JW Player (or JWP) is a video platform boasting 40,000 broadcasters, publishers, and other video-driven brands whose business relies on video as users. It provides these companies with a way to accelerate and scale their video strategy and is a video platform that can be used to stream video, engage audiences on any screen, and monetize content.
N/A
Net-Results
Score8.1 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Net-Results is a marketing automation solution that features segment-driven approaches to lead management and marketing automation. Some key features include support for A/B email testing, drag & drop landing pages, CRM integrations, and automated marketing workflows.
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Pricing
JW Player
Net-Results
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
One Price Full Platform
$800
Annual agreement, up to 25,000 Contacts or 60,000 Sends
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JW Player
Net-Results
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Tiered pricing by total email sends or total contacts, you decide. All features included. No upsells or limitations based on your price.
More Pricing Information
Features
JW Player
Net-Results
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Net-Results
-
Ratings
Support for advertisements
9.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video SEO
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
7.8
3 Ratings
9% below category average
Net-Results
-
Ratings
Video access controls
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
User management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video link sharing
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
External video
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
7.0
3 Ratings
16% below category average
Net-Results
-
Ratings
Player customization
2.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded videos
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile compatibility
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
1.0
3 Ratings
155% below category average
Net-Results
-
Ratings
Per viewer tracking
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Per video tracking
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
8.6
3 Ratings
0% below category average
Net-Results
-
Ratings
On-Demand video
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live streaming
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video upload & format support
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video library / File management
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video portal
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.1
23 Ratings
8% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
7.021 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.214 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.311 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
7.019 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
6.311 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
5.022 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
8.023 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
7.022 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
8.618 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.6
20 Ratings
4% below category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
8.518 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
8.418 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
5.018 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
8.616 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
-
Ratings
Net-Results
7.5
15 Ratings
1% below category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
7.99 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
-
Ratings
Net-Results
6.9
7 Ratings
9% below category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
6.77 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of JW Player and Net-Results
Feature
JW Player
-
Ratings
Net-Results
6.3
22 Ratings
17% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.021 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.022 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.019 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of JW Player and Net-Results
JW Player has flexible plans that won't cost you a lot of money. If you are a startup, JW offers a variety of plans that will suit your specific needs and grow with you as your company grows. You do not need to be a video expert to understand how to upload a video, which allows nearly anyone in the office to do it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Net-Results is very well-suited for small, medium and large businesses. They seem to be more advanced than what a typical enterprise level implementation would require. When selecting a marketing automation provider make it a point to find out the level of integration with Salesforce and other marketing technologies. Do they have pre-built automation modules or does it require building from the ground up? Also ask questions regarding its specific capabilities ... for example: is it a marketing automation provider? is it a CRM provider? etc
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just made the decision to renew given demonstrated improvements being made to the platform to expand compatibility for its player use on devices such as Apple TV, as well as improvements made recently to its JW Platform Dashboard
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reliability and compatibility on a majority of platforms. Would have received a 10 except recent versions of browsers such as Firefox are now defaulting against Flash components and thus prompting approval from users BEFORE loading which is a HUGE obstacle to an effective user experience thus creating concerns by end-users unnecessarily and risking that they will NOT accept the prompts, thus leaving unable to view video content hosted using the JW Player. Assurances by JW support suggest they will resolve this, so we'll see...
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Net Results is pretty easy to use and understand. I wouldn't say that it is the best in comparison to MailChimp's drag and drop email builder, but Net Results do so much more than MailChimp that it is hard to even compare the two. Overall Net Results has good usability
Support is reasonable. I from time to time have made suggestions on improvements that would be nice to see (like the ability to have a clickable link within the video - that is easy to create, without tons of coding) and it seems as though I never see it happen or get much response to "suggestions" to upgrade the software. The good news, other than a few things as I mentioned above, overall, I don't have many "technical issues" in the platform, which is a good thing. On occasion, I have seen some "issues" with the delivery of the video, but it has been pretty scarce. So it is dependable.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One of the primary features promoted by JW Platform is its SEO definition. However, there did not seem to be a way to integrate that data to our platform if selected thus only leaving the benefits of that data to be established on the individual video page hosted by JW Platform, which isn't useful in the end to the client value we are trying to deliver for our VideoproFile.net solution
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
JW had more player options, a better/more intuitive user interface, was altogether faster both in rendering the uploaded videos and in time to load on the web page. The integration with OpenX for pre-roll was faster and easier than with Brightcove, and lastly, they offered a great price for service.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We've used ClickDimensions and Marketo. We felt that ClickDimensions was more limited as far as creating effective email campaigns and not as easy to use. It also is completely native to Dynamics CRM, which can be a positive and a negative. Marketo was the previous solution we owned, we are much happier with Net-Results. It's easier to use, not as complex and there is much better communication from their support team. When looking at a new solution we also looked at Act-On and Hubspot. Act-On probably would've been our second choice, but it didn't have as modern of a feel and wasn't quite as easy to use. Hubspot didn't really fit our business. It was very focused on SEO and blog posts. It didn't have the features we needed from a marketing standpoint
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Stronger re-engagement rates - The buy cycle for our product can be very long. Net-Results helps us keep in touch with prospects that may have gone cold.
Better asset utilization - Net-Results helps us drive continuous utilization of our assets.
Efficiency - The automation Net-Results has provided means we can focus on other tasks, like creating new assets or building new partnerships.