Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
MATLAB
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
MatLab is a predictive analytics and computing platform based on a proprietary programming language. MatLab is used across industry and academia.
$49
per student license
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Posit, formerly RStudio, is a modular data science platform, combining open source and commercial products.N/A
Pricing
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLABPosit
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Student
$49
per student license
Home
$149
perpetual license
Education
$250
per year
Education
$500
perpetual license
Standard
$860
per year
Standard
2,150
perpetual license
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson StudioMATLABPosit
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLABPosit
Considered Multiple Products
IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
IBM offers a deep neural network training workflow, with a flow editor interface similar to the one used in Azure ML Studio. However, the custom build modeling in IBM has notebooks such as Jupiter to program models manually using popular frameworks like TensorFlow, …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
With my experience on Jupyter Notebook I think both are good and currently more comfortable with Watson Studio product. With Jupyter it's open source (free) is always good. "Lots of languages (50), data visualization with Seaborn, work with the building blocks in a flexible and …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Watson Studio was our choice in data management because its "all-in-one" packaging. Watson studio also stood out to us because it was more affordable and free for our organization to try out. We also greatly value the open source ecosystem Watson Studio has fostered.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Watson Studio offers more capabilities and diversity in tools and services.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
The learning curve for DSX is smaller compared to other tools. The data science user base often has preferred tools that they have used previously which are often not DSX which makes adoption of DSX by trained data scientists harder than new users.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
I chose DSx because it had a better interface and was more centralized, while allowing team members to work on it as well.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
IBM DSx lost the comparison.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
First, I have to deploy H2O myself. Then 4 paradigm cannot customize code and run customized code as easily as IBM DSX. Last, I should say AliPAI is a good alternative, but it's too expensive.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
I wanted an environment that can support multiple users without any restrictions. Also, R-Studio does not provide a collaborative environment for multiple users. The Auto feature selection in the SPSS modeler is a good node in DSx which helps make statistical decisions on …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
SPSS - Totally different approaches, SPSS UI is now a well-known name with a well-established user base who we consider aren´t going anywhere but Statistics.

Modeler - A proven analytical solution with capabilities to deal with huge datasets, scalability offers you now the …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Amazon EMR - easy to set up, but hard to use for development Databricks - good option as well Azure HD insight - the same as AWS.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
We did not evaluate comparable platforms. The customer suggested using DSx.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
When developing the use case we considered using a big data platform for developing the required analytics. After evaluating the alternatives and costs we considered that using a big data platform would be too expensive for the kind of studies we are developing in the company. …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
DSX has power of open source tools brought together in an integrated and secured environment.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
The mix of proprietary and open-source benefits that DSx offers gives me more flexibility than any other options I have encountered. I have the custom program building capability of Anaconda with the built-in predictive models of SPSS Modeler. I have more visualization …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
DSX is more flexible and user-friendly. It is not clear which product to use.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
The IBM Data Science Experience enables data scientists to collaborate through projects, to which they can add notebooks, data, data connections, and other users they want to collaborate with. In Jupyter notebooks they can use Python, R, or Scala, when needed with Apache Spark, …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
DSX performed almost 2.5 times faster than Microsoft's free Jupyter Notebook service on their Azure platform.
MATLAB
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB's neurophysiological data pre-processing third-party packages are more scientifically validated compared to support for other software platforms. It also allows for writing code with a greater level of functionality and more capabilities than R-Studio, which is instead …
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB has a very large database of embedded functions and it is continually growing. Graphics processing is much easier than other similar product for beginners (such as Jupyter notebook and Python). Although it is not an open-source language, lots of learning materials and …
Chose MATLAB
I like the user interface of MATLAB and find it most intuitive compared to any of the other three programs I listed. However, unlike RStudio and Oracle VM VirtualBox, MATLAB is not open source. I do prefer MATLAB over PyCharm, because I find MATLAB to be a bit more intuitive. I …
Chose MATLAB
MATLAB is very similar to R and Python, but has cleaner syntax than R and more in-built functionality than Python. However, both are free and therefore have that significant advantage over MATLAB. SQL is simpler but much more limited in use.
Posit
Chose Posit
RStudio is the free alternative to MATLAB. It works just as well as the other software, and more features can be accessed but to the open-source nature. This software is more commonplace in the research lab setting due to its free cost.
Chose Posit
I have tried to work a bit with Jupyer notebooks and Spyder, but both are way less agreeable than RStudio.
Once you taste RStudio, you can't go back!
Chose Posit
Far better integrated and easy to use. The only full-blown Python IDE is PyCharm, and it is a monolith. I used Spyder instead. I was very happy when RStudio added Python support so I can ditch Jupyter Notebooks, which really isn't an IDE but is more like RMarkdown, a small …
Chose Posit
While many of these are great, RStudio is the best for R work. There is also native support in the IDE for combining other languages, like Python, into workflows easily so work across languages can be handled in one location.
Chose Posit
Coding in RStudio is more convenient and plot display in RStudio can be more user-defined than JMP Pro.
Chose Posit
In our organization RStudio is the main competitor for STATA. STATA has a larger number of users as it is far more user-friendly and has a large number of canned routines that work really well. RStudio is a niche software ideally suited to work with larger datasets.
Features
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLABPosit
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
3% below category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Posit
9.3
27 Ratings
11% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.022 Ratings00 Ratings8.026 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.022 Ratings00 Ratings10.027 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.021 Ratings00 Ratings10.026 Ratings
MDM Integration6.414 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
17% above category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Posit
9.0
27 Ratings
6% above category average
Visualization10.022 Ratings00 Ratings8.027 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.022 Ratings00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
15% above category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Posit
10.0
26 Ratings
20% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.022 Ratings00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Data Transformations10.021 Ratings00 Ratings10.026 Ratings
Data Encryption8.020 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.021 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
12% above category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Posit
10.0
22 Ratings
17% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.021 Ratings00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning10.022 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.022 Ratings00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings10.019 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
6% below category average
MATLAB
-
Ratings
Posit
9.9
18 Ratings
15% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.022 Ratings00 Ratings10.018 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.022 Ratings00 Ratings9.915 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLABPosit
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
Score 8.2 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Alteryx Platform
Alteryx Platform
Score 9.1 out of 10
Dataiku
Dataiku
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLABPosit
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(65 ratings)
8.1
(53 ratings)
10.0
(123 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(17 ratings)
Usability
9.6
(2 ratings)
9.9
(4 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(3 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
9.5
(7 ratings)
8.9
(9 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(4 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMATLABPosit
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
MathWorks
MATLAB really does best for solving computational problems in math and engineering. Especially when you have to use a lot of functions in your solving process, or if you have a nonlinear equation that must be iteratively solved. [MATLAB] can also perform things like integration and derivation on your equations that you put into it.
Read full review
Posit (formerly RStudio)
In my humble opinion, if you are working on something related to Statistics, RStudio is your go-to tool. But if you are looking for something in Machine Learning, look out for Python. The beauty is that there are packages now by which you can write Python/SQL in R. Cross-platform functionality like such makes RStudio way ahead of its competition. A couple of chinks in RStudio armor are very small and can be considered as nagging just for the sake of argument. Other than completely based on programming language, I couldn't find significant drawbacks to using RStudio. It is one of the best free software available in the market at present.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
MathWorks
  • It has a very user friendly library which helps users learn this software fairly quickly in a short span of time.
  • The graphical user interface provided by the software is really good.
  • The code that a person writes allows options for debugging.
  • One can visualize the flow of control of their code inside MATLAB.
Read full review
Posit (formerly RStudio)
  • The support is incredibly professional and helpful, and they often go out of their way to help me when something doesn't work.
  • The one-click publishing from RStudio Connect is absolutely amazing, and I really like the way that it deploys your exact package versions, because otherwise, you can get in a terrible mess.
  • Python doesn't feel quite as native as R at the moment but I have definitely deployed stuff in R and Python that works beautifully which is really nice indeed.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
MathWorks
  • MatLab is pricier than most of its competitors and because of this reason, many organizations are moving towards cheaper alternatives - mostly Python.
  • MatLab is inefficient when it comes to performing a large number of iterations. It gets laggy and often crashes. Python is better in this regard.
  • There is a limited number of hardware options (mostly NI) that can be connected directly to the data acquisition toolbox.
Read full review
Posit (formerly RStudio)
  • Python integration is newer and still can be rough, especially with when using virtual environments.
  • RStudio Connect pricing feels very department focused, not quite an enterprise perspective.
  • Some of the RStudio packages don't follow conventional development guidelines (API breaking changes with minor version numbers) which can make supporting larger projects over longer timeframes difficult.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
MathWorks
No answers on this topic
Posit (formerly RStudio)
There is no viable alternative right now. The toolset is good and the functionality is increasing with every release. It is backed by regular releases and ongoing development by the RStudio team. There is good engagement with RStudio directly when support is required. Also there's a strong and growing community of developers who provide additional support and sample code.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
MathWorks
MATLAB is pretty easy to use. You can extend its capabilities using the programming interface. Very flexible capabilities when it comes to graphical presentation of your data (so many different kinds of options for your plotting needs). Anytime you are working with large data sets, or with matrices, MATLAB is likely to be very helpful.
Read full review
Posit (formerly RStudio)
For someone who learns how to use the software and picks up on the "language" of R, it's very easy to use. For beginners, it can be hard and might require a course, as well as the appropriate statistical training to understand what packages to use and when
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
MathWorks
No answers on this topic
Posit (formerly RStudio)
RStudio is very available and cheap to use. It needs to be updated every once in a while, but the updates tend to be quick and they do not hinder my ability to make progress. I have not experienced any RStudio outages, and I have used the application quite a bit for a variety of statistical analyses
Read full review
Performance
IBM
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
MathWorks
No answers on this topic
Posit (formerly RStudio)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
MathWorks
The built-in search engine is not as performing as I wish it would be. However, the YouTube channel has a vast library of informative video that can help understanding the software. Also, many other software have a nice bridge into MATLAB, which makes it very versatile. Overall, the support for MATLAB is good.
Read full review
Posit (formerly RStudio)
Since R is trendy among statisticians, you can find lots of help from the data science/ stats communities. If you need help with anything related to RStudio or R, google it or search on StackOverflow, you might easily find the solution that you are looking for.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
MathWorks
No answers on this topic
Posit (formerly RStudio)
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
MathWorks
No answers on this topic
Posit (formerly RStudio)
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
MathWorks
No answers on this topic
Posit (formerly RStudio)
We did it at the individual level: anyone willing to code in R can use it. No real deployment involved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
MathWorks
How MATLAB compares to its competition or similar open access tools like R (programming language) or SciLab is that it's simply more powerful and capable. It embraces a wider spectrum of possibilities for far more fields than any other environment. R, for example, is intended primarily for the area of statistical computing. SciLab, on the other hand, is a similar open access tool that falls very short in its computing capabilities. It's much slower when running larger scripts and isn't documented or supported nearly as well as MATLAB.
Read full review
Posit (formerly RStudio)
RStudio was provided as the most customizable. It was also strictly the most feature-rich as far as enabling our organization to script, run, and make use of R open-source packages in our data analysis workstreams. It also provided some support for python, which was useful when we had R heavy code with some python threaded in. Overall we picked Rstudio for the features it provided for our data analysis needs and the ability to interface with our existing resources.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
MathWorks
No answers on this topic
Posit (formerly RStudio)
RStudio is very scalable as a product. The issue I have is that it doesn't necessarily fit in nicely with the mainly Microsoft environment that everybody else is using. Having RStudio for us means dedicated servers and recruiting staff who know how to manage the environment. This isn't a fault of the product at all, it's just part of the data science landscape that we all have to put up with. Having said that RStudio is absolutely great for running on low spec servers and there are loads of options to handle concurrency, memory use, etc.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
MathWorks
  • MATLAB helps us quickly sort through large sets of data because we keep the same script each time we run an analyzation, making it very efficient to run this whole process.
  • The software makes it super easy for us to create plots that we can then show to investors or clients to display our data.
  • We are also looking to create an app for our product, and we will not be able to do that on MATLAB, therefore creating a limiting issue and a new learning curve for a programming language.
Read full review
Posit (formerly RStudio)
  • Using it for data science in a very big and old company, the most positive impact, from my point of view, has been the ability of spreading data culture across the group. Shortening the path from data to value.
  • Still it's hard to quantify economic benefits, we are struggling and it's a great point of attention, since splitting out the contribution of the single aspects of a project (and getting the RStudio pie) is complicated.
  • What is sure is that, in the long run, RStudio is boosting productivity and making the process in which is embedded more efficient (cost reduction).
Read full review
ScreenShots

Posit Screenshots

Screenshot of Posit runs on most desktops or on a server and accessed over the webScreenshot of Posit supports authoring HTML, PDF, Word Documents, and slide showsScreenshot of Posit supports interactive graphics with Shiny and ggvisScreenshot of Shiny combines the computational power of R with the interactivity of the modern webScreenshot of Remote Interactive Sessions: Start R and Python processes from Posit Workbench within various systems such as Kubernetes and SLURM with Launcher.Screenshot of Jupyter: Author and edit Python code with Jupyter using the same Posit Workbench infrastructure.