OpenText Core Email Threat Protection vs. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText Core Email Threat Protection | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText Core Email Threat Protection defends inbound, outbound, and internal email from phishing, ransomware, and email compromise. The solution combines capabilities of the former Webroot Email Security Powered by Zix (formerly Zix Email Threat Protection) and AppRiver. | N/A |
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps organizations efficiently detect, mitigate and respond to known and unknown advanced threats that target people and VIPs through email. TAP provides unparalleled effectiveness in stopping targeted attacks that use polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and credential-stealing phishing techniques to obtain sensitive information. TAP seamlessly integrates with the Proofpoint secure email gateway (Proofpoint Email Protection) to deliver best… | N/A |
| OpenText Core Email Threat Protection | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenText Core Email Threat Protection | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
69% Would buy again 9 Answers | 88% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
85% Delivers good value for the price 11 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
77% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | 83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| OpenText Core Email Threat Protection | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secure Email Gateway |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OpenText Core Email Threat Protection | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Sophos Email Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Sophos Email Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | ![]() Microsoft Exchange Score8.6 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| OpenText Core Email Threat Protection | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 6.4 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 5.3 |
| Usability | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.9 |
| OpenText Core Email Threat Protection | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |





