Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing.
$14
per month per user
QlikView
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
QlikView® is Qlik®’s original BI offering designed primarily for shared business intelligence reports and data visualizations. It offers guided exploration and discovery, collaborative analytics for sharing insight, and agile development and deployment.N/A
UiPath Automation Platform
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
UiPath's agentic platform combines the company's Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solution for automating repetitive tasks with agentic automation. By unifying agentic AI, automation, BPM, and process intelligence, the platform gives organizations control to design, run, and optimize new agentic processes.
$25
per month (for 1 user with basic tier features)
Pricing
Microsoft BI (MSBI)QlikViewUiPath Automation Platform
Editions & Modules
Power BI Pro
$14
per month per user
Power BI Premium
$24
per month per user
QlikView
Custom
per user
Automation Cloud Basic
$25
per month 1 user, 1 basic platform tier
Automation Cloud Enterprise
Contact Sales
Enterprise Medium Business
Contact Sales
Automation Cloud Standard
Contact Sales
Automation Cloud Basic
starting at $25
per month 1 user, 1 basic platform tier
Automation Suite
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)QlikViewUiPath Automation Platform
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOn an perpetual license basis, based on server plus number of users. Contact vendor for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft BI (MSBI)QlikViewUiPath Automation Platform
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Specific data displays are some of the strongest aspects of Microsoft BI when compared to alternate programs. It also does a superior job in compatibility with many programs, especially those from Microsoft. Since my company primarily uses Office 365 and other Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
The software stacks [well] because it has more graphics resolution and the colors are fresh and actualized. On the other hand, there is the Microsoft family software and this is an advantage. Microsoft has a lot of users around the world and it's like everyone knows how to do …
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
One of the main reasons Microsoft BI was chosen by our company is because it is a reliable program. We tried different programs in the past (and currently also use other ones for certain reporting and analysis needs) but Microsoft BI was the least buggy out of our top choices.
Chose Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Looking at the visualization portion of BI, there are three types of tools.
  1. Programming packages. Free and powerful, they let you make any diagram, at the cost of difficulty of use.
  2. Specialist software like Tableau and Microsoft BI. This is the best choice in most cases due to …
QlikView
Chose QlikView
I was forced into QV by QuickBooks -- I did not have the opportunity to evaluate it specifically against other packages.
I have, however, seen Microsoft BI and BIRST --- both of which seem much more expensive (and perhaps complex) than QlikView. But I'm conjecturing a bit here.
UiPath Automation Platform
Chose UiPath Automation Platform
UIPath is easier to learn and also has a greater community that helps you no matter what the issue is; they always have an answer. The support of this software is also the best. The OCR is quite powerful, and you have a lot of options with the OCR engine, so in that way you can …
Features
Microsoft BI (MSBI)QlikViewUiPath Automation Platform
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.2
52 Ratings
12% above category average
QlikView
8.5
68 Ratings
4% above category average
UiPath Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports9.045 Ratings8.050 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.552 Ratings9.466 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates9.250 Ratings8.060 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.7
52 Ratings
8% above category average
QlikView
8.1
67 Ratings
1% above category average
UiPath Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis8.747 Ratings8.366 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.452 Ratings7.767 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages9.041 Ratings8.336 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.752 Ratings8.262 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.8
51 Ratings
7% above category average
QlikView
8.6
62 Ratings
5% above category average
UiPath Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Publish to Web9.247 Ratings8.049 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.047 Ratings9.056 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.243 Ratings7.542 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling9.046 Ratings10.048 Ratings00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers8.626 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.9
51 Ratings
11% above category average
QlikView
7.4
58 Ratings
8% below category average
UiPath Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.550 Ratings7.955 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.247 Ratings7.546 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics8.344 Ratings6.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.55 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.3
52 Ratings
9% above category average
QlikView
7.0
60 Ratings
19% below category average
UiPath Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)9.549 Ratings8.159 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.246 Ratings5.755 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.049 Ratings5.955 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.25 Ratings8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.531 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.3
41 Ratings
7% above category average
QlikView
8.0
47 Ratings
3% above category average
UiPath Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.338 Ratings8.044 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.329 Ratings9.028 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.338 Ratings8.038 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.6
24 Ratings
11% above category average
QlikView
-
Ratings
UiPath Automation Platform
-
Ratings
REST API9.321 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API9.021 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames9.020 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API8.918 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)8.221 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)7.619 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft BI (MSBI)QlikViewUiPath Automation Platform
Small Businesses
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
SAP Extension Suite (discontinued)
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
SAP Build
SAP Build
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)QlikViewUiPath Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(73 ratings)
7.7
(88 ratings)
8.6
(195 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(25 ratings)
8.8
(29 ratings)
8.0
(8 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(15 ratings)
8.0
(15 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
Availability
9.5
(2 ratings)
9.8
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(15 ratings)
3.3
(15 ratings)
8.0
(82 ratings)
In-Person Training
6.9
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.5
(2 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.6
(7 ratings)
7.4
(13 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft BI (MSBI)QlikViewUiPath Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft BI has a lot of features and is a very powerful tool, especially if you have folks on your team that know how to utilize all of its capabilities. To truly unlock all that it can do, it does require people to have a deep understanding of its capabilities. That's where the software really shines. If you are looking for a simpler, more basic reporting tool, there are other programs available that do not require such a steep learning curve.
Read full review
Qlik
Sales data validations have helped manage our justifications in the past, especially with regard to new product development and new business introduction. It has also been helpful in identifying trends with business impact and direction specific to quarter and monthly sales from ERP data as well as decisions to purchase equipment of staffing based on run rates and product demand.
One thing that can get out of hand is data output - if you aren't careful in your query, you may be overloaded with data dumps and drown in the amount of info you have to filter through. This is a user caution, not a comment on the software itself.
Read full review
UiPath
UiPath Automation Platform is well-suited for automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks such as invoice processing, data entry, and report generation. By using UiPath Automation Platform, employees can focus on more strategic tasks, which leads to increased efficiency. Additionally, UiPath Automation Platform is highly effective at automating rule-based processes, such as financial processes like bank statement reconciliation, account payable, and account receivable processes that follow a set of predetermined rules.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Comparatively easy to use compared to other data analytics solutions, collaborating with other colleagues on data work is simple.
  • Using Visual Studio for database, ETL, reporting, and analytics development save time and money.
  • Transfer of data from one application to another via Excel and comparison of data attributes between applications
  • Dashboard functionality, as well as Python support, are available, allowing you to add additional charts and graphs.
Read full review
Qlik
  • QlikView has a simple, relational data model that's REALLY fast. Filtering and changing data is dead simple results are almost immediately available.
  • The free version of Qlikview is almost completely featured, so you roll a pro-level product out to an entire department for really cheap.
  • QlikView is really flexible--if you can imagine it, you can build it.
Read full review
UiPath
  • UiPath is very simple to learn.
  • Any type of application can be automated (Desktop Application, Web Application and also applications reachable only via remote technologies such as Citrix, Remote Desktop and so on).
  • The writing of a process code takes place entirely through the use of objects. In the event that there were no objects capable of solving a particular problem, it is possible to use some languages of the .net platform such as: VB.net, C#.
  • It is easy to scale the solution by adding more robots to run a process in case the solution requires more performance in the future.
  • It can also be used by functional analysts to design the flow to be automated.
  • An academy is available online where basic and advanced courses can be taken. It is also possible to take a completely free basic certification.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • MSBI designs can work on increasing data processing capabilities enough to handle the huge datasets etc.
  • It would be a lot better if it is a little low on cost.
  • it needs to create opportunities little more than they do regarding customization of some very unique visualization effects
Read full review
Qlik
  • We found that QlikView can be a bit slow in supporting some forms of encryption. It is web-based and we needed to upgrade all of our server to not support the older SSL and TLS 1 protocols, only support TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. However, QlikView could not run with TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3. We had to wait over six months to get a version that would handle the newer TLS versions.
  • There are so many options with QlikView that you can get lost when developing a visualization. There are still items I have not yet figured out, such as labeling a graph with the name of a selected detail item.
  • QlikView works by pulling the data it is going to use for visualization into its database. I am a security reviewer and I need to make certain that PII and PHI is not pulled by QlikView for a visualization, otherwise this could become a reportable indecent.
Read full review
UiPath
  • As I mentioned, Excel automation is not very effective, there are a number of packages to add, but there is nothing as smooth as a good macro.
  • Working with selectors is certainly challenging and UiPath does a good job with that, but there is room for improvement since the interface could be smarter in selecting the right attributes and warn the user if something is not properly setup.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft BI is fundamental to our suite of BI applications. That being said, Northcraft Analytics is focused on delighting our customers, so if the underlying factors of our decision change, we would choose to re-write our BI applications on a different stack. Luckily, mathematics are the fundamental IP of our technology... and is portable across all BI platforms for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Qlik
Ease of use, ability to load from pretty much any data source. today I created an application that loaded time sheets from excel that are not in a table format. With Qlik's "enable transformation steps" I was able to automate loads of multiple spreadsheets and multiple tabs easily. Could not do that with any other tool.
Read full review
UiPath
This platform has so much potential and have been garnering a lot of attention by proving benefits in terms of saving operational and manpower costs. I am sure with minute efforts we were able to achieve our ROI and the same is the case with many of our customers whom we have been working around Digital Automation initiatives.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
The Microsoft BI tools have great usability for both developers and end users alike. For developers familiar with Visual Studio, there is little learning curve. For those not, the single Visual Studio IDE means not having to learn separate tools for each component. For end-users, the web interface for SSRS is simple to navigate with intuitive controls. For ad-hoc analysis, Excel can connect directly to SSAS and provide a pivot table like experience which is familiar to many users. For database development, there is beginning to be some confusion, as there are now three tool choices (VS, SSMS, Azure Data Studio) for developers. I would like to see Azure Data Studio become the superset of SSMS and eventually supplant it.
Read full review
Qlik
QlikView is very easy to implement. The installation is very straight forward. QlikView has several different data connectors that can connect to different data sources very smoothly. The user interface to build the reports is very easy to understand. This helps to have a smaller learning curve. Something very helpful is that QlikView is a browser application for the end users. So, you don't need to install any applications on the user's computer.
Read full review
UiPath
There are two main reasons with this rating 1. UiPath Automation Platform requires the old school type of Change Weather management, Which actually eats a lot of time to manage and roll out the recent changes. There is not something kind of CI/CD when you are developing the things With UiPath Automation Platform. 2. Very high development and maintenance cost, which actually decrease its usability.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
The product has been reliable.
Read full review
Qlik
We have not had any downtime issues with the product nor uncovered any significant bugs
Read full review
UiPath
Its a cloud based platform which is easily available and used
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) can drag at times. We created two report servers and placed them under an F5 load balancer. This configuration has worked well. We have seen sluggish performance at times due to the Windows Firewall.
Read full review
Qlik
It is not a SAAS product.
Read full review
UiPath
It has proved and provided good performance across platforms and technologies.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
MSBI natively has a site that allows you to vote on user enhancements and bug fixes. This allows the largest nagging issues to float to the top and the development team can prioritize accordingly. As mentioned earlier, the large community base of MSBI developers assist technical resources in handling technical questions.
Read full review
Qlik
My experience with the Qlik support team has been somewhat limited, but every interaction I have had with them has been very professional and I received a response quickly. Typically if there is a technical issue, our IT team will follow up. My inquiries are specific to product functionality, and Qlik has been very helpful in clarifying any questions I might have.
Read full review
UiPath
UiPath RPA has an exceptional studio interface. It has been a year and so since I am using UiPath RPA. Whether it is some my personal task to scrape information & links from the Journal or find a specific character string from multiple PDF collection using OCR, UiPath RPA has made its roots to our technological ecosystem
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
This training was more directed toward what the product was capable of rather than actual programming.
Read full review
Qlik
My team attended, but I cannot myself rate, but I think it was good as they've successfully launched a training program at our company themselves for users. It was 3-4 day training.
Read full review
UiPath
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Microsoft
I have used on-line training from Microsoft and from Pragmatic Works. I would recommend Pragmatic Works as the best way to get up to speed quickly, and then use the Microsoft on-line training to deep dive into specific features that you need to get depth with.
Read full review
Qlik
Training was as expected. The demo environments tend to be more fully featured that our own environment, but the training was clear and well delivered.
Read full review
UiPath
Video material supported by text. The training has evolved a lot in the past 3 years to become more attractive. Specific training tracks exist for the different roles in RPA development, where everyone is expected to learn basic development.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
We are a consulting firm and as such our best resources are always billing on client projects. Our internal implementation has weaknesses, but that's true for any company like ours. My rating is based on the product's ease of implementation.
Read full review
Qlik
"Implementation" can mean a few things... so I'm not sure that this is the answer you want.... but here it goes: To me, implementation means: "Is the user interface intuitive and can I produce meaningful reports with ease?" On that score, I'd say YES. The amount of training required was minimal and the results were powerful. The desktop implementation is a simple, "blank" interface just waiting for your creativity. The pre-populated templates give you a reasonable start to any project -- and a good set of objects to "play around with" if you're just getting started. Finally, note that the "implementation" I used was baked into QuickBooks 2016 Enterprise -- called "Advanced Reporting"..... That integration makes it ultra useful and simple.
Read full review
UiPath
The implementation was quick and practical
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We have used the built in ConnectWise Manager reports and custom reports. The reports provide static data. PowerBI shows us live data we can drill down into and easily adjust parameters. It's much more useful than a static PDF report.
Read full review
Qlik
The only other vendor product that I have worked with that provides a similar experience to Qlikview is Tableau. I would recommend Tableau if your use case is to build a fixed dashboard. You can share reports for free without needing to buy additional licenses. I would recommend Qlikview if your users are looking for a more interactive experience. They can create new objects to represent the data which can't be accomplished as easily in Tableau
Read full review
UiPath
As compared to other products, we require programming knowledge and concepts to work but UiPath is for everyone. It provides us extensive event logging at various stages and effective exception handling for applications and business. It increases our agility and enhances the overall productivity further by using the source control SVC. The solution that we implemented is also very scalable in terms of incorporating new requirements.
The open source tools require lots of IT effort in order to set up and maintain over time. UiPath is like a complete package and customer service is also active in terms of solving issues arising while automating procession on a day to day basis.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Qlik
No answers on this topic
UiPath
It can be widely used across various departments regardless of platform the product,processes, use cases are build on.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • As a SaaS provider we see being able to provide self-service BI to our client users as a competitive advantage. In fact the MSSQL enabled BI is a contributing factor to many winning RFPs we have done for prospective client organisations.
  • However MSSQL BI requires extensive knowledge and skills to design and develop data warehouses & data models as a foundation to support business analysts and users to interrogate data effectively and efficiently. Often times we find having strong in-house MSSQL expertise is a bless.
Read full review
Qlik
  • You can use the free desktop version to do a lot of reporting and analysis work more quickly so the ROI is huge
  • QlikView is great at finding outliers such as data entry errors
  • QlikView is great at helping you quickly discover new insights about your business that can prompt you to take action that can immediately affect your cash flow.
Read full review
UiPath
  • We are well on our way to automating our expenses, saving so many hours for project managers and engagement managers.
  • Proofs-of-concept excite our clients, though we are yet to make a sale on a project.
  • UiPath specifically has incited interest with our apprentices and has led them to join the RPA team.
Read full review
ScreenShots

QlikView Screenshots

Screenshot of QlikView Sales DashboardScreenshot of QlikView on all devicesScreenshot of QlikView using mobile touch screen