Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, or Oracle Taleo, is a cloud HCM solution with Talent Management solutions. Its talent management solution includes Recruiting, Onboarding, Learning, Career Development, Opportunity Marketplace, Performance Management, Compensation, Succession Planning, etc.
$4
Per Employee Per Month
Pricing
Brassring
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Help Desk
$4.00
Per Employee Per Month
Talent Management
$10.00
Per Employee Per Month
Global HR
$15.00
Per Employee Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Brassring
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
Contact Oracle HCM for detailed pricing information at +1.800.392.2999
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Brassring
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Considered Both Products
Brassring
Verified User
Project Manager
Chose Brassring
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated.
Kenexa fares very poorly in practice against almost anything else. It checks the boxes of raw functionality, and offers wide customization. However, in practice it is a nightmare to use for almost everything. I was not part of the initial implementation, so I am not aware of …
I didn't! However, I have used both SmartSearch and SilkRoadOpenHire extensively. SmartSearch is fantastic for recruiter geeks who really want to find out all the neat things that are available. It's fast, super easy to use, and quite elegant in design. Probably not a good …
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
No answer on this topic
Features
Brassring
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
7.5
11 Ratings
6% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.3
126 Ratings
8% above category average
Job Requisition Management
7.711 Ratings
8.3121 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.410 Ratings
8.3119 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.710 Ratings
8.3112 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
7.711 Ratings
8.7114 Ratings
Customized Application Form
7.111 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
7.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
7.110 Ratings
8.5118 Ratings
Candidate Search
8.310 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
8.310 Ratings
8.9118 Ratings
Collaboration
7.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
7.46 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.710 Ratings
8.8121 Ratings
Reporting
7.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
176 Ratings
7% above category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.6165 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
9.1174 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.7167 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
8.9157 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
8.4159 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.8164 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
8.4124 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
119 Ratings
7% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.1106 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
8.594 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
8.332 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.7108 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.0100 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
8.9109 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
8.291 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.9
122 Ratings
8% above category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
8.8118 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
8.9122 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
8.8114 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.8
156 Ratings
7% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
8.6135 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
8.9155 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
8.4115 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
9.0107 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
8.9152 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.6
70 Ratings
8% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
8.670 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.7
157 Ratings
14% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
9.0155 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
8.9152 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.2141 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.8
125 Ratings
10% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
8.9122 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.7119 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.2
125 Ratings
2% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.6119 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.5121 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.4111 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
8.5124 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Brassring
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
8.6
138 Ratings
8% above category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.4136 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.5121 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
8.3131 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.4123 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
8.4120 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
Oracle HCM is very much helpful and well suited in the recruitment and placement process and HR data. It makes it easier for HR in [organizations] to keep track of who is in and out of the [organization]. Improvement can be made by allowing employees to record their own data and update it as and when necessary without having to go through HR first.
Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
Government entities share data readily on applicants and HCM doesn't make it easy to have applications transferred between organizations. If applicants could apply once and send that application to multiple entities that would really make it more appealing to clients. This is a niche that is currently filled with NEOGOV, however Oracle's analytics are far superior to those in NEOGOV
There are no customizations allowed so clients need to work within the configuration standards or create a bolt on. Many times your greatest asset is also one of your biggest weaknesses.
Oracle is a large company and sometimes it can be hard to navigate the support matrix that they have set up. They also have tiers of support so you can pay more to get more, which isn't optimal from a customer point of view.
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
Taleo does what we need it to do and based on the costs from both a time and money perspective, I don't see us changing anytime soon. If anything I think we will look to leverage the capabilities available that we may not already be using.
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
After the initial training's, it was quite intuitive to use the application. The application is based upon best practices and the overall flows are quite logical. The train stop approach also ensures that users understand where they are in the process cycle. Also, the number of clicks have been greatly rationalized to ensure that there is more streamlined experience.
It works well. However we recently discovered that it no longer is supported on Internet Explorer so we had to change the default browser for everyone in our organization to MS Edge.
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
The rating is based upon our current level of support. The overall experience has vastly changed since we moved into product paid support. 'Also, with Oracle going with the model of quarterly patches, it makes sense to have the product company provide support to the overall application thereby eliminating the problems of bugs.
There is a lot of potential on Fusion. We have reaped about 10% of potential benefits. Especially on Workforce Intelligence, the opportunities are huge. The reason why we do not use the solution at its full potential is not in the product (which is simple and transparent). A roadmap is under construction to bring more of its potential to the end user.
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated
Firstly, create a template for the data of human resources to be filled by the client with help from us, then We transformed the paperwork, excel, word sheets, did data cleansing and refined the data, and matched data with the correct fields inside the template and imported the data to oracle cloud hcm by using human capital management data loader
We were not good at tracking any numbers around recruiting so now this last year we have been able to set the benchmark that we now can work toward improving.
At any given time, we could not say how many open positions we had. Now we are able to keep track of that.
We do a much better job with communicating with candidates now, especially the ones not selected. This will help us maintain a better reputation and attract the candidates back for other jobs they may be a better fit for in the future.