Grasshopper is an IP telephony business communication solution that provides companies with a toll-free or local phone number. It has both desktop and mobile applications and includes features such as custom greeting recording, call forwarding, call transfer, call reporting, and voicemail.
$18
per month for a single user
NiCE CXone
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
NICE CXone Mpower is a cloud-based contact center platform that manages customer interactions across multiple communication channels. It includes features such as automatic call distribution (ACD), interactive voice response (IVR), omnichannel routing, workforce optimization, feedback management, and interaction analytics.
$71
per month per user
Pricing
Grasshopper
NiCE CXone
Editions & Modules
True Solo
$18
per month for a single user
Solo Plus
$32
per month
Small Business
$70
per month
CXone Mpower Digital Agent
$71
per month per user
CXone Mpower Voice Agent
$94
per month per user
CXone Mpower Omnichannel Agent
$110
per month per user
CXone Mpower Essential Suite
$135
per month per user
Cxone Mpower Core Suite
$169
per month per user
CXone Mpower Complete Suite
$209
per month per user
CXone Mpower Ultimate Suite
$249
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Grasshopper
NiCE CXone
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
20% discount available for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Grasshopper
NiCE CXone
Features
Grasshopper
NiCE CXone
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.7
46 Ratings
19% above category average
NiCE CXone
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX
9.423 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
10.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
User templates
10.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call reports
9.433 Ratings
00 Ratings
Directory of employee names
9.434 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
9.6
51 Ratings
14% above category average
NiCE CXone
-
Ratings
Answering rules
9.247 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call recording
9.622 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call park
9.812 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call screening
10.036 Ratings
00 Ratings
Message alerts
9.243 Ratings
00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
7.9
12 Ratings
1% below category average
NiCE CXone
-
Ratings
Video conferencing
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio conferencing
7.77 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video screen sharing
8.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instant messaging
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
8.9
48 Ratings
10% above category average
NiCE CXone
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS
8.935 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android
8.929 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper
-
Ratings
NiCE CXone
9.4
581 Ratings
12% above category average
Agent dashboard
00 Ratings
9.3559 Ratings
Validate callers
00 Ratings
9.6471 Ratings
Outbound response
00 Ratings
9.5490 Ratings
Call forwarding
00 Ratings
9.4443 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)
00 Ratings
9.1403 Ratings
Warm transfer
00 Ratings
9.8531 Ratings
Predictive dialing
00 Ratings
9.7317 Ratings
Interactive voice response
00 Ratings
9.6376 Ratings
REST APIs
00 Ratings
9.3301 Ratings
Call scripts
00 Ratings
9.2322 Ratings
Call tracking
00 Ratings
9.5510 Ratings
Multichannel integration
00 Ratings
9.4364 Ratings
CRM software integration
00 Ratings
9.0365 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
Grasshopper is well suited for basic needs of texting in and out as well as calling out if you would like to avoid using your personal line. It also eliminates the need to have a dedicated land land in your office or business. You can obtain a vanity number and forward calls through grasshopper.
NICE CXone Mpower offers a great suite of products and tools appropriate for contact centers. It is a one stop shop for all of the monitoring, scheduling, reporting, and quality tools a large or small contact center may need. It is very feature rich and has many components, some of which we haven't even grown to adopt yet but may in the near future.
It would be nice to have the ability to transfer some calls to another Grasshopper IVR, for those customers who mistakenly dial the wrong number (we have two incoming numbers, one for corporate and one for sales).
Likewise, it would be nice to have the ability to forward to a toll-free number, which would have allowed us to work around the inability to transfer between IVRs (see above).
Lastly, it would be great to have an 'emergency' switch setting (default off but could be toggled on) that would let us override all IVR settings and transfer all incoming calls elsewhere (either to a direct dial or toll free number) for those rare times when we cannot take any calls (such as a weather emergency OR the one time each year we take all of our staff on a retreat) - that would allow us to send all calls to a backup answering service rather than just voicemail.
There can be changes in interface of the app, however it's still very good
I would appreciete detailed web page with all necessary information, but when I need anything, the customer support is very quick and provide all the information
Nice made it possible for employees to work from anywhere with access to the internet, it made it possible to extract data from contacts in a very thorough way. In addition, the meticaes can be fully customized and the day-to-day monitoring of the operation is more visible.With nice, contacts with clients abroad became easier.
The lack of written SOPs makes some features (WFM / Performance management) very difficult to use. The training provided by NICE is extensive, but it's hard to remember everything shared in the hour. We spend so much time on the platform just trying to figure out how to use the features; it would be much easier with written instructions and screenshots.
NICE inContact CXone is available when you need it. I have been using it for about a year and I have never suffered any issues that caused my not to have access to the product. If there are updates, they must be downloaded and install in the background because I do not see them
NICE inContact CXone performs very well even on old computers that are limited in resources. I use a older computer with limited memory and it seems to handle NICE inContact CXone very well in most cases. There will be times when it acts up for whatever reason bust over ninety percent of the time.
When I was setting up my account I contacted support a couple of times. They were also very professional, personable, and helpful. Their response is prompt and thorough. I'm confident I can get any question answered as well as help with any issue I might have. That's pretty important to me.
inContact only allows specific users to contact them for support. Even though I use the product daily and it accounts for a large amount of my workload, I still have to contact an authorized user to create an incident. These users are managers and their schedules are very busy. This can result in delays in incidents being opened and resolved.
The In-person training was fine for a general overview. I think it would have been really helpful to have a review of pre-built reports and how to use them as tools.
I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.I would rate 10, since the explanations were far enough to catch all the usabilities.
We love the use of our new tools. However, NICE staff turnover was frustrating. We lost ground each time a new team took over. Some people were good some were not as much. Some people did great training while others were not as helpful
I have not used any other phone services like Grasshopper. I know that there is another option out there called Ruby, which is more like a virtual receptionist but since I did not try it out I cannot compare the two. When I started my company I found the services that Grasshopper offers to be perfect. It still works for us and we have no need to change to anything else right now.
When it comes to this specific situation (cell centers) NICE definitely has an ADP beat. The analytics, scheduling, and forecasts are extremely well-tailored for this situation. ADP has a more comprehensive solution in my opinion - I feel their UI and mobile app are also more user-friendly. But in terms of performance management functionality, NICE has a more robust system and is able to create additional metrics if we need them When I used ADP there were no custom options available.
I rated 10, because Nice CX one is very much functional. You can simply acess it by website Nice, in any navigator, desktop, notebook or mobile, so you can in a fast way run on every departament of the company.