JAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score4.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
JAGGAER
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JAGGAER
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
JAGGAER
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
34% below category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
9% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
7.014 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
8.012 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
3.09 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
8.97 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
21% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.95 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Feature
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
23% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
9.95 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of JAGGAER and Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
As a purchasing app, it is excellent. I cannot speak to its usefulness in the AP area. it may be less useful in a different environment, such as manufacturing. For research and healthcare use, it is excellent. Also, we use Banner as our ERP. SciQuest is well versed with integrating with Banner. Users with a different ERP may experience less pleasant results.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Source to settle: Although we did not purchase all the new applications in the suite SciQuest made, what we did use, worked and worked nicely. With SciQuest you can get a turn-key system.
I love the way SciQuest rolls out changes, measuring customer feedback, and rolling out major changes 3 times a year. Like clockwork you know what to expect ahead of time, deciding whether or not you need a particular enhancement (if optional), having plenty of time to make adjustments in business processes if needed, and/or user-base announcements.
I was always astonished to see both clients and potential clients come to the conferences. SciQuest would allow the "mixing" of clients and potential clients, apparently unafraid of any negative commentaries the potential clients might get. That has always been impressive to me as a techie myself.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Their existing pricing model for the number of Suppliers onboarded or removed has been a little disappointing as there are times when suppliers do have to be switched out.
They have greatly helped in making UNSPSC updating easier, but I would like to be able to get an extract with a delta that would make it easier for us to update our ERP as this information needs to be stored on both sides.
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Simplified and user friendly system that has been implemented across our entire institute and with all of our vendors. We really like this program and it works well for us. Changing to another program would be a significant time investment and hassle
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
They usually respond to medium-to-low priority issues very quickly, and high priority issues almost instantly. Their support team is knowledgeable and responsive. Their Supplier Enablement team is very good and is a feature that most of their competitors don't have. The company makes a serious effort to maintain good relationships with their customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
Again, our SciQuest system integrates with Banner. Banner does have a way to create, approve and report on POs. However, the SciQuest product is so much more user friendly, so the learning curve is very steep. Also, SciQuest gives us a lot more detail in our reporting and PO history, which is helpful when trying to remember what happened 6 month ago
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info