TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText Core Email Threat Protection vs. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Core Email Threat Protection

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AOpenText Core Email Threat Protection defends inbound, outbound, and internal email from phishing, ransomware, and email compromise. The solution combines capabilities of the former Webroot Email Security Powered by Zix (formerly Zix Email Threat Protection) and AppRiver.N/A

    Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps organizations efficiently detect, mitigate and respond to known and unknown advanced threats that target people and VIPs through email. TAP provides unparalleled effectiveness in stopping targeted attacks that use polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and credential-stealing phishing techniques to obtain sensitive information. TAP seamlessly integrates with the Proofpoint secure email gateway (Proofpoint Email Protection) to deliver best…N/A
    Pricing
    OpenText Core Email Threat ProtectionProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText Core Email Threat ProtectionProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText Core Email Threat ProtectionProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Proofpoint
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    69%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    88%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    85%
    Delivers good value for the price
    11 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    77%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    OpenText Core Email Threat ProtectionProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Secure Email Gateway
    Comparison of Secure Email Gateway features of OpenText Core Email Threat Protection and Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Feature
    OpenText Core Email Threat Protection
    7.7
    9 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    -
    Ratings
    Anti-malware10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizability5.38 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Loss Protection9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Detection7.39 Ratings00 Ratings
    Sandboxing7.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    End-to-End Encryption10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management Tools5.49 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText Core Email Threat ProtectionProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Small Businesses
    Sophos Email
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sophos Email
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Exchange
    Score8.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText Core Email Threat ProtectionProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.4
    (60 ratings)
    9.0
    (43 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    5.3
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (29 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.3
    (27 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText Core Email Threat ProtectionProofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    I think that Webroot Email Security is good for small-medium sized businesses who are on a budget for email security. They actually have a great encryption system for outbound email, and so if you bundle those together then it puts everything in the same pane of glass and that is nice. Over the last few years this company was purchased by OpenText, and I have seen some improvements because of that, but this product is not innovating like other emails solutions based on new threats that are emerging. I would say if you have a relatively low volume of inbound email, then this solution would suffice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is a great security application for notifying our team about when our users click on malicious links. It provides a good explanation of the attack scenario, including the Sender, Subject, as well as other users that this attack has been sent to. It is also very useful in helping provide metrics on what types of attacks have been sent to the organization historically.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Makes it easy for those receiving emails to create an account and retrieve the email.
    • Peace of mind knowing emails are secure, and can be tracked.
    • Monitoring inbound email threats is easy.
    • Support has been very quick resolving or explaining support tickets I've created.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    • Impostor email detection is a fantastic feature and works very well.
    • The sandbox feature helps to ensure confidence that their evaluation of the email threat is valid.
    • Easy to use (and understand) dashboard make identifying and managing email threats a breeze.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • The admin interface seems a bit shabby. It's time for a refresher course.
    • Being able to modify our own security word without having to contact Zix.
    • Users may not enjoy needing to log in to access messages through the secure site.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    • Their admin web GUI is cumbersome and unclear in many ways. The learning curve is steep so you have to stay up on things yourself whenever a new feature or service is added.
    • They sometimes add a feature to their toolbox without informing their customers. This is true even when the feature added does not cost extra.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    It did delivers exactly what is needed, what was promised, is cost effective, and is incredibly easy to use and manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    Not my decision, but I have made it very clear this product does not perform. I have emails from our users on how bad it is after switching to it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    OpenText
    It is much simpler to configure and operate in comparison to other anti-spam applications. Zix's customer usage is comparable to that of other spam filters on the market; but, in terms of convenience of use, Zix comes out on top. Daily delivery of logs is provided, and the user is not required to sign in order for an email to be sent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    The interface is simple to use but still contains the information needed to conduct thorough investigations. If you own licenses for other Proofpoint tools, Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is easily accessible from those applications. The ability to sandbox URLs within the TAP interface is a great feature as well. The overall performance of the GUI is seamless, especially if enabled with your organization's SSO.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    AppRiver's support from our perspective replaces the Microsoft365 Support we typically would have to receive from Microsoft by ticket. Instead, AppRiver supports us by phone, live chat, or email. Being able to get a hold of someone quickly makes a huge difference, especially when an issue is urgent and we can't wait hours or days for a response from Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    Generally have had good response and resolution time with knowledgeable technicians, and if needed the ticket is moved to someone with more expertise to better address the issue. Have used the ticketing portal, phone, as well as the beta chat feature (permanent please!)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Proofpoint
    Proofpoint managed the installation and made it very simple. We had a dedicated installation engineer who checked in on use periodically after go-live to ensure that there were no issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    Cost is competitive, but factoring in Office licensing really made sense for my organization. Cost is lower for more features - I was able to move to Zix and get the top of the line package, moving from a mid-tier product at a competitor. Workflows and process have improved, and the filter is more accurate than our previous filter
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    This is the first product of its kind that I've used personally. The last 3 companies that I worked for also used Proofpoint, which includes Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection, so I don't have a way to really compare it. I have seen that it is a leader in the industry.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Protecting patient information
    • Users have to complete an account setup in order to view the encrypted email in a portal. Other platforms just let you open the email without having to setup an account.
    • Pretty easy to use if you don't make many customizations to it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proofpoint
    • Saves IT time when an attack is successful and isn't reported in a timely manner or at all until damages are done. IT has to spend less time and effort because we are able to stop it before it spreads.
    • Protecting business resources and assets is a huge positive impact. TAP allows us to better protect our business and information within.
    • The only negative thing is that it doesn't automatically handle these attacks - but that is what TRAP is for! I wish Proofpoint bundled TAP and TRAP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots