OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. Plone

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
Plone
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Plone is a free and open source content management system built on top of the Zope application server. Plone can be used for any kind of website, including blogs, internet sites, webshops, and internal websites.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Content Suite PlatformPlone
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformPlone
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Content Suite PlatformPlone
Features
OpenText Content Suite PlatformPlone
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
8.4
7 Ratings
4% above category average
Plone
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Plone
10.0
5 Ratings
20% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Plone
10.0
5 Ratings
25% above category average
API00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Plone
9.4
6 Ratings
19% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings5.05 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Plone
9.4
5 Ratings
23% above category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Content Suite PlatformPlone
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformPlone
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(9 ratings)
10.0
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(11 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Content Suite PlatformPlone
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Great for content management and records even for organizations whose staff are not much experienced in the technical backgrounds as it's easy to use and no previous knowledge on HTML is required. It is great for storing invoices and payment proofs and for organizations dealing with global clients for general use documents.
Read full review
Plone
The larger your organization, the more appropriate Plone will be. This is not to say that Plone is a worse choice for small websites, only that the minimum investment for a Plone site is certainly higher than for other platforms. If you already use Plone for your site and are looking for a redesign or an overhaul, I would only advise switching to a different platform such as WordPress or Drupal if your organization is downsizing. For any other situation, Plone is the natural choice for your growth.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Document Management is being done well since it allows you to put in a corporate folder structure that applies to the business unit you currently work in.
  • Records Management works well in this organisation as it allows you to classify the document according to the file plan, as well as manage it according to the retention schedule for tat file plan.
  • The ability to collaborate on files works really well. You can share with users within your group, as well as allow other users access to the files for either read access to read/write access.
  • Access control of the folder and even individual files allows you to ensure only necessary people can have the right type of access. This is especially welcome in the government environment where document management is of utmost importance.
Read full review
Plone
  • Plone is a folder-based system, organising content in a similar way desktop-users are doing for the last two decades. No need to teach non-tech customers some relational-database like paradigm for content management.
  • Plone is secure. It is the most secure CMS you can get your hands on.
  • Plone is flexible, and makes fast development easy.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
Plone
  • Not everything is configurable or editable by Plone, and when you need to adjust or add custom pieces in, you need to deal with Zope. Zope has an ugly, confusing and difficult UI and structure as a backend.
  • Using 3rd party products is difficult to do - there are a few different ways to get them installed, all of which take a bit of luck to get right.
  • Building custom products for Plone is not fun. You've got to deal with an archaic framework to tie in that is not well documented (there is documentation about many things, but not great documentation and there are a lot of holes in the documentation).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
Plone
We have critical systems running on Plone so will need it in the future.
Free to use since its Open source, so we don't have to worry about licence costs.
We know how to use and develop Plone and it has no limits.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
Plone
Compared to the amount of Plone sites, users and customizations we have in our organization, the amount of support requests and training needed is really small.
The new user interface in Plone 6 is even better, it is super fast, has lots of different blocks for enhancing the page, has flexible layout system and is easy to extend with more features.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
OpenText
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
Plone
Our Plone sites are very robust. We have critical systems on Plone and we have been running sites on Plone for over 20 years with very little unexpected downtime.
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
Plone
Plone is very intensive in its operations, and if not configured well it can be slow. However it is designed and built with speed in mind and with proper use of coding, templates and caching can perform extremely well under high loads. It is capable of scaling to very high load availability environments with no specific coding requirements.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
Plone
There are not too many Plone companies in the world. But the ones who are, are high level professionals
Read full review
In-Person Training
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Plone
I have been participating Plone training and the trainers have always been professional. Materials were good and the instructions clear
Read full review
Online Training
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Plone
Well organized, professional training with good materials and instructions
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
Plone
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this software.
Read full review
Plone
Drupal: Plone is cheaper, so with Drupal is more complex to reach the required ROI. However, Drupal has a lower learning curve WordPress: For our necessities it has a more expensive learning curve than plone. Joomla, is easier to use. However, it have some issues on security and web content where Plone is much better
Read full review
Scalability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Plone
Plone has no limits. We have massive sites and can run them just fine
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we can easily keep documents safe
  • Document collaboration is easy with OpenText
  • We can easily handle invoicing and automation thanks to features such as content capture and imaging.
  • With OpenText Content Suite, there is better file sync and archiving
Read full review
Plone
  • The impact Plone has had at the University of Oshkosh is as follows: this software allows student workers to learn about IT departments and CMS's in a user-friendly way. It gives many students great jobs that look great on their resumes.
  • Since there are great training manuals for Plone, there is increased employee efficient in the workplace. Training doesn't take long, and if there's ever a question, the Plone manual is a great tool to refer to.
  • If an employee using Plone quits, its easy to find someone to replace them with quick training and great resources.
Read full review
ScreenShots