The basis of this offering is the Market2Lead product that Oracle acquired in 2010. It has now been fully integrated with Oracle's On Demand CRM product and is a full-featured marketing automation product with features from lead management and nurturing, to measuring marketing ROI.
N/A
TempWorks Software
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
With a mobile ATS and CRM browser-based solution, TempWorks offers recruiters and sales teams tools to stay ahead. With a fully open API for integration development, a customizable user interface design, accessibility on any device, and weekly automatic updates of new features, TempWorks Beyond aims to deliver all the elements for your staffing agency's success.
N/A
TrackerRMS
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
TrackerRMS is a cloud based CRM and recruitment software provider designed for companies and users from startups to enterprise level customers. Some key features include: Contact & Activity Management, Sales Lead & Opportunity Management, and Standard Reports & Dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
Oracle CRM On Demand
TempWorks Software
TrackerRMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CRM On Demand
TempWorks Software
TrackerRMS
Free Trial
No
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle CRM On Demand
TempWorks Software
TrackerRMS
Considered Multiple Products
Oracle CRM On Demand
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Oracle CRM On Demand
I have used Maximo before and as I can say I feel more free with oracle and comfortable to use.
It is right in line with Insightly. Salesforce has more integrations and it is easy to call in for help solutions. This is more self taught and working to build your own system that is best for your company's needs. Very good CRM for the price. Easy to follow instructions and …
MS Dynamics was easy to integrate to MS Power BI. This BI and reporting aspect is a clear strong point for Microsoft. MS solutions seem easier to integrate and learn, but this depends on the IT landscape and the complexity of integrations in a respective company.
Oracle CRM is much more robust with more functionality. The UI is visually appealing and it is more user friendly. Siebel is more budget friendly and more of a bare bones CRM.
Oracle CRM is popular and integrates well with other Oracle family software hence improving its usage and productivity in your company. The software is also easy to deploy, install and use in your company and further fits in all organizations whether small or big. It's also one …
Oracle CRM comes in various subscription plans that are lowly priced and one chooses their preferred plan based on the cost incurred and the size of your company. On top of that, Oracle CRM offers a free trial to new customers where they can acquire the software and use to …
Oracle on demand is customizable and I can configure to meet the complex of customers unique needs. Compared to other software similar to Oracle On Demand it is seamless and very stable with regular maintenance.
Salesforce does not have the same level of user friendliness or organization that Oracle CRM does. Oracle CRM has much more flexibility and allows for more freedom in reporting and displaying sales data.
We went with Oracle CRM since we had already bought into the Oracle ERP suite. It stacks up well against most alternative software solutions in its similar category.
It is easily integrated. Because of this we are able to adapt to this program quickly since it is connected to our other CRM. Ultimately, it is about having a proper way to track our customers to service all of their needs. This creates an organized approach and can be custom …
Oracle app is more available on different mobile devices, Microsoft Dynamics has only Windows and Android but Oracle has both web-based, Mac, IOS. Social CRM feature is another one that Microsoft Dynamics doesn't provide. On the other hand, Microsoft Dynamics provides offline …
The way in which I utilize TW now is a bit antiquated compared to the online portals that I used with Bullhorn and Crelate. I think the simplicity of the funtionality of TW is much easier to navigate than Bullhorn and Crelate, however I think it really depends on your …
We use Avionte and it is significantly better in almost all aspects and we have great customer service. I have access to the CEO if there are any serious issues that are not resolved.
Onbording on TrackerRMS is smooth as compare to bullhorn. Screening and assesment is also very good. Dashboard is user friendly and easy to use. scheduling is very easy
I think it is well suited for organizations which are large with a lot of users so as to be able to minimize the cost of operations. Also, the organization which interacts mostly with customers can use Oracle CRM on demand.
The way I explain TempWorks to people who ask me about my experience is that it is a company in decline. When I started with TempWorks years ago, the service was great. Over the past several years [I feel] it has completely declined. I would not recommend TempWorks to anyone.
Application customization is a key strength. We can create custom home page experiences for each type of user, customize object layouts to change dynamically depending on object type, and create an embedded sales process unique to our organization that helps facilitate the user through the process by specifying required fields dependent on what stage of the process they are in. The ability to customize goes directly to the success of user adoption - the fact that we can customize layouts and processes to support our internal business processes helps users make the most of the system.
Robust Reporting. The reporting and data warehouse capabilities are excellent. We have thousands of custom reports delivered in a number of ways - on home pages, on dashboards, on demand through the reporting menu, and on custom web tabs. These reports range from simple lists to complex multi-object analyses.
Ability to get data in and get data out. CRMOD makes it very easy to import data into any object. This is helpful for importing lists or making mass changes. Exporting data is equally easy, both from an administrator standpoint and for the user. Users can display a list or do a custom advanced search and then easily export the data to Excel without any admin help. They can also export from any report, which is helpful when sales data needs to be combined with other financial data in a larger analysis.
The system's workflow capabilities allow us to improve field validation, send important notifications, and enforce business process requirements.
A scripting mechanism is needed to customize the data entry forms. As any data driven system, Oracle CRM on demand is as reliable as its data is. Having sales people entering and maintaining the data you have to make sure they are doing that and not cutting corners. One way to do that is to enforce the business requirements in the entry forms.
User interface / user experience definitely can and should be improved.
It needs a way to send automatic reports on a schedule via email.
Support: as usual the Oracle support tends to be tedious and lengthy.
Compared to other competitors I find it very easy to use and learn .It has been helpful in our organisation and we have been able to manage our projects and operations well without interference.
MS Dynamics was easy to integrate to MS Power BI. This BI and reporting aspect is a clear strong point for Microsoft. MS solutions seem easier to integrate and learn, but this depends on the IT landscape and the complexity of integrations in a respective company.
The way in which I utilize TW now is a bit antiquated compared to the online portals that I used with Bullhorn and Crelate. I think the simplicity of the funtionality of TW is much easier to navigate than Bullhorn and Crelate, however I think it really depends on your permissions of use, flexibility in customization, etc. I feel as though Bullhorn did a great job of search functionality, as it was easier to search for candidates on the online platform with a search bar up top that you could literally type anything into and the candidate would automatically populate under the search bar. Ex. If I were looking up a candidate by their phone number, I would start typing it in any format (3176541277 or 317-654-1277 or (317) 654-1277) and no matter what the corresponding candidate would pop up as I typed. Same with email, first or last name, etc.
Onbording on TrackerRMS is smooth as compare to bullhorn. Screening and assesment is also very good. Dashboard is user friendly and easy to use. scheduling is very easy
Much easier for us to track sales leads as we have had almost universal adoption and continued user interaction with the program as opposed to our previous tool, Salesforce. CRM has likely cut back on many hours of calls and check-ups with its easy to use system.
Customer feedback has been much improved as we are able to track any areas that need additional focus and address them immediately.