Oracle's PeopleSoft HCM is a complete, customizable suite including Global Core Human Capital Management, Workforce Management, Workforce Service Delivery, and Talent Management. PeopleSoft can be integrated to run on the Oracle Cloud.
$85
Per User Per Month
Workday Adaptive Planning
Score 7.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Workday Adaptive Planning(formerly Adaptive Insights) is a financial planning and reporting tool. It includes automated budgeting and forecasting, financial reporting, and other active planning capabilities, including integrations with third-party products like Salesforce.
N/A
Pricing
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
Workday Adaptive Planning
Editions & Modules
Benefits
$85.00
Per User Per Month
Pension Administration
$85.00
Per User Per Month
Human Resources
$185.00
Per User Per Month
Payroll
$225.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
Workday Adaptive Planning
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
Workday Adaptive Planning
Features
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
Workday Adaptive Planning
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.4
74 Ratings
7% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
7.570 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
7.068 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
6.870 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.068 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
7.360 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.065 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
8.057 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.2
64 Ratings
11% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.160 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
6.444 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.155 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.758 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
7.756 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.743 Ratings
00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
6.8
52 Ratings
18% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Approval workflow
6.744 Ratings
00 Ratings
Balance details
7.051 Ratings
00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
6.740 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.4
73 Ratings
9% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information
8.063 Ratings
00 Ratings
Update personal information
8.871 Ratings
00 Ratings
View company policy documentation
6.749 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee recognition
5.442 Ratings
00 Ratings
View job history
8.367 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
9.0
29 Ratings
13% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
9.029 Ratings
00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
6.9
69 Ratings
9% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Report builder
8.066 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-built reports
7.363 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
5.458 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
8.3
48 Ratings
4% above category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
New hire portal
8.048 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
8.544 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
5.9
37 Ratings
31% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
6.135 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
6.637 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
5.135 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
5.637 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
5.3
42 Ratings
40% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Performance plans
5.641 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
5.140 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
5.140 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
5.135 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
5.638 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
6.2
33 Ratings
22% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
6.632 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
6.131 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
6.032 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
6.129 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
6.2
38 Ratings
22% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
5.436 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
6.034 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
5.131 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
5.135 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
6.728 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
7.437 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.436 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.3
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is great for onboarding new hires. The process, including some newer direct entry features, has been streamlined and made more intuitive. However, there is a steep learning curve for those who are completely unfamiliar with enterprise systems as a whole. In my experience, Oracle PeopleSoft HCM's updates have historically failed to improve the intuitiveness of navigation and features even through a move to a SaaS configuration in the cloud. This makes it hard to train new HR staff because there may be five different ways to accomplish the same thing and none of them are intuitive enough to just "figure out". This has been a bone of contention for me for all Oracle products for my entire 20+ year career, and it has never been fully addressed.
In a previous company, I was hired based on my experience with Workday Adaptive Planning. After being hired and reviewing the company, I quickly determined they were not large of enough of a company to need the program. Instead, we made better Excel budget templates, utilized OneDrive and created a better experience without the cost. Left the job after 9 months because I worked my way out of the position. My next role I looked for bigger companies and had better success with implementation.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is one of the best product and has helped implement the complex Business functionalities in the Higher Education business in a very streamlined process.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM helped in moving from 34 different legacy system to one centralized system which helps immensely in maintaining the data and reporting purpose.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM also helps immensely in data analytics and trend analysis which helps immensely in preparing for the resourcing and planning for the peak season in advance and be better prepared to handle the quarterly on annual activities.
It helps create dynamic plans for finances, operations and various functional units in an organization all under one platform
It helps in scenario modeling to help analyze various business events and report by any number of business dimensions including channel, customer or product
It can be integrated with any system including ERP, BI or CRM
We have issues with students using Time & Labor for multiple jobs, where time is incorrectly calculated, including negative balances where none exist.
The application is complex and some areas, especially Time & Labor, are very difficult to troubleshoot. The overall level of complexity has increased over the years.
We also use Campus Solutions and had to split apart HCM and CS, significantly increasing our maintenance overhead and creating inter-system issues that aren't always resolvable.
Campus Solutions has developed a solution for managing preferred names and gender identity that is missing/ incompatible with the HCM product.
Web reports and sheets are not great for in-depth reporting, and require the use of the OfficeConnect for Excel plugin and, therefore, the use of Excel for extensive reporting capabilities.
It has limited formula functionality in some instances, requiring again the use of OfficeConnect for Excel for extensive calculations.
I would like to see new planning sheet types or upgrades to existing sheet types; functionality has been the same for over 10 years.
PeopleSoft HCM has provided a very flexible platform for our HR needs. The ability to add customizations to handle some of our unique business processes have been critical in the longevity of our PS HCM use. We've been able to handle a wide variety of business processes for multiple subsidiaries due to the ability to customize when needed.
For one we're in way too deep to not move forward with Adaptive. We're integrated with Workday, we do a ton of reporting with Adaptive, and it's working very well for planning and forecasting. No reason to look back or change course.
Oracle HCM has been around for more thab a decade and is a preferred package to use for Human capital management.Ease with which upgrades happen and how updates are pushed has come thru a long way of improvement and research over the years.Oracle has moved toward cloud based architecture which will help in its customers keep at par with current industry trends.
Workday Adaptive Planning has detailed online help with both articles and videos that are comprehensive. It has a lot of similarities to Excel, which most finance people are already familiar with, plus the user interface is intuitive and easy to pick up. The online support team is quick to respond and very knowledgeable.
I give this rating because we have had no issues in the area of the product's overall availability. In my opinion the resources are there when we need them and the features serve the purpose they are set to do. I feel things have gone really well as far as the availability of the product.
There haven't been any lately. The only one issue I can think of is when there was an update in Adaptive that altered our reports. Before I realized there was an issue, Adaptive reached out to let me know, so that it could be fixed.
This is highly dependent on the server setup you implement. You need to make sure you've included enough hardware to support your users. Not enough power will quickly rear its ugly head. If you've got the correct setup, the product will operate quickly and provide a good user experience. Oracle is slowed down by certain realtime interfaces to other systems, but this can be addressed by your technical team relatively easily.
All aspects of Adaptive Insights perform well. One area that I wish was quicker was integration. When importing data from Intacct our accounting ERP platform, it can sometimes take 4 hours for the import to process. The earlier imports are done, the quicker they complete. My estimate for a quick upload is about two hours.
Overall support has been positive and Oracle has gladly sent out representatives to meet with our teams in person. Despite sometimes sow and inadequate fixes, their willingness to try and meet face to face helps give them a better name in our organization. Sometimes their people do not understand unique needs of the industry, and it can be a challenge to explain that one size does not fit all. Finding the appropriate IT support for our unique requests has been hit and miss.
Whenever we have had any questions, issues, or concerns, the support has been quick and thorough. [This] allow[s] us to be able to fully resolve any issues, or be connected with the right group quickly to attain the result we were after; be it from simple formatting to adding new detailed reporting.
In my opinion, training in Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is arduous at best. In my experience, there are numerous issues with creating training environments and that makes practice in a sandbox costly. I prefer asynchronous simulated environment training for this reason, but that costs even more due to the development and testing time needed to create that training. eLearning is always there with only the need to keep it up-to-date.
This was extremely helpful so that they could walk you through the model and teach you more about the complexity of various areas. It is most helpful when it is specific to your organization's model. The larger in-person trainings were helpful but they tended to be more generic and entry level. The trainings that are more tailored to your specific needs are the most helpful.
It was a great training tool and provided all of the necessary information we needed to implement the sites for our clients. We were provided with a great deal of resources in regards to Oracle CRM. We didn't have any issues with the training at all. The only thing I would say would that there could be more FAQ's for users to read through
They often times tended to be way too generic or entry level. They would also become sales pitches to upgrade or get new Adaptive Planning products. The questions in the training would be very niche and specific to other organizations. They were rarely helpful to the group at large.
When we implement Oracle and Taleo to different clients it typically goes pretty smoothly. When we do system upgrades we usually test the main issues the clients are having just to make sure there are not outstanding issues or errors. I don't have any examples where implementation went poorly. It typically goes well and clients are pleased with the final result. The only complaint would be the time it takes to implement
Trust the expertise of very strong 3rd party implementers. Having deployed Adaptive at a separate company before, I thought I knew it all (hubris, I know). Fortunately, I began to (very quickly) trust the judgment of our Carlson implementation team, and they provided invaluable insights and best-in-class processes that have benefitted me and my team greatly.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is not as good as SuccessFactors HCM. The look and feel of Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is still 'old school'. Cloud solutions can do more. SuccessFactors offers a great talent management, performance measurement, and employee development, while Oracle PeopleSoft HCM's core is employee records, benefits, and payroll.
Workday became our choice because it is fully web-based and easily integrates with other systems. The learning curve for Workday was shorter than that of Dynamics. The reporting tools in Workday are more user-friendly than that of Dynamics. However Workday did not have Check Printing tools which are available in Dynamics. The organization started a project to digitize all financial transactions so it was not a priority feature. When it comes to scaling up the functionalities of Workday it was much easier than Dynamics.
In my opinion I rate this high because we have had no issues in this area and so that is why I give it such a high rating. There is no issue with the product's overall scalability. In my opinion this has been a positive from my team and client's view.
We went from 2 users to 70+ users over a 2 year period of time. The application scaled wonderfully. 65 of those users were non-finance users so they were able to quickly learn the software and prepare budgets quickly and efficiently. That is the power of Adaptive and its ability to scale
As a long time PeopleSoft user, my institution has found great advantages of being involved in the HCM realm such as first-hand information, a complete suite of solutions as well as regular updates to stay up with federal and state regulations.
Ease of use of development, customization, maintenance and usage perspectives can lead to a better management of financial resources, that minimizes expenditure while providing all necessary resources.
Opportunities to provide better customer service and meet organizational policies have to lead to a positive outlook on the tool and its features.
It's facilitated a better financial literacy and management by the non-financial managers in the company, giving them a much better ability to see what they're spending, control it, and plan better in the future.
It's hard to quantify the ease of model and version management, but we could never do what we're doing now with our current staff. It would take a small army to replicate anything close to what Adaptive pulls off using Excel, if it's even possible.