Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience vs. TeamDesk

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The Salesforce Platform is designed for building and deploying scalable cloud applications with managed hardware provisioning and app stacks. Lightning Web Components are used by developers to build reusable UI components.
$25
Per User Per Month
TeamDesk
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
TeamDesk is a low-code development platform for online database creation. Business owners or managers can build a unique web database solution without any programming to facilitate working with data, organize routine work and create an accessible data source for teams.
$49
5 users included
Pricing
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceTeamDesk
Editions & Modules
Starter
$25.00
Per User Per Month
Plus
$100.00
Per User Per Month
Starter Edition
$49
5 users included
Team Edition
$99
10 users included
Enterprise Edition
$249
10 users included, Unlimited databases, Sub-domain
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceTeamDesk
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceTeamDesk
Considered Both Products
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I've used SharePoint a lot. We've used a handful of other bespoke previous, like jula based clients for talking to customers, Jula based platform, some other open source ones, but most of the companies I work for already have a footprint in Salesforce, so it's usually the, …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Adept Agent Stack
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
This fits into the mold with the other Salesforce services. Once you get used to the suite and the nuances of each platform, things become easy. Just read any documentation first, as jumping in will only get you so far, and the more connections with the other apps, the more …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We have only used Salesforce CMS in our organizations as we already use Salesforce CRM for sales, marketing and other purposes
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Hubspot CSM is a bit easier to use, but not as strong for bigger markets like enterprise. Also, it's a bit annoying having to log into different platforms. Being able to do everything directly in Salesforce is pretty nice.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
This is really the first time we had a platform such as SF, so we have nothing to which to compare it.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We have always been a Salesforce shop, but have grown with the App Cloud platform as it's evolved. We eventually moved to lightning based on the streamlined interface and increased ease of use for our employees. So far we are happy with the results. Would definitely recommend …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Salesforce, while more expensive, provides faster support, higher scalability options, and an increased opportunity to change any details whether it's about user permissions management, custom field or object creation, or an integration of another application. What really sets …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We were previously using an older version prior to it becoming Salesforce Lightning Platform so we were well adverse on the advantages of using a CRM, to begin with. It made sense to convert to Salesforce Lightning Platform after we were given a free trial of the platform. …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I think Salesforce has the most powerful developer engine - I have yet to need a module that I couldn't create (maybe with help). I probably could have made the others work but Salesforce, in my opinion, made it the easiest. Salesforce is reliable and established as well so …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I would love to switch back to Service Cloud as it was much, much more intuitive and fast. I would even take Salesforce Classic over Lightning. It at least wasn't this slow.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I used a program formerly known as "CP." I considered it somewhat outdated, and it does not have any of the modern features that the Salesforce Lightning Platform (formerly Salesforce App Cloud) has. I consider the Salesforce Lightning Platform (formerly Salesforce App Cloud) …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I use both. SF is the constant through the organization and I receive leads into SF and pass on opportunities through SF.
SL is better for internal processes within business dev.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Salesforce is the premeire product. Period. The others are cheaper and less capable, they may fulfill your organisation's needs but you will always be looking at Salesforce with wishful eyes. If you are a company that needs to bootstrap then spend the time to evaluate your …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Microsoft is pretty limited in functionality compared to Salesforce. Most folks coming into your organization are going to have some level of Salesforce experience but will most likely not have experience with Dynamics. Dynamics doesn't connect as well to other platforms.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I believe the only reason we didn't choose Monday.com is because we're just a bit bigger (company size- 75 people) than what Monday.com handles. We also are in San Francisco, and Salesforce pretty much owns this entire city. I was also not part of the selection process of the …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
There is a reason why the Salesforce Lightning Platform is the market leader for all things related to customer relationship management. While Close is somewhat user-friendly, it pales in comparison to all the features, bells, and whistles that the Salesforce Lightning Platform …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We originally used spreadsheets when we first started. That worked fine until we started growing by over 100% year over year. We were able to upload all of our previous accounts in Salesforce Classic once it was called for. However, Salesforce Classic soon became redundant and …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We needed a product that would allow for easy and dynamic reports for potential and new clients. Account Managers use other products as well to monitor the client's success and Salesforce allows for seamless integration to other platforms. This serves as a one-stop-shop for all …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We currently use the two together, along with Hubspot sales. Salesforce is our primary CRM and where we track and manage account and contact information.
Salesforce is much more flexible and intuitive - everything is where you would expect it to be.
Hubspot reporting is …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
I think that the Lightning platform is not as clean and doesn't integrate that well. Whenever I was logged out, it was such a treck to have to log back in and I never actually knew if my activity was being saved or actually being tracked. Personally, Lightning is not my …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Close and Salesforce are two very different beasts. Close is much more user friendly but lacks the ability to serve complex infrastructures and hierarchies provided by Salesforce. Close is much simpler and faster--great for high volume but will not provide you with rich, …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Salesforce App Cloud provides a very easy way for you to install apps as well as deploy your own apps. You are, however, limited to the Salesforce marketplace and the requirements that they have for apps to be published in their marketplace. Even so, it's still fairly easy to …
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
This is the only tool in this field we have any involvement/experience with.
Chose Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
We haven't used anything exactly like Salesforce App Cloud, but in the end we decided to use our own development environment/process and deploy via Heroku. Therefore, I can't speak to how App Cloud compares to other more integrated solutions, but for our needs it was easier to …
TeamDesk
Chose TeamDesk
Quickbase is a good product which I have been using for 5 years (powerful, nice interface) but - not so powerful as TeamDesk - started to move toward large companies (>50 people) - more expensive than TeamDesk Zoho was not as flexible as TeamDesk Caspio was not as powerful as …
Chose TeamDesk
Prior to Teamdesk we used Excel, an Access database, an online time and expense tracking system, and Dabble DB. Excel and Access had limitations with simultaneous access on the LAN, the online T&E system did only that and was not flexible, and Dabble was flexible, but how can …
Chose TeamDesk
We have evaluated many other low-code offerings and none offer the all-around package that is provided by TeamDesk. They are a privately run and funded company and have been in existence for over 15 years. Many other companies in this industry have either been bought out and …
Chose TeamDesk
TeamDesk provides much better price, unlimited storage space, and more flexibility.
Chose TeamDesk
Salesforce: Only has some of the features TeamDesk has.
Pipedrive: Seems like a beta version of Teamdesk and also doesn't offer as much as Teamdesk.
Goldmine: Goldmines program is basically just a very small feature that Teamdesk has among many others.
Chose TeamDesk
I have not used other products to the same extent as TeamDesk. All I can say is that TeamDesk is far less expensive than competitors and has tremendous functionality.
Features
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceTeamDesk
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
7.2
Ratings
7% below category average
TeamDesk
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform management overhead8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow engine capability8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform access control7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment creation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Development environment replication6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue recovery6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
-
Ratings
TeamDesk
9.2
Ratings
9% above category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceTeamDesk
Small Businesses
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceTeamDesk
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer ExperienceTeamDesk
Likelihood to Recommend
Salesforce CMS is well suited for those companies which are already using Salesforce. If you want to provide personalized content according to individual customer. If you want to share the content across multiple channels. Salesforce CMS is not typically suited for companies not using salesforce. Simple blogging does not require a Salesforce CMS.
Read full review
TeamDesk is a phenomenal service for our practice. Each legal practice area has unique characteristics that are important to successful practice. Generalized practice management services do address those unique elements because they are created for a mass audience. What makes TeamDesk so helpful is that it can be customized to account for any unique issue that we confront. We use TeamDesk for matter management. It can handle general issues like billing, matter notes, etc.; but it also allows us to track specific details unique to our practice area across each matter and make comparisons that are useful to our practice. Additionally, we have been able to customize it to facilitate our client development efforts.
Read full review
Pros
  • Reporting and Dashboards are thorough and can show a wealth of important data to inform and scale processes. It's helpful in a high volume sales cycle to be able to quickly identify weak points in performance and productivity so that adjustments can be made.
  • Highly customizable. We are able to customize just about everything which allows us to track very specific things and in theory create better efficiency.
  • Parent/Child account hierarchy exists which is helpful.
  • Contact records can be associated with multiple accounts and opportunities. This, in theory, should minimize duplicates and mismanagement of contacts.
  • Console helps a lot with data nesting. Having a fairly comprehensive look at an account without searching through various tabs and sections speeds up an otherwise cumbersome platform.
Read full review
  • The ease of customization has been very helpful. As we use the system longer and decide what works for us and what needs changed, it's a matter of moments to be able to make any desired changes. Much more flexible than anything else we've used in the past.
  • The customer service has been excellent. Any issues that have arisen have been quickly and fully addressed.
Read full review
Cons
  • It takes a while before it recognizes bounced emails.
  • We get so many notifications from a single action. Not sure if this can be modified in the settings though.
  • Error messages are sometimes unclear which makes it hard for us to identify the problem.
Read full review
  • The only down side that I see, is that you have to be willing to spend some time creating your database. You start with a blank canvas and all the tools you need to design a custom database. But, you have to take the time to do it. If you take that time, it is well worth it.
Read full review
Usability
It's very good, but it's still living in a little bit in an older design aspect, but I think a lot of it is about to come out, just hasn't quite gotten there yet. Still a little clunky from a you have to know it to know it or you know it to use it. It takes a little bit of training to get into it. It's not quite the, anybody can come in and start using it immediately, type feel.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Salesforce's support is top-notch. They have subject-matter experts that are accessible at all times to address needs as they come up. They let you know in advance when there are system updates and enhancements so that you are prepared for upcoming changes. I've never had an issue that wasn't addressed immediately when reaching out for support.
Read full review
They are simply amazing. Very fast, like I have a personal support person standing by for me and always solves my problem in one go.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
This fits into the mold with the other Salesforce services. Once you get used to the suite and the nuances of each platform, things become easy. Just read any documentation first, as jumping in will only get you so far, and the more connections with the other apps, the more complex it gets.
Read full review
Prior to Teamdesk we used Excel, an Access database, an online time and expense tracking system, and Dabble DB. Excel and Access had limitations with simultaneous access on the LAN, the online T&E system did only that and was not flexible, and Dabble was flexible, but how can you rely on a company whose goal is to exit, when you want to run your business on their platform. Teamdesk has everything we need.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has a smooth integration with Salesforce CMS application which can make it a positive for enhanced performance.
  • It may require extensive training for new joiners and that can become costly for the organization.
  • It also has automation features that reduce the distribution time by a significant number.
Read full review
  • We are just starting, but I believe it will help to manage our projects more effectively and organize our documents better.
Read full review
ScreenShots

TeamDesk Screenshots

Screenshot of Table Dashboard exampleScreenshot of Record Form exampleScreenshot of Tile View example