Microsoft's Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management allows users to use predictive insights and intelligence from AI and Internet of Things (IoT) across planning, production, inventory, warehouse, and transportation management to maximize operational efficiency, product quality, and profitability. It replaces the SCM capabilities of the former Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (Dynamics AX), splitting them off from Dynamics 365 Finance, in order to provide more flexible pricing and…
$180
per month per user
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
Accounts Payable Manager in Finance and Accounting at e+CancerCare (Hospital & Health Care, 201-500 employees)
Chose Microsoft Dynamics SL
We started with QuickBooks Enterprise when our company was young. We quickly outgrew this program as it was not able to accommodate the financial reporting we needed to satisfy our investors. QuickBooks was also very limited in managing our revenue as we grew. We did try Great …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Comparison of Supply Chain Planning features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
8.9
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Custom alerts
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scenario-based planning
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource optimization
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply forecasting
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capacity estimation
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee allocation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply network coordination
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement Management
Comparison of Procurement Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
9.5
3 Ratings
23% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Raw material sourcing
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply market analysis
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost analysis
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense Logging
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Fulfillment Management
Comparison of Order Fulfillment Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
9.7
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Order fulfillment optimization
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Return services
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase order generation
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase order tracking
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier delivery scheduling
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing and product configurations generation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics and Transportation Management
Comparison of Logistics and Transportation Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
8.2
3 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Packaging
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Delivery planning
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Route optimization
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Shipping performance
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fleet management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse & Inventory Management
Comparison of Warehouse & Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
9.7
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Automation of warehouse operations
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory storage
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Stock monitoring
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse asset management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory and price forecasting
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Demand Management
Comparison of Demand Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
9.2
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Demand signal sensing
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Demand forecasting
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer analytics
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory stock optimization
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales and operations planning
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing and promotion tracking
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.219 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
5.815 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.518 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
2.526 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
6.021 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
40 Ratings
18% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
5.532 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.140 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.3
41 Ratings
38% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
3.429 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.139 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.439 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.0
48 Ratings
42% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
6.345 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
5.736 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
6.336 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
5.541 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
4.431 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
4.428 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
2.619 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
3.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
3.214 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
6.07 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
4.721 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
3.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
4.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
4.526 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
2.616 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
3.517 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
3.214 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
6.119 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.2
26 Ratings
54% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
5.524 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
1.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
4.018 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
3.515 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
25 Ratings
69% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
3.718 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
3.721 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
1.012 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
5.025 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
4.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
00 Ratings
3.312 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
00 Ratings
3.37 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Production Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and Microsoft Dynamics GP and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Well suited for Financial management in terms of processes and reporting, well suited for supply chain operations, less appropriate for certain types of businesses, such as rental management.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
D365 SCM is good for the SMB market. has very good UX and integrates with Microsoft products well. It is easier to learn D365 compared to SAP SCM. It can be implemented very fast compared to SAP SCM. Resources to implement D365 are available in the market easily compared to SAP SCM.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info