TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull vs. Splunk On-Call

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AProofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull (TRAP) enables messaging and security administrators to automatically retract threats delivered to employee inboxes and emails that turn malicious after delivery to quarantine. It is also a powerful solution to retract messages sent in error as well as inappropriate, malicious, or emails containing compliance violations and also follows forwarded mail and distribution lists and creates an audit-able activity trail. With Proofpoint Threat Response…N/A

    Splunk On-Call

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AFormerly known as VictorOps, Splunk On-Call is an incident response system for developers, devops and operations teams that helps reduce outage time.N/A
    Pricing
    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-PullSplunk On-Call
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-PullSplunk On-Call
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-PullSplunk On-Call
    Considered Both Products
    Proofpoint
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    89%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    Features
    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-PullSplunk On-Call
    Incident Response Platforms
    Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull and Splunk On-Call
    Feature
    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-Pull
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Splunk On-Call
    -
    Ratings
    Integration with Other Security Systems9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Attack Chain Visualization8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Dashboard6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Machine Learning to Prevent Incidents9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Live Response for Rapid Remediation10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-PullSplunk On-Call
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    6.0
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Proofpoint Threat Response Auto-PullSplunk On-Call
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Proofpoint
    If your email admins spend time manually pulling malicious emails, this tool will save them countless hours of work and will do it for them 24 x 7. So if a user receives a malicious email after-hours, TRAP will auto pull it from the affected user's mailbox and potentially save you from an IT disaster.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    I recommend Splunk on-call is more suited where there are high incident queues; multiple teams need to be involved in handling a P1 severity issue. Multiple levels of escalation are needed environment where automated action is required. I recommend the solution for large-scale & medium-scale business units. For small-scale business units, I see the functional value is less.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Proofpoint
    • Auto pull works great, even with our hybrid situation with 2 on premise exchange organizations.
    • Reporting is good, nice graphs of all the actions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Easily assign work/tickets between multiple users
    • Supports a wide variety of software integrations
    • Easy to manage scheduling tool
    • As part of the Splunk toolset, provides detailed levels of data analysis at our engineers fingertips
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Proofpoint
    • Learning curve is steep.
    • Interface can be clunky.
    • Some interface items seem counter-intuitive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • The user interface can be furthe improved
    • Licensing needs to be simplified and packaged as a bundle with other Splunk product like Enterprise Security
    • Customer outreach can be further enhanced
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Proofpoint
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It was a good solution with a good comprimise prize/features for our use cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Proofpoint
    It's easy to use and requires very little administrator hands on.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Not a lot of love given to VO since the acquisition by Splunk from my POV
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Proofpoint
    They are quick to respond and have talented support personnel.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    VictorOps support has proven excellent for us. Because it is such a widely used tool, there is a lot of documentation on usage, and a large community of users to lean on. Also, many engineers have had experience working with VictorOps already, and the tool is so easy to setup / manage that much support isn't really necessary.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Proofpoint
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    It was a good solution with a good comprimise prize/features for our use cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Proofpoint
    I have never evaluated TRAP against another product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Splunk On-Call integrates better with our Splunk Cybersecurity and Reporting products due to the same family tree of the same eco system. We were previously using built-in on-call from individual applications and while adequate, they were difficult to manage and support SLA varied greatly across different applications. In addition we also used xMatters which did not integrate well with SAP products nor Citrix products so we were still using more than a single on-call product which was solved by implementing Splunk On-Call
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Proofpoint
    • Chances of phishing attacks has decreased.
    • Your employees don't have to do anything, so no impact on productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • It runs our on call rotation so it makes it easy for us.
    • It integrates with Slack so it makes it easy for us to manage through Slack.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots