Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
20 Ratings
15% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.319 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.1
40 Ratings
14% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.932 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.240 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
36% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Dashboards3.529 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.239 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.539 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.2
48 Ratings
37% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.545 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable6.036 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.536 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.628 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support3.019 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.726 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting3.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting4.217 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.914 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking6.424 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.815 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
-
Ratings
Pricing3.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.521 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.325 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.49 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.912 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.57 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
3 Ratings
31% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.7
23 Ratings
19% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings6.022 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.021 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.5
19 Ratings
9% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.015 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
3 Ratings
26% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings6.83 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.13 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
24 Ratings
18% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings7.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings6.023 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
2 Ratings
5% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.6
38 Ratings
22% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.030 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings7.038 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings6.037 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings6.035 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.033 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.3
20 Ratings
9% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings7.017 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings6.014 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
34 Ratings
11% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings7.029 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings8.032 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings6.028 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings6.019 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
6.8
25 Ratings
17% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings6.024 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings6.024 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.0
36 Ratings
17% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings7.034 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings7.032 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.6 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(51 ratings)
8.5
(46 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(7 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
8.2
(16 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Oracle
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Oracle
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The limitation of constrained out of the box dimensions that requires ripping the initial implementation to add the new dimensions is a major drawback.
  • Smartview interface is cumbersome for many.
  • The only financial adapter is available for integration for other modules we have to go with file-based uploads which is cumbersome and not real-time.
  • It is very costly in terms of licensing unlike other Oracle products.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Oracle
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Oracle
It produces consolidated multi currency reports faster and more accurately whilst adding additional pivotal functionality. The Smartview reporting is a key for us and a flagstone of the application
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Oracle
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Oracle
I suggest doubling the time to implement from the initial quote you get from the Sales team. That's always been the case for me for multiple EPMs now. The out-of-the-box functionality of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is pretty robust so I appreciate that and it really helped us get the ball rolling quickly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Oracle
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Oracle
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment