TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ProcessMaker

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.N/A

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ATagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
    Pricing
    ProcessMakerWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ProcessMakerWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ProcessMakerWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Considered Both Products
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answer on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    60%
    Would buy again
    3 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    60%
    Happy with the feature set
    3 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    18 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Features
    ProcessMakerWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    8.6
    11 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.811 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports8.811 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process Engine
    Comparison of Process Engine features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    8.8
    10 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Process designer9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process simulation8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business rules engine9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    SOA support9.910 Ratings00 Ratings
    Process player7.98 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form builder7.88 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model execution8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business Process Automation
    Comparison of Business Process Automation features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    8.0
    3 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Business Process Modeling8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Decision Modeling8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code-Based Automation8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    No-Code Automation7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.1
    10 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.58 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    7.4
    24 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings6.623 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.123 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.17 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.716 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.4
    15 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.913 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings7.712 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings9.911 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.5
    8 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.8
    23 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings9.922 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.216 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    6.1
    9 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings5.08 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.16 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.4
    49 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings8.235 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.143 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings8.240 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings8.634 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings9.046 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.8
    46 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Financial data consolidation00 Ratings8.940 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports00 Ratings8.337 Ratings
    Multi-currency management00 Ratings8.334 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings9.337 Ratings
    Minority Ownership00 Ratings8.630 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.236 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.0
    50 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.042 Ratings
    Management Reporting00 Ratings8.947 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings8.150 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings9.035 Ratings
    XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings9.920 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.2
    31 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings8.426 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings8.624 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings8.322 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of ProcessMaker and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    ProcessMaker
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.2
    47 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Flat file integration00 Ratings9.339 Ratings
    Excel data integration00 Ratings9.145 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings9.131 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ProcessMakerWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Small Businesses
    Bizagi
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
    Score9 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ProcessMakerWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (11 ratings)
    9.0
    (50 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    6.6
    (5 ratings)
    8.7
    (18 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (6 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.6
    (5 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ProcessMakerWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
    Read full review
    Pros
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
    • The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
    • Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
    • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
    • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
    • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
    • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
    • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
    • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    We are happy with this product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
    Read full review
    Usability
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
    Read full review
    Online Training
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ProcessMaker Inc.
    • I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
    • But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
    • However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
    • A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
    • Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

    Screenshot of Homepage