Chose IBM FileNet Content Manager
FileNet v ApplicationXtender
FileNet - much more robust.
ApplicationXtender - far more lightweight, easier to deploy and configure. Much more limited in scope.
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() IBM FileNet Content Manager | N/A | IBM FileNet Content Manager is a cloud-native content services solution to manage, share and collaborate on content to save employees’ time and improve customer experiences. This ECM solution includes functionality for document management, business process management, case management, content analytics, imaging, records management, and information governance. The IBM FileNet Content Manager content management solution provides the foundation for IBM Cloud Pak® for Business Automation. It uses AI… | N/A | |
OpenText Content Suite Platform | N/A | The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity. | N/A |
IBM FileNet Content Manager | OpenText Content Suite Platform | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
IBM FileNet Content Manager | OpenText Content Suite Platform | |
---|---|---|
Considered Both Products | ![]() IBM FileNet Content Manager | ![]() OpenText Content Suite Platform No answer on this topic |
Top Pros | ||
Top Cons |
|
|
IBM FileNet Content Manager | OpenText Content Suite Platform | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enterprise Content Management |
|
IBM FileNet Content Manager | OpenText Content Suite Platform | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Square 9 Softworks Score 9.8 out of 10 | Square 9 Softworks Score 9.8 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MediaValet Score 9.6 out of 10 | MediaValet Score 9.6 out of 10 |
Enterprises | MediaValet Score 9.6 out of 10 | MediaValet Score 9.6 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
IBM FileNet Content Manager | OpenText Content Suite Platform | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.2 (23 ratings) | 10.0 (8 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
Availability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
Performance | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
Support Rating | 6.0 (1 ratings) | 9.0 (1 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 5.3 (17 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
IBM FileNet Content Manager | OpenText Content Suite Platform | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() IBM
| ![]() OpenText
|
Pros | ![]() IBM
| ![]() OpenText
|
Cons | ![]() IBM
| ![]() OpenText
|
Likelihood to Renew | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | ![]() OpenText
|
Usability | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | ![]() OpenText
|
Reliability and Availability | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | ![]() OpenText
|
Performance | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | ![]() OpenText
|
Support Rating | ![]() IBM
| ![]() OpenText
|
Implementation Rating | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | ![]() OpenText
|
Alternatives Considered | ![]() IBM
| ![]() OpenText
|
Return on Investment | ![]() IBM
| ![]() OpenText
|
ScreenShots | IBM FileNet Content Manager Screenshots |