TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle CPQ

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.

    $240

    per month per user

    SAP Sales Performance Management

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AFor salespeople, tools to accelerate business outcomes with sales planning, automated sales management processes, incentive compensation management, and the ability to analyze sales performance at scale.

    $744

    per year

    Pricing
    Oracle CPQSAP Sales Performance Management
    Editions & Modules
    CPQ Pricing
    $240.00
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle CPQSAP Sales Performance Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Oracle CPQSAP Sales Performance Management
    Considered Both Products
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    55 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    43 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    56 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    33 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    82%
    Implementation went as expected
    41 Answers
    Features
    Oracle CPQSAP Sales Performance Management
    CPQ
    Comparison of CPQ features of Oracle CPQ and SAP Sales Performance Management
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    6.7
    18 Ratings
    26% below category average
    SAP Sales Performance Management
    -
    Ratings
    Quote sharing/sending7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product configuration8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration options8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pricing rules7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Price adjustment5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Purchase history and open contracts6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Guided selling/Sales portal7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ reporting & analytics7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ-CRM integration7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Attachments to quotes5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order capturing7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Oracle CPQ and SAP Sales Performance Management
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    SAP Sales Performance Management
    7.9
    41 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings7.537 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings8.121 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings7.927 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.524 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
    Revenue Forecasting00 Ratings7.520 Ratings
    Pipeline Analytics00 Ratings7.633 Ratings
    Sales ICM
    Comparison of Sales ICM features of Oracle CPQ and SAP Sales Performance Management
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    SAP Sales Performance Management
    8.1
    50 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Sales compensation plan creation00 Ratings8.846 Ratings
    Complex sales crediting00 Ratings8.444 Ratings
    Sales compensation process automation00 Ratings8.447 Ratings
    Incentive auditing/regulation compliance00 Ratings8.043 Ratings
    Sales compensation dashboards & forecasting00 Ratings7.342 Ratings
    Incentive modeling00 Ratings7.629 Ratings
    Agile incentive strategy00 Ratings7.933 Ratings
    ICM mobile visibility00 Ratings8.028 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle CPQSAP Sales Performance Management
    Small Businesses
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Xactly
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Agentforce Revenue Management
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Xactly
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle CPQSAP Sales Performance Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (45 ratings)
    8.5
    (58 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (26 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    3.0
    (8 ratings)
    8.3
    (54 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    2.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (40 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle CPQSAP Sales Performance Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    SAP Sales Performance Management from Success Factors works great if the incentive calculation is simple. However, if it contains a lot of constraints and filters or is dynamic, it is not friendly to changes or complexity in terms of configuration and time to calculate the incentives. The advantages of using SAP Sales Performance Management are that the process is controlled, the data is in the cloud, and the roles and permissions make it more secure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
    • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
    • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Configurable out of the box.
    • Allows for complex compensation rules (Rate tables, MDLTs, etc).
    • Has the ability to build cross-channel (non-hierarchy) relationships. For us, this is very powerful.
    • Can build a large data warehouse of commissionable data.
    • Speed to market can be as fast as minutes.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
    • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
    • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Using names to reference payees in the compensation platform, instead of their ID
    • Allow an Advisor to see their compensation as well as how their employees compensation without requiring to proxy
    • Expose all variables within the application to the dashboard, to allow them to be used for data insights, without requiring any extra work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    I would use this product if it were needed due to very complex plans/organization
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    My rate is 9 because there is always a way to improve a system. In this case the usability is high but there are some thing that could be improve like usability of report and the payment detail page and also clud be more and more useful is in lookuptable there are some orders or a research tab
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Oracle
    Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Oracle
    It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Oracle
    They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Oracle
    It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.

    Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.

    EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.

    The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.

    Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
    Read full review
    SAP
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
    Read full review
    SAP
    Faster implementation, more user-friendly interface, and lower reliance on IT made Sales Performance Management solutions from SAP SuccessFactors an easy choice over Xactly. SAP's allowance for complex modeling helped us choose it over Varicent. The faster development and high intuitive nature of Sales Performance Management solutions from SAP SuccessFactors also made it a better platform than previous usage of Performio.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
    • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
    • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
    Read full review
    SAP
    • The efficiencies gained by moving from reports and spreadsheet alone has earned us a positive ROI.
    • SAP Commissions speed to the market allows us to quickly and cheaply change our direction to meet market demands.
    • Our sales force's engagement has drastically improved. We are now paying monthly instead of quarterly and have earned their trust.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    SAP Sales Performance Management Screenshots

    Screenshot of a dashboard in SAP SuccessFactors Incentive Management, used to motivate sales teams to maximize performance.Screenshot of SAP SuccessFactors Territory and Quota, a solution to improve quota management and territory planning.Screenshot of SAP SuccessFactors Agent Performance Management, used to empower agents for productive field selling.Screenshot of SAP SuccessFactors Agent Lifecycle Management, a solution to optimize sales agent lifecycle management and experiences.