Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Metadata.io
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Based in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.
$24,000
per year
Pipedrive
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Pipedrive is a customer relationship management (CRM) software built to help small teams to drive sales.
$24
per month
Pricing
Metadata.ioPipedrive
Editions & Modules
MetaMatch
$295
per month per installation
Web Personalization
$24,000
per year
Audience Targeting
$24,000
per year
Metadata Base Platform
$60,000
per year
Essential
$14
per month (billed annually)
Advanced
$29
per month (billed annually)
Professional
$49
per month (billed annually)
Power
$64
per month (billed annually)
Enterprise
$99
per month (billed annually)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Metadata.ioPipedrive
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$2,500 one-time fee per installationNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMonthly plans are available. The Essentials monthly plan at $24 per month.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Metadata.ioPipedrive
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Metadata.ioPipedrive
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
6.3
59 Ratings
20% below category average
Customer data management / contact management00 Ratings6.515 Ratings
Workflow management00 Ratings7.812 Ratings
Territory management00 Ratings6.68 Ratings
Opportunity management00 Ratings8.857 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)00 Ratings7.355 Ratings
Contract management00 Ratings3.09 Ratings
Quote & order management00 Ratings5.17 Ratings
Interaction tracking00 Ratings7.113 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management00 Ratings4.39 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
2.9
7 Ratings
89% below category average
Case management00 Ratings4.76 Ratings
Call center management00 Ratings1.15 Ratings
Help desk management00 Ratings3.16 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
8.5
40 Ratings
12% above category average
Lead management00 Ratings8.440 Ratings
Email marketing00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
7.1
58 Ratings
7% below category average
Task management00 Ratings9.055 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management00 Ratings4.15 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings8.254 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
5.1
60 Ratings
40% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings5.111 Ratings
Pipeline visualization00 Ratings8.660 Ratings
Customizable reports00 Ratings1.78 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
6.1
56 Ratings
22% below category average
Custom fields00 Ratings7.256 Ratings
Custom objects00 Ratings7.746 Ratings
Scripting environment00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings8.539 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
7.3
54 Ratings
13% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings6.112 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.552 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
1.1
5 Ratings
147% below category average
Social data00 Ratings1.15 Ratings
Social engagement00 Ratings1.15 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
3.6
7 Ratings
66% below category average
Marketing automation00 Ratings3.67 Ratings
Compensation management00 Ratings3.54 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
Metadata.io
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
8.2
53 Ratings
9% above category average
Mobile access00 Ratings8.253 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Metadata.ioPipedrive
Small Businesses
Sitecore Send
Sitecore Send
Score 9.9 out of 10
Salesmate
Salesmate
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Metadata.ioPipedrive
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(21 ratings)
8.9
(63 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(16 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(15 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.8
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Metadata.ioPipedrive
Likelihood to Recommend
Metadata, Inc
Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
Pipedrive's lead management features are top-notch, particularly the ability to automate email correspondence and receive alerts when necessary. It has an excellent pipeline, opportunity management, and sales automation without coding: —Exceptional cost-effectiveness. —User-friendliness. —Usability. —Top-notch search filter. However, its speed could be increased because adding new actions requires numerous taps and swipes.
Read full review
Pros
Metadata, Inc
  • Best paid ops tool I've ever used (and I've used a lot): we can launch a new LinkedIn & Facebook campaign in minutes.
  • Lead gen ops: no more dealing with broken zapier zaps, we are able to automate pushing native lead gen leads directly to our CRM.
  • Attribution: see influenced & triggered opportunities/CW deals
  • Multivariate testing: Metadata scales audience, ad, creative testing so you learn what performs much faster than manual process
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
  • Great visual visibility of the funnel plus easy to drag the deals across the stages
  • The email integration that collects all relevant communication (also through the possibility of adding a deal-specific Pipedrive address on BCC)
  • The integration with Pandadoc, which we use a lot, so that Pipedrive keeps a really handy overview of the documents we have sent out / which have been signed
Read full review
Cons
Metadata, Inc
  • If you don't have a large budget and audience it's hard to meaningfully optimize. If I have 4 ad creatives, to 2 audience groups on FB and LinkedIn, that creates 16 experiments, each of which needs an ample enough budget, say $40/day, that's now $640 per day or $19K per month.
  • Limited ability to edit ads after they've been launched. You usually have to stop the ad, clone it, and launch a new campaign.
  • Can't add new ads to existing campaigns which limits the ability to optimize. If I start an MD campaign with 4 ads, and in a few weeks we see that one is working well and the other 2 are not performing, I can pause those (or it can autopause by rules), but I can't add 2 more new creatives to the mix against the high performer. I'd have to either stop the high performer, and recreate it in a new campaign (losing likes and comments), OR - leave the high performer in the first campaign, and create. a second campaign with the new ones, which will only optimize against each other.
  • Limited to a single conversion event on a landing page. I'm not able to choose either a Demo Request OR a Sign-Up conversion, I can only choose one.
  • Google search ads are doable but aren't necessarily more feature-rich or easy-to use than native, so there's no value added to doing it through Metadata in my opinion aside from unifying ad reporting.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
  • Showing the customers name on the pipeline page. Right now I can only get it to show the brand name twice. I wish it would replace the second brand name with the main point of contact.
  • Better reporting tools. Their reporting tools are not easy to pick up. I've spent time trying to figure it out and it isn't something I can pick up on quickly.
  • Better training options. I wish I had a personal trainer to walk me through the best way to use Pipedrive so I can get the most out of it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Metadata, Inc
No answers on this topic
Pipedrive Inc.
-2 for Its cost and +8 for the need of tracking of leads and monitoring of team.
Read full review
Usability
Metadata, Inc
No answers on this topic
Pipedrive Inc.
There is a learning curve that caused a slow adoption but overall the UI looks great and the support is helpful when there is an issue that you need to be addressed. The marketplace integrations (developed by Pipedrive) could definitely use some work as they're not as seamless as we'd hoped for!
Read full review
Support Rating
Metadata, Inc
Metadata's customer support is a difference-maker! They really do care how well your campaigns perform and will help you improve them.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
Between quick video tutorials and having very quick feedback from their support teams, it is one of the main reasons I would recommend Pipedrive. It is critical, especially when setting up the platform to meet your companies needs, that a solid support team like Pipedrive has is there to make the transition easier.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Metadata, Inc
No answers on this topic
Pipedrive Inc.
Experiment is the only way to start
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Metadata, Inc
We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't want to pay for features we weren't going to use.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
I much prefer the interface of Pipedive when compared to Zoho. Much more user friendly and the team is always readily available when we need them. Pipedrive allowed for many custom integrations to be added, as Zoho was a tad more complicated to manipulate. We would not go back to Zoho in any case.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Metadata, Inc
  • Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
  • Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
  • 90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
  • Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
  • Pipedrive has had an extremely positive impact on our overall business objectives. More specifically, the return on investment has been magnified by the fact that it is fairly inexpensive.
  • I can recall 2-3 conversations which prompted my boss and myself to note how convenient Pipedrive is.
  • Like most companies, it can often feel like we are spinning many plates at once. Even when our team is not able to connect in person every day, our projects are capable of progressing. Pipedrive has allowed us to press forward where we (normally) would have lacked the communication necessary in doing so.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Metadata.io Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Pipedrive Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of