Microsoft Azure vs. SAP Business Technology Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Azure
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.
$29
per month
SAP Business Technology Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) is the company's Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offering, that brings together intelligent enterprise applications with database and data management, analytics, integration and extension capabilities into one platform for both cloud and hybrid environments, including hundreds of pre-built integrations for SAP and third-party applications.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft AzureSAP Business Technology Platform
Editions & Modules
Developer
$29
per month
Standard
$100
per month
Professional Direct
$1000
per month
Basic
Free
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft AzureSAP Business Technology Platform
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft AzureSAP Business Technology Platform
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Azure
Chose Microsoft Azure
Obviously this is just based on the virtualisation part of the product, but VM's in Microsoft Azure are well managable and no need to invest in hardware, which gives it an edge in a time where the need for VM's is getting less and less.
Chose Microsoft Azure
I feel that Microsoft Azure typically outperforms Google Cloud Platform in hybrid cloud capabilities, integration aspects, and, primarily, security compliance features. Azure offered superior integration with Microsoft's enterprise software ecosystem, and it's second to none in …
Chose Microsoft Azure
Mostly due to the ecosystem. I don't think there is anything in AWS that we would be missing out when using Microsoft Azure. We use Microsoft products on on-premise servers and also M365 / Office services that are well supported in Microsoft Azure. The pricing between AWS and …
Chose Microsoft Azure
AWS is good for linux virtual machines and mac virtual machines, Microsoft Azure doesn't do mac VMs. However, in my opinion Microsoft Azure is better in every other aspect, easier to use and just as cost effective.
Chose Microsoft Azure
AWS takes the cake here just due to how simple it is to configure IAM roles, users, and policies. Microsoft Azure is nearly neck-and-neck and could probably overtake them in the near future. Splunk for logging isn't that great and Microsoft Azure does a solid job but they could …
Chose Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure is a comprehensive platform that offers almost all functionalities and can provide even more. Due to ongoing extensive developments, additional functionalities are continuously being added and improved. Many new functionalities are also being added that are …
Chose Microsoft Azure
While Azure is a solid and robust platform, VMWare is a much better product with greater usability and features.
Chose Microsoft Azure
Azure works well with the items selected above - ex. Barracuda for backups. Integration is simple and functions.
Chose Microsoft Azure
Azure is more user friendly and provides much required scalability and flexibility.
Chose Microsoft Azure
AWS is the most stable cloud options but Azure has done well in last few years and provides good options specifically for Microsoft customers and who are more familiar with Microsoft technologies like WINDOWS, MS SQL SERVER, GITHUB, VISUAL STUDIO etc. Google cloud is more …
Chose Microsoft Azure
Azure is an ideal platform for disaster recovery and backup. It is very flexible because of its site regeneration capabilities and other features. All of our data can be backup, regardless of the language or operating system. Azure’s inherent flexibility comes from its status …
Chose Microsoft Azure
Remote accessibility for the mass people from the different places where both free and premium service is available that's why people choose Microsoft Azure. The main reason of switching from that to Microsoft Azure is the cost of operation and operating flexibility. The …
Chose Microsoft Azure
AWS and Azure are distinct classes, regardless of how we view them or which sub-areas. Their capabilities are the most comprehensive and sophisticated. Azure will benefit existing Microsoft customers, but AWS has a slight market share advantage. Microsoft Azure offers many …
Chose Microsoft Azure
Veeam Backup for Google Cloud Platform
Chose Microsoft Azure
Ease of use. Multiple Data centers across the globe. Load management. Backup and recovery options.
Chose Microsoft Azure
Because Microsoft Azure has more integrations and possibilities. Also most of the biggest companies are using it, so it gives the security and the back up to trust and work with confidence.
Chose Microsoft Azure
As I continue to evaluate the "big three" cloud providers for our clients, I make the following distinctions, though this gap continues to close. AWS is more granular, and inherently powerful in the configuration options compared to [Microsoft] Azure. It is a "developer" …
Chose Microsoft Azure
We actually utilized multiple cloud stacks, depending upon the customer environment and need. Those that heavily used MS products (Office on-prem or 365), Teams, etc, found it a better fit, with easier integration, for their needs.
Chose Microsoft Azure
I would say that Azure stacks up pretty good and sometimes better in comparison to what Google Cloud Platform has to offer. I don't like GCP for its absurd licensing fees and it's expensive for just Using EC2 Instances. However, DigitalOcean and AWS can offer far better …
Chose Microsoft Azure
The most common alternatives are Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform. AWS is known for its non-existent customer support and abysmal documentation - Azure is clearly better on both fronts. Google Cloud Platform is a solid product, but in my experience Azure Functions …
Chose Microsoft Azure
Integration with other Microsoft products makes Azure stand out quite a bit. However, if you need to use open source software and to integrate with Linux systems then AWS or Google Cloud might be better alternatives. Google did not even come close to Azure in terms of …
Chose Microsoft Azure
We have not tried any alternatives to Microsoft Azure. To cater to our needs, Microsoft Azure was our primary option and it goes well so far. Apart from the application that hosted in service fabric we use azure for other needs like virtual machines, databases. As all our …
SAP Business Technology Platform
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Out of the box Power Platform is more user friendly. The limitations with Power Platform is connecting to more solutions than basic SharePoint, SQL or data verse. When dealing with SAP data it is easier using BTP. approvals are similar in both systems without one being …
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Oracle was at my previous company and SAP Business Technology Platform is at my current company. Both suites are a little difficult to use and have a large learning curve for accounting folks. Both need another app to read GL data and to upload journals. Oracle gave the ability …
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
We've done a little bit of development on AWS on their platform. It's good. It might be a little cheaper, but again, it doesn't connect as natively to SAP applications.
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Main reasons for choosing BTP interoperability with SAP
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
AWS Data Exchange
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Sap centric - decision was easy
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Integration Suite
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Integrate well with RISE
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Scalability
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
It is totally different
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Vey suitable with other SAP ERP products
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Product
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Informatica Cloud API & App Integration
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Microsoft Power Automate and Microsoft Power BI
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Business Technology Platform integrates seamlessly but AWS will be choice for non SAP environments
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Business Technology Platform is used for developing Fiori based applications and used to connect API's.
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
BTP is an integral part of the SAP suite and is required to enable seamless connectivity to other systems.
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Microsoft Power Automate
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Uipath is more used in our org. SAP Business Technology Platform is relatively new to compare currently. Do not have exposure to answer this q fully at this point of time with me. Will possibly have more info later as we work more with SAP Business Technology Platform and have …
Features
Microsoft AzureSAP Business Technology Platform
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Azure
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
SAP Business Technology Platform
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
SAP Business Technology Platform
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft AzureSAP Business Technology Platform
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.6 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft AzureSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.3
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
6.8
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
2.5
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
2.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft AzureSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Actually, migrating to Microsoft Azure is a good solution for almost any situation, especially when all components of your network are ready to become cloud-based. The only drawback I personally encounter frequently is that older software packages cannot always be easily picked up and moved to Microsoft Azure in an optimal manner.
Read full review
If you want to use a well-designed SAP technology to shift into the cloud, you will be more than satisfied with the BTP services overall. There are some improvements for beginners to help them get a better overview of what to do and how to start with their account. My recommendation is to take a foundation training course from the SAP learning hub to prepare for the first steps.
Read full review
Pros
  • Azure simply provides end to end life cycle. Starting from the development to automated deployment, you will find [a] bunch of options. Custom hook-points allow [integration] on-premise resources as well.
  • Excellent documentation around all the services make it really easy for any novice. Overall support by [the] community and Azure Technical team is exceptional.
  • BOT Services, Computer Vision services, ML frameworks provide excellent results as compare to similar services provided by other giants in the same space.
  • Azure data services provide excellent support to ingest data from different sources, ETL, and consumption of data for BI purpose.
Read full review
  • It is very easy to use.
  • All the documentation around it is geared towards the enterprise use case, unlike some other hyperscalers' platforms.
  • The SAP Business Technology Platform is very good because it's got the SAP customer and their business processes in mind. Probably my favorite thing about it is how easy it is to get up and running with a new use case and how well it natively connects to an SAP solution.
Read full review
Cons
  • In our experience, Azure Kubernetes Survice was difficult to set up, which is why we used Kubernetes on top of VMs.
  • Azure REST API is a bit difficult to use, which made it difficult for us to automate our interactions with Azure.
  • Azure's Web UI does a good job of showing metrics on individual VMs, but it would be great if there was a way to show certain metrics from multiple VMs on one dashboard. For example, hard drive usage on our database VMs.
Read full review
  • The Automation Integration service has some outdated workflows
  • New services should be available as entitlements as soon as they are released for a particular region without having to buy them from SAP for zero dollars
  • Any subaccount should be able to change the IAS tenant. Currently, if you set it up for a particular IAS, you cannot change to another tenant and are required to recreate the services in a new subaccount.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been very satisfied with Windows Azure and now a lot of our business depends on it as more teams are now deploying their applications into Azure. Our next step is to have our Infrastructure team move their resources to Azure. It will take awhile for that to happen but we are positive that it will.
Read full review
I think its important to renew the BTP as it's the way to use SAP products in the feature. Java and R/3 systems are obsolete soon and you have to use the cloud products even to be in support and maintenance in the future. Therefore it's needed for every company to read into the BTP.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft Azure's overall usability has been better than expected. Often times vendors promise the world, only to leave you with a run-down town. Not the case with our experience. From an implementation perspective, all went perfect, and from the user-facing experience we have had no technical issues, just some learning curve issues that are more about "why" than "how"
Read full review
The development and deployment of applications require too many services. So, sometimes it is challenging as there are multiple services. The monitoring and logging mechanisms are not very apparent. This makes it difficult to choose the services required during design. Applications that use AI for eg., extraction or chatbots, are great use cases to build on BTP. Also custom applications that require a ERP integration but are not enhancements, are good use cases for development on BTP.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
It has proven to be unreliable in our production environment and services become unavailable without proper notification to system administrators
Read full review
Services are generally available
Read full review
Support Rating
Support is easy with all the knowledge base articles available for free on the web. Plus, if you have a preferred status you can leverage their concierge support to get rapid response. Sometimes they’ll bounce you around a lot to get you to the right person, but they are quite responsive (especially when you are paying for the service). Many of the older Microsoft skills are also transferable from old-school on-prem to Azure-based virtual interfaces.
Read full review
The biggest problem we ran into was communication between SAP Business Technology Platform and onsite resources. Unfortunately our SAP Business Technology Platform and Cloud systems are under different customer numbers. I constantly had to open tickets under each customer number because I was unsure of where the issue lied. And having to create a dummy ticket for our ECC systems to open the ECC connections for another ticket under the Cloud customer is a pain.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Training material in Developers Community or from Learning hub are really good... also most of the time we route through Discovery center... so materials provided by SAP is really good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
As I have mentioned before the issue with my Oracle Mismatch Version issues that have put a delay on moving one of my platforms will justify my 7 rating.
Read full review
Having a full cloud native environment for devlopment of microservices and digitals solutions while having standardized access to our core data on SAP via cloud connector is one of the main benefits of using BTP over others hypervisors. BTP is the standard hyperscaler as soon as something relies on data from SAP systems in our company now
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I feel that Microsoft Azure typically outperforms Google Cloud Platform in hybrid cloud capabilities, integration aspects, and, primarily, security compliance features. Azure offered superior integration with Microsoft's enterprise software ecosystem, and it's second to none in my opinion. This made it the natural choice for most, especially if heavily invested in Windows, Office 365, or Active Directory deployments. We chose Azure over GCP because we simply needed Windows workload support as a strong driver, more access to global regions, and let's not forget that most tech teams in an organization are Microsoft Certified, which makes skillset transfer from on-prem to cloud a minimal learning curve over shifting to a different provider.
Read full review
SAP Business Technology Platform is easily connectable using standard solutions to the onpremise backend SAP systems. Services can be linked with each other and with SAP systems in a managed and secure way, while with the other products getting the data, access and networking done is cumbersome. Also we can make sure to have all cloud environments in the same region using the multi cloud approach wich reduces latency problems.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It's scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Times and growth went into it. By balancing on-premises maintenance with continuous cloud improvements, we’ve budgeted and planned endlessly increased capacity.
  • In today’s world of cyber-crime, clients can put even more faith in what they’ve heard. We built an innovative single-sign-on hub for all users. Also, other business platforms use Azure application gateways, reducing worker switching time and increasing productivity.
  • Its step can automate to improve the investment. In addition, we can integrate our organization’s credentials into an authorization for other systems.
Read full review
  • Ours is a little different than a typical customer because we use the platform to develop new integrations for our mutual customers.
  • Some of the requirements for integrations can be limiting compared to other platforms on the market.
  • The integration support for SAP specific applications and especially those in cloud-centric uses is best in class.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Business Technology Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Process Automation, an SAP BTP service