IBM Targetprocess vs. productboard

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes.N/A
productboard
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
productboard, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is a product management system designed to help product managers understand what users need, prioritize what to build, and rally everyone around a roadmap.
$25
per month
Pricing
IBM Targetprocessproductboard
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$25.00
per month
Pro
$60.00
per month
Scale
$120.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Targetprocessproductboard
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Targetprocessproductboard
Considered Both Products
IBM Targetprocess
Chose IBM Targetprocess
ServiceNow CPQ and SAP LeanIX Enterprise Architecture
Chose IBM Targetprocess
More value for less money, and easier to set up.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Selected IBM Targetprocess because of it's integration with Apptio. We still are using workboard as IBM Targetprocess doesn't allow a Many to many OKR connection
Chose IBM Targetprocess
ServiceNow Now Platform, Broadcom Clarity and Jira Align
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Not using any other products that compare with Targetprocess. The reason we use Targetprocess is because its ability to integrate with other tool and specifically other IBM tools which provides organizations who already have made investments with other IBM tools like …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess is more customizable and can adapt to the organization's needs than Jira Algin
Chose IBM Targetprocess
On par with these tools but with room for improvement
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Lower cost
Easier implementation
Less restrictive in terms of customisation
Chose IBM Targetprocess
We chose IBM Targetprocess because, in our opinion, IBM Targetprocess has Richer capabilities
Chose IBM Targetprocess
During our RFP and demo rating Apptio Targetprocess came out with the highest score by 3% and was the more cost effective of the closer rival. It rated the highest in 4 out of the 8 categories we graded and had one of the most cost effective implementation costs and ranked the …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess outshone the competition on several benchmarks. The most important for our team was ease of administration, ease of configuration, cost of licenses, and ability to leverage the tool in multiple areas (not just project management or engineering). Apptio …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess has more features and is more flexible for our users and its easier to develop automation rules and metrics than Atlassian Jira Alige or Planview AgilePlan.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
It’s better because of its flexibility and ability to support agile at scale as well as portfolio management in one tool.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
I wasn't a decisionmaker on the adoption of Apptio Targetprocess over the competitors so I can't clearly speak to this question.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Others weren't compared
productboard
Chose productboard
I have previously used Aha another product road mapping/ insights driven software.

Aha had great features for the userbase of my previous products. They were allowed to create their own suggestions for the products and other users could then like or dislike the suggestion. …
Chose productboard
Productboard is more feature-rich. It has very intuitive to use and can be connected to various applications. Showcasing your roadmap is very easy and collaboration is very easy as well.

Productboard has great UX features where you can see the roadmap in multiple ways with …
Chose productboard
Productboard has a modern interface with a great user experience that will help you get onboard really fast especially if you are looking for one place to handle customer insights that are coming from different places and be able to score and report under value vs effort …
Chose productboard
productboard is geared directly towards receiving, organizing, and evaluating product ideas.
Chose productboard
Productboard is leaner, easier to use, and cleaner than Aha! I switched from Aha! to productboard and did not regret the decision. Aha! may be better suited to larger operations or teams, but productboard is perfect for smaller teams and solo product managers.
Features
IBM Targetprocessproductboard
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Targetprocess
6.9
Ratings
8% below category average
productboard
-
Ratings
Task Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Search5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Targetprocess
6.7
Ratings
15% below category average
productboard
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Collaboration7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Velocity Calculation5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Targetprocessproductboard
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Craft.io
Craft.io
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
ProductPlan
ProductPlan
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Roadmunk
Roadmunk
Score 5.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Targetprocessproductboard
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Targetprocessproductboard
Likelihood to Recommend
Apptio Targetprocess is well suited to track work and progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the flexibility of Targetprocess and the ability to develop their own views and reports Scenarios where it is less appropriate is to do executive level reporting and develop reports that can pull in all of our time data since there is a 300k record limit
Read full review
The best feature of productboard is organized features, it has a very simple structure and can be read and understood by anyone. If your roadmap is very dynamic and the executive team needs to be on top of it, productboard is the best application out there. But if you have a small product and features do not change very often, then maybe you can look at other alternatives since productboard is expensive.
Read full review
Pros
  • Basic flexibility out of the box is a big advantage for a small company without resources to customize, as is needed for some of the larger competitors.
  • The support is second to none. They've even written custom TP queries to get me what I want.
  • They have managed to cover all the basics of product development in one product, in particular, the inclusion of customer support (although limited) is a big selling point for a small company.
Read full review
  • Flexibility - organize your products and features in any way you like
  • Input - give your teams a way to make suggestions and provide feedback
  • Integrations
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
  • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
  • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.
Read full review
  • The interface could be improved
  • Input field options could be less restrictive to the capture of data
  • Better notifications / updates on where insights have got to
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Targetprocess is the most flexible application for tracking work among teams that we have found. This power comes from near limitless ability to customize your views on the work tracked in the system, and from the myriad reporting options to draw metrics and stats out of the data there. Custom fields, processes, and mashups all add to this flexibility and appeal.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall Targetprocess's usability is good. the tool is easy to use and has features which most BUs and organizations can use. Additional features like AI integration would help the tool and its overall usability. providing additional dashboards for specific roles and executives within the tool would benefit Targetprocess with its scale
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Some minor outages are experienced, though these tend to pass within an hour usually and work can continue
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Reports are fast loading, considering they can refresh in a second or less and we have 7 years of work tracked in over 40k entities. Pages can load slowly when the views are very busy, but not frustratingly. I am a console user most of my career and generally prefer it over webUI interfaces, but Targetprocess won me over from the beginning and I spend half my day using it now.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
TargetProcess' support is one of its strengths. The support team is very responsive and helpful when there is a problem but they're also proactive in providing good release notes and engaging with the community through a voting scheme to influence the priority of new features.
The team also releases new versions frequently with new features but with no knock-ons to currently working features.
Read full review
Easy to contact right through their Intercom app and incredibly fast to respond.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
You should take some time to get everyone to agree how the system should be setup before work starts being tracked in Targetprocess, this avoids difficult and disruptive changes to processes or plugins later when everyone relies on it daily.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Targetprocess was all around the better tool. They do not nickel-and-dime you and you don't have to deal with multiple products that do, or do not, integrate well together. Below are some of Targetprocess' biggest strengths:
  • Highly customizable; can fit the needs of almost any team
  • Robust reporting tool
  • Easy to use and administer
  • Provides all the functionality an agile org would be looking for
  • Support team and user guide are phenomenal.
Read full review
I have previously used Aha another product road mapping/ insights driven software. Aha had great features for the userbase of my previous products. They were allowed to create their own suggestions for the products and other users could then like or dislike the suggestion. This created a real reflection on need for product enhancements. productboard handles this slightly differently. Each user creates their own suggestions and doesn't necessarily have visibility on other users suggestions. The product/ R&D team can then tag suggestions together into the same overall suggestion. This requires more input from product/R&D with productboard. I would however, suggest that productboard is better than Aha. Aha is great for an external user point of view; however, there may be case for users to not have visibility on wider user requirements. productboard keeps more of this element hidden and would perhaps stir up less negative correlation to seeing a system requirement/suggest having had a lot of traffic and no action, compared to a more closed system that would individually update each user on the enhancement progress.
Read full review
Scalability
We use the hosted version of Targetprocess and have never run into limitations or degraded performance due to scalability. Excellent performance over 7 years!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • TargetProcess is my all-time favorite project management software that enables me to work collaboratively and also enthusiastically with my colleagues.
  • Before its invention, emails were difficult to handle in the past but now to make connections better I only trust this application because it’s a good intuitive to work in the form of group.
  • It provides me a quite useful view that facilitates my working in a way that I can create a customized view of all my ongoing projects.
Read full review
  • Helps to save us a lot of time collecting feedback.
  • Increased efficiency.
  • Product prioritization can be done in a faster and more robust way.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Targetprocess Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demandScreenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolioScreenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product fundingScreenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategyScreenshot of Workforce ManagementScreenshot of Work