Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Rithum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Rithum
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Rithum is a commerce network that helps brands, suppliers, and retailers work together to deliver connected e-commerce experiences. The Rithum platform helps brands and retailers accelerate growth, optimize channel operations, and scale product offerings.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPRithum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPRithum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPRithum
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPRithum
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Rithum
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.319 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.915 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Rithum
-
Ratings
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Rithum
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.832 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.240 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
Rithum
-
Ratings
Dashboards3.529 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.239 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.539 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
Rithum
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.445 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.936 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.628 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.919 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.726 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting4.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.714 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.5
26 Ratings
48% below category average
Rithum
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking6.224 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.515 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Rithum
-
Ratings
Pricing3.618 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.621 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.225 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.39 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPRithum
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
Vendavo
Vendavo
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPRithum
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(51 ratings)
1.0
(11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPRithum
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
Excellent for marketplace sellers with a lot of products - or those with a high turnover of SKUs. Not well suited to the small seller with only a few SKUs to promote. Also probably not suited to someone who only cares about a single marketplace. The real strength of it comes from managing multiple marketplaces through a single system.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
  • Complex, Yet Simple Navigational Interface: ChannelAdvisor is a beast, but navigating through their platform is relatively straightforward. The overall heirarchy is very well put together.
  • One Feed to Rule Them All: With ChannelAdvisor, all we have to do is connect our inventory to their system once. Instead of having to construct and connect dozens of different product feeds to our internal inventory system, we simply connect to ChannelAdvisor and use the same single feed to build out all others' website templates.
  • Product Mapping Made Easy: Mapping product attribute data across a multitude of unique online marketplaces and digital marketing sites can seem like a daunting task. ChannelAdvisor does a great job of simplifying this process, providing easy-to-understand and manage feed templates containing helpful descriptions and categorization.
  • Business Rules and Lookup Lists: I use these all the time when "transforming" our raw inventory data to the specifications of any given feed. They are extremely helpful and super easy to build.
  • Efficient Product Optimization: Instead of having to deal with the time-consuming task of making minute changes to thousands and thousands of skus, ChannelAdvisor allows you to automate these changes in a matter of minutes. It's much more scalable for our business.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
  • Lack of customization, documentation, tutorials, support for the premium webstore
  • Lack of innovation. My client was told that the basic web store was being replace by the premium web store so they needed to upgrade. In my opinion the basic web store was actually much more flexible and robust than the premium web store. Now (it has been less than 2 years) they are making my client switch from the premium web store to "Shopify" and they are charging more money for this. My client was charged to upgrade each time and the process to upgrade was expensive, time consuming, and very convoluted. ChannelAdvisor needs to invest in their technology and migrate data for ChannelAdvisor changes technology. But the experience as an end user is very frustrating since the way of doing things keep changing and not always for the better result for the customer.
  • Channel Advisor needs better support. Help Desk, knowledge base, etc. there are a lot of things you can do with ChannelAdvisor but it is my experience that nothing is very straight forward and there are many different potential problems you will run into and ChannelAdvisor points the finger at "Google" or "Amazon" or "Ebay" instead of helping solve a problem from end to end.
  • It is quite expensive for what it does. I would not have advised my customer to use their product but they were so entrenched that they had no other choice.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
Without ChannelAdvisor, our business wouldn't be where it is today so the idea of NOT renewing is out of the question. By not renewing we would have to hire more employees and have more of a workload for existing employees. By keeping costs low and employees effecient we have been able to grow exponentially.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
Better control of scope between the resources on both sides involved would allow for better change management.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
Our brand is growing online at a rapid clip, and we wanted a platform that would scale accordingly. The feature that really sold us was the automatic workflows. If we want a certain type of product that's going to a customer in a certain state to ship a certain way, we could make that happen automatically without any human touch! Wow!
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
ChannelAdvisor
  • This is an expensive tool that takes time to implement properly. You have to be ready to absorb costs and in downtime not selling.
  • Once set up well, it has some advantages that help with sale increases and fewer headaches.
  • We now use the same amount of people but have absorbed about 25% more business coming in.
Read full review
ScreenShots