TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Access vs. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service vs. MySQL

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Access

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools.

    $139.99

    per PC

    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service is designed to create positive experiences through any channel and on any device to exceed customer expectations.

    $50

    per month per user

    MySQL

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AMySQL is a popular open-source relational and embedded database, now owned by Oracle.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer ServiceMySQL
    Editions & Modules
    Microsoft Access
    $139.99
    per PC
    Dynamics 365 Customer Service Professional
    $50
    per month per user
    Add-In - Chat
    $60
    per month per user
    Dynamics 365 Customer Service Enterprise
    $105
    per month per user
    Dynamics 365 Customer Service Premium
    $195
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer ServiceMySQL
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer ServiceMySQL
    Considered Multiple Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Access
    SharePoint lists
    MySQL
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Tableau is not even a 'switch-out' tool, it's for visualization so it's not a fair comparison. Against other databasing tools, MySQL is still my favorite may be simply due to being a creature of comfort because that's where I first learned to manage DB. However, Microsoft …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Microsoft Access databases are more suitable for us because we are a smaller team. It's easy for us to export the reporting. It's also easy for people to create their own databases as well! Microsoft Access is honestly a one-stop-shop for us, and we figured we were not at a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    I would prefer MySQL for larger data sets, but Microsoft Access is all around better than Apache OpenOffice.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Microsoft Access is better for novice users. It is very user-friendly and helps beginners learn data base rather than MySQL. MySQL is for more advanced users which have more experience. Access is also good for smaller organizations. It saves money rather than spending more on …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    C#, ASP.NET, SQL server
    Included with our office 365 licenses
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    [Selected Microsoft Access for] employee learning simplicity, attractive graphical environment and features of Microsoft 365 with responsive Microsoft support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Microsoft Access is a bit dated compared to other database tools. It is slower, not able to handle quantities of data that are as large as the other tools, and a bit more finicky. However, it is sometimes the preferred tool for some clients. It also has a lower barrier to entry …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    MS Access is the little brother to all these products. In no way is it as feature-rich as the competition I have selected. It is, however, great when used properly. It does not have the same level of security, availability, access, or recoverability as anything listed above. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Access should be relatively cost effective because it is included in the MS office 365. But it is not suitable for larger organization due to lack of work sharing environment.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    We selected Microsoft Access for its lower price and because it is easy to use for any user. Previously in the company, because we were small, Excel was used and I can migrate my data from Excel to Access in a fast and simple way. Besides that, it has organized information that …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Microsoft Access is a good data management tool. and it excels in that area, which is what we needed the most. It was simple to use and easy to learn. Database management can be done with multiple users in Access. And we can have reports for data summaries, or for any specific …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    I find access easier to use than base or thunderbird but if you are familiar with Microsoft Office products, the learning curve is lessened by that. There is no comparision to SQL or MySql, but these are meant for larger more robust database applications. Access was actually in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Access
    Microsoft Access can be used on the Windows platform, which most organizations use, especially our own, which is one of the reasons why we selected Microsoft Access. Access was also part of the standard Windows image that our company uses when imaging desktops and laptops so …
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    Chose MySQL
    It would be hard to make a case for the use of Microsoft Access for any but the most simple of internal business applications at this stage, not because it is a bad product but it falls well short of the power and scalability of MySQL and almost any other databse solution out …
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    We use Oracle Database for another business unit and in the recent past I’ve used Microsoft Access. While every relational database has its positives and negatives, MySQL has proven to be the fastest and most reliable. Its automated backups have saved us time in redoing mass …
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    Our original implementation of MySQL was to replace an Access database that had unfortunately been able to grow beyond its abilities and scope. MySQL seemed to offer all the benefits of Access (easy to set up, use and administer) with none of the downsides (reliability, …
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    MySQL has a GUI which makes it easy for developers to work upon. It has all features like replication, backup and crash recovery. Also since it is freely available it becomes commercially feasible for people to use this DB. Also MySQL can be easily used as a back end for the …
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    Familiarity: With MySQL, I know what to expect, and that goes a long way. Also, since it adheres fairly close to SQL '92, It's relatively easy to construct queries, views, etc. without a steep learning curve. Also, RAM usage is important (this is true of any RDBMS …
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    SQLLite was not a choice on Trust Radius, and it is the only tool that I have used similar to MySQL and the use was several years ago, so I do not remember the exact reason but there was some function that I needed that SQLite could not perform, and I had to download MySQL to …
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    MySQL is much better. It is much more scalable.
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    Cuts down seperate charges for additional databases as in Microsoft SQL Server. It is an open source software compared to other database management systems.
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    I feel it's way more user friendly than the previous software.
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    Compared to Oracle MySQL is lacking some of the advanced features Oracle provides but through a detailed business and technical requirements capture process it became clear we would not need these very advanced features. Oracle is stronger on the backup and restore side of …
    Incentivized
    Chose MySQL
    MySQL is much more in depth. Microsoft is more for intermediate users while MySQL has a larger of amount of activities one can do.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    29 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Would buy again
    49 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    29 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    51 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    51 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    86%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    19 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    36 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    46 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer ServiceMySQL
    Relational Databases
    Comparison of Relational Databases features of Microsoft Access and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service and MySQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Access
    7.7
    3 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service
    -
    Ratings
    MySQL
    -
    Ratings
    ACID compliance7.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database monitoring8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database locking8.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Encryption7.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Disaster recovery7.73 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple datatypes8.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incident and problem management
    Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Microsoft Access and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service and MySQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Access
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service
    7.4
    3 Ratings
    10% below category average
    MySQL
    -
    Ratings
    Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Expert directory00 Ratings1.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings6.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ticket creation and submission00 Ratings10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ticket response00 Ratings10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self Help Community
    Comparison of Self Help Community features of Microsoft Access and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service and MySQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Access
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service
    4.5
    3 Ratings
    56% below category average
    MySQL
    -
    Ratings
    External knowledge base00 Ratings4.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledge base00 Ratings4.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-Channel Help
    Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Microsoft Access and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service and MySQL
    Feature
    Microsoft Access
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service
    8.0
    3 Ratings
    0% below category average
    MySQL
    -
    Ratings
    Customer portal00 Ratings9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    IVR00 Ratings5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Social integration00 Ratings5.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email support00 Ratings10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Help Desk CRM integration00 Ratings9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer ServiceMySQL
    Small Businesses
    Amazon RDS
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Help Scout
    Score9.3 out of 10
    MariaDB Platform
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    SingleStore
    Score8.2 out of 10
    LiveAgent
    Score8.8 out of 10
    PostgreSQL
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SAP IQ
    Score5.5 out of 10
    Front
    Score9.2 out of 10
    SQLite
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer ServiceMySQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.4
    (102 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.5
    (146 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    7.6
    (8 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    7.9
    (18 ratings)
    Availability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.4
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft AccessMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer ServiceMySQL
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    As a Material Purchasing/Planning/inventory tracking application, Microsoft Access serves its purpose well. It's presentation is clean, data entry is simple and the ability to customize search fields is welcome. It does, however, come with some caveats; namely, when setting search filters and the need arises to back up a step or two, with Microsoft Access you have to reset, or "clear all", adding extra steps/time to a query.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Suitable for ticketing that might also require routing to 'queues' and capturing communication timelines. Not as suitable for heavily credentials-management-type organizations or organizations that are not on the Microsoft stack. Also, not as suitable for organizations that have very high needs for knowledge base management or organizations that do not have resources or a partner to help extend the capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    MySQL is best suited for applications on platform like high-traffic content-driven websites, small-scale web apps, data warehouses which regards light analytical workloads. However its less suited for areas like enterprise data warehouse, OLAP cubes, large-scale reporting, applications requiring flexible or semi-structured data like event logging systems, product configurations, dynamic forms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Very easy to create entity-relationship diagrams for various tables and designing mock layouts.
    • Really easy to navigate as it hold[s] the classic Microsoft UI. Another good thing is that it comes with the complete MS Office Suite.
    • It is really fast when joining multiple tables no matter what type of join.
    • Works on pretty much same SQL scripts so no need to learn a new language!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Routing
    • Different Channel Support
    • Intuitive user interface
    • Continues improvement in the product
    • Integration with other Microsoft services and products
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Stable - it just runs, with minimal downtime or errors
    • Fast - well-structured data is quickly written and read
    • Secure - MySQL is easy to keep data secure from people and applications that shouldn't see it
    • Easy to use - SQL is industry standard so no problems with adding, editing and reading data stored in MySQL
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft Access has not really changed at all for several years. It might be nice to see some upgrades and changes.
    • The help info is often not helpful. Need more tutorials for Microsoft Access to show how to do specific things.
    • Be careful naming objects such as tables, forms, etc. Names that are too long can get cut off in dialog boxes to choose a table, form, report, etc. So, I wish they would have resizable dialog boxes to allow you to see objects with long names.
    • I wish it could show me objects that are not in use in the database for current queries, tables, reports, forms, and macros. That way unused objects can be deleted without worrying about losing a report or query because you deleted the underlying object.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It occasionally crashes or slow down, but it usually works great.
    • Costly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Learning curve: is big. Newbies will face problems in understanding the platform initially. However, with plenty of online resources, one can easily find solutions to problems and learn on the go.
    • Backup and restore: MySQL is not very seamless. Although the data is never ruptured or missed, the process involved is not very much user-friendly. Maybe, a new command-line interface for only the backup-restore functionality shall be set up again to make this very important step much easier to perform and maintain.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    I and the rest of my team will renew our Microsoft Access in the future because we use and maintain many different applications and databases created using Microsoft Access so we will need to maintain them in the future. Additionally, it is a standard at our place of work so it is at $0 cost to us to use. Another reason for renewing Microsoft Access is that we just don' t have the resources needed to extend into a network of users so we need to remain a single-desktop application at this time.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    For teaching Databases and SQL, I would definitely continue to use MySQL. It provides a good, solid foundation to learn about databases. Also to learn about the SQL language and how it works with the creation, insertion, deletion, updating, and manipulation of data, tables, and databases. This SQL language is a foundation and can be used to learn many other database related concepts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Access is easy to use. It is compatible with spreadsheets. It is a very good data management tool. There is scope to save a large amount of data in one place. For using this database, one does not need much training, can be shared among multiple users. This database has to sort and filtering features which seem to be very useful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It's not as simple as some of the other offerings, but it is fairly intuitive. The design philosophy is a little more bloated, but it can be streamlined by customizing views and forms (pages) to be organized for end users. Once it is set up, though, assuming your UI choices and design are intuitive, it is simple for end users to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I give MySQL a 9/10 overall because I really like it but I feel like there are a lot of tech people who would hate it if I gave it a 10/10. I've never had any problems with it or reached any of its limitations but I know a few people who have so I can't give it a 10/10 based on those complaints.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    I don't think the program has ever failed me. It is one of those programs where there is always a solution if you know where to look.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    While I have never contacted Microsoft directly for product support, for some reason there's a real prejudice against MS Access among most IT support professionals. They are usually discouraging when it comes to using MS Access. Most of this is due to their lack of understanding of MS Access and how it can improve one's productivity. If Microsoft invested more resources towards enhancing and promoting the use of MS Access then maybe things would be different.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    We have never contacted MySQL enterprise support team for any issues related to MySQL. This is because we have been using primarily the MySQL Server community edition and have been using the MySQL support forums for any questions and practical guidance that we needed before and during the technical implementations. Overall, the support community has been very helpful and allowed us to make the most out of the community edition.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    there is no key idea, since it is easy to implement Microsoft Access
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    1. Estimate your data size. 2. Test, test, and test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Excel is a fantastic - robust application that can do so much so easily. Its easy to train and understand. However - excel does not provide a reporting function and that is typically where we will suggest a move to [Microsoft] Access. [Microsoft] Access requires a little more knowledge of data manipulation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I have worked with Oracle CRM On Demand earlier, mainly for case management and basic customer support workflows. Oracle CRM was stable and worked fine for standard use cases, but customization was limited and changes usually required more effort and time. Integrations with other systems were also not very flexible.
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Customer Service is much stronger in terms of flexibility and scalability. The biggest advantage is tight integration with the Microsoft ecosystem like Outlook, Teams, Power Automate, and Power Apps, which makes automation and productivity much better. Case management, SLAs, queues, and omnichannel features are more advanced and easier to configure.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    MongoDB has a dynamic schema for how data is stored in 'documents' whereas MySQL is more structured with tables, columns, and rows. MongoDB was built for high availability whereas MySQL can be a challenge when it comes to replication of the data and making everything redundant in the event of a DR or outage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Not having to recreate queries or reports every time you want to use them.
    • Once an item is created and saved as part of the database, you save manpower by not having to recreate them.
    • ROI from a usability standpoint is great. Solid product with great functionality that requires low maintenance usually.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Creativity way.
    • Foster increase in revenue.
    • Improving decision-making.
    • Culture of good relationship/service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • As it is an open source solution through community solution, we can use it in a multitude of projects without cost license
    • The acquisition by Oracle makes you need to contract support for the enterprise version
    • If you have knowledge about oracle databases, you can get more out of the enterprise version
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots