Oracle CPQ vs. Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle CPQ
Score 4.6 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
The Salesforce Platform is designed for building and deploying scalable cloud applications with managed hardware provisioning and app stacks. Lightning Web Components are used by developers to build reusable UI components.
$25
Per User Per Month
Pricing
Oracle CPQSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Editions & Modules
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Starter
$25.00
Per User Per Month
Plus
$100.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CPQSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle CPQSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Features
Oracle CPQSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CPQ
6.7
18 Ratings
27% below category average
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Product configuration8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration options8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Pricing rules7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Price adjustment5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Order capturing7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
7.2
30 Ratings
8% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.030 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.028 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.027 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings6.023 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.026 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings6.025 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.028 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle CPQSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle CPQSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(45 ratings)
8.8
(36 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(26 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(8 ratings)
8.2
(9 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(4 ratings)
8.1
(15 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
2.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle CPQSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
Read full review
Salesforce
If you have a large customer base and a large amount of data on each of your customers, it is really strong in creating personalized content that your salespeople can use in their pitch meetings—and then setting up workflows for automated for lifecycle journey creations to automatically go out to customers.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
  • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
  • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It has a very smooth integration with Salesforce and third-party tools, ensuring easy tracking of policies and assets.
  • It also has impressive security features like used-based permissions and encrypted data.
  • Everything can be managed from a centralized place which saves a lot of time.
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
  • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
  • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It takes a while before it recognizes bounced emails.
  • We get so many notifications from a single action. Not sure if this can be modified in the settings though.
  • Error messages are sometimes unclear which makes it hard for us to identify the problem.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Oracle
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
Read full review
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Usability
Oracle
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
Read full review
Salesforce
It's very good, but it's still living in a little bit in an older design aspect, but I think a lot of it is about to come out, just hasn't quite gotten there yet. Still a little clunky from a you have to know it to know it or you know it to use it. It takes a little bit of training to get into it. It's not quite the, anybody can come in and start using it immediately, type feel.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Oracle
Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
Read full review
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Performance
Oracle
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Read full review
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Oracle
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
Read full review
Salesforce
I am not an administrator so there may very well be outstanding Support and I am just not privy to it. On a user level it's hard to gauge the effectiveness and responsiveness of Support because nearly everything has to go through an administrator
Read full review
In-Person Training
Oracle
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
Read full review
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Oracle
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.

Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.

EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.

The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.

Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Read full review
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
Read full review
Salesforce
We were previously using an older version prior to it becoming Salesforce Lightning Platform so we were well adverse on the advantages of using a CRM, to begin with. It made sense to convert to Salesforce Lightning Platform after we were given a free trial of the platform. Certain reps were chosen to experiment with it and from there a decision was made to move forward. We've been customers ever since.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
  • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
  • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Better visibility of Accounts and Contacts interactions makes it easier to maintain during employee transitions.
  • Tracking of current jobs and relating them to past jobs is very useful.
  • More efficient use of Sales Reps time.
  • Sales Managers have good visibility into how their people are working.
Read full review
ScreenShots