We trialed K2 but thought the interface and features did not stack up to Nintex. Nintex was easier to learn and easier to master than utilizing K2. I am not involved in pricing decisions so I cannot compare cost to the products. Nintex is much easier to operate than InfoPath …
Most of this review compares Nintex Workflow to SharePoint Designer, as that is what it replaces. However, as stated previously, you can use both. Nintex will usually be the tool of choice though, since it is much faster and easier for most tasks. There are only a few things …
Nintex WorkFlows seems to be a lot more user friendly, contrast to using SharePoint Designer. I had to spend a lot of time learning SPD and even more time troubleshooting SPD WorkFlows and InfoPath Forms. Though Microsoft offers lots of information on knowledge base (kbs) and …
The Nintex Platform is a stable, robust, and mature platform. When compared to SharePoint Designer Workflows, Nintex is much easier to use, troubleshoot, and maintain. When compared to Microsoft Flow, Nintex is more deeply integrated into SharePoint and has features like a …
The biggest feature difference we found was the ability to copy and paste a workflow step is missing from SharePoint Designer and available in Nintex. Additionally, Nintex has a wider variety of workflow tasks to choose from and an easier to easier to use designer. Nintex …
What previously stood K2 apart from Nintex was purely the ability to have workflows executed outside of SharePoint. Nintex are due to release a product that resides in Azure that provides this feature as well. K2 should really look into redesigning the development GUIs they are …
Nintex process platform is so easy for non-IT users to use for themselves and automate their day to day workflows, which is a huge success for the overall organization. Browser-based process modeling and WYSIWYG form builder is a great option for non-IT users without steep …
Nintex is better than both. Flow has too many limitations and hidden costs and K2 uses its own workflow engine and I personally feel that the installs of Nintex are much easier because it snaps right into SharePoint.
We compared NINTEX Workflow against K2, but in the end decided to go with NINTEX. After evaluating both solutions we went with NINTEX incited of K2 for several reasons. One of the reasons why we went with NINTEX was the overall cost of the solution; K2 was way more than NINTEX. …
I have much more control over my workflows and have saved many hours of development work since switching to Nintex Workflow. The standard out of the box SharePoint workflow designer does not offer the in-depth functionality that Nintex Workflow does; it is clunky and not very …
Other companies have workflow products, K2 for example, or out of the box SharePoint Designer, or even Visual Studio workflow. But none have been as easy to use with on-screen drag and drop control.
K2 runs on it's own server, which means you generally don't have to worry about migrations, upgrades and things like that. It also has more design UI options - you can use the browser, Visual Studio, or other desktop tools. I believe K2 has a more powerful platform, but Nintex …
I am unfamiliar with K2 today, but back in 2007 K2's product was unpolished and priced beyond our budget. It made it an easy decision to go with Nintex.
We evaluated workflow products from Nintex and K2 and felt that both were comparable. Nintex had a slight better user experience for OOB drag and drop capabilities while K2 offered better customization opportunities. In the end we purchased Nintex since our target audience was …
I haven't used anything else like this. I use different products for workflows and forms, but they aren't listed in the listings for this page. Instead of using it for workflows or forms (deprecated 2 years ago), I use Nintex. For everything else, I have what I need in the …
I'd say that Nintex is a lot easier to configure and identifying errors is less complex than SharePoint Designer. In addition, an alternative that developers may prefer using is Adobe Dreamweaver which is also a web development tool. A third option is Coda, a text editor that …
SharePoint Designer is somewhat inferior when compared to a purpose-built third-party tool like Nintex. Even though Nintex leverages built-in workflow engines (SP2010 and SP2013 depending on platform), it builds on top of that and adds many useful features.
Nintex Forms and Workflow are both very robust tools, but cost for some clients can be prohibitive. Nintex does not provide tools to manage SharePoint sites, lists and libraries.
Both K2 and Nintex provide a powerful platform to build and run business applications that integrate seamlessly with SharePoint; business apps typically consist of workflow, forms, data and reports. The type of business apps range from simple document approval workflows to …
Both Nintex and K2 Blackpearl are great products in their own way, but they are expensive. The pricing models for the SharePoint Online environment is very expensive for how Holiday uses workflows. Nintex's pricing model is by the number of workflows in your tenant, and I …
There really isn't a holistic, complete SharePoint Designer replacement currently. You can utilize several different tools and piece together the functionality of Designer. No one really "selects" SharePoint Designer, it is just a necessary evil. For O365 subscribers, Flow …
SharePoint Designer is the only tool of its kind that I feel 100% comfortable using. Compared to the Nintex workflows/forms, SharePoint Designer has much more increased functionality and ease for an IT-type user like myself. I think it has a much better and easier to navigate …