support BTW which I love.
It would be nice to have the ability to transfer some calls to another Grasshopper IVR, for those customers who mistakenly dial the wrong number (we have two incoming numbers, one for corporate and one for sales).
Likewise, it would be nice to have the ability to forward to a toll-free number, which would have allowed us to work around the inability to transfer between IVRs (see above).
Lastly, it would be great to have an 'emergency' switch setting (default off but could be toggled on) that would let us override all IVR settings and transfer all incoming calls elsewhere (either to a direct dial or toll free number) for those rare times when we cannot take any calls (such as a weather emergency OR the one time each year we take all of our staff on a retreat) - that would allow us to send all calls to a backup answering service rather than just voicemail.
When I was setting up my account I contacted support a couple of times. They were also very professional, personable, and helpful. Their response is prompt and thorough. I'm confident I can get any question answered as well as help with any issue I might have. That's pretty important to me.
I have not used any other phone services like Grasshopper. I know that there is another option out there called Ruby, which is more like a virtual receptionist but since I did not try it out I cannot compare the two. When I started my company I found the services that Grasshopper offers to be perfect. It still works for us and we have no need to change to anything else right now.
We had initially identified Segment as a solution due to the number of integrations they supported. The problem is that with Segment we would have still had to build and maintain a database along with query tools. Overall Hull emerged as a better starting point for us