Tebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.
$150
per provider/per month
Tipalti
Score 7.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Tipalti automates critical financial processes to drive efficiency, including accounts payable, mass payments, procurement, and expenses, all on one global finance automation platform that grows with the organization, automating, de-risking and simplifying finance.
$129
per month
Pricing
Tebra EHR
Tipalti
Editions & Modules
Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
$150
per provider/per month
Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
$300
per provider/per month
Kareo Billing Services
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tebra EHR
Tipalti
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
Pricing starts at $149 per month for the platform fee. Users can upgrade to Tipalti's more advanced capabilities as their businesses gets more complex.
The Tipalti pricing model is designed to grow with the user's company. Advanced features such as W-8 tax forms, international tax IDs, or multi-entity payables are available as needed.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tebra EHR
Tipalti
Features
Tebra EHR
Tipalti
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
4.0
5 Ratings
61% below category average
Tipalti
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification
4.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Claims management
4.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Coding
4.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
1.0
4 Ratings
154% below category average
Tipalti
-
Ratings
Calendar interface
1.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
2.2
5 Ratings
106% below category average
Tipalti
-
Ratings
Charting / document management
1.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Templates
2.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Patient portal
1.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Speech recognition
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
1.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
E-prescribing
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
8.0
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Tipalti
-
Ratings
HIPAA compliance
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
Tebra EHR
-
Ratings
Tipalti
8.8
62 Ratings
17% above category average
Customizable Approval Policies
00 Ratings
8.650 Ratings
Financial Document Management
00 Ratings
8.147 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking
00 Ratings
9.259 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail
00 Ratings
9.053 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection
00 Ratings
9.052 Ratings
Advanced OCR
00 Ratings
8.545 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer
00 Ratings
9.348 Ratings
Accounts Payable
Comparison of Accounts Payable features of Product A and Product B
Kareo is not an appropriate application for any real-world clinical need. It is highly unreliable, crashing frequently, and often becomes frozen. It also cannot ingest data from Therapy Notes, which was a promised feature of the platform according to the sales team. Additionally, when we ran into reliability issues (every day, with every clinician at the practice, across a dozen different office locations with different internet service providers) we were not offered the ability to cancel our contract. Until the reliability issues are fixed Kareo is not well-suited to any use case because it does not work.
I would tell them that it manually syncs to ERPS. Additionally I would include the fact that you can pay multiple entities in one pay run allowing to be very efficient. I would also include that they can add rules to bill approvals or set up auto payments for certain vendors. Lastly, there are many reports you can run providing you will very informational data in seconds.
The report that provides the "Not payable" vendors does not work well for us, particularly because the sync to our ERP goes both ways, which means all of the employees also sync over to Tipalti and remain as Not Payable. So the list is very long, and I don't find a good use for it.
Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
Solid system performance. Suits our needs and solution provider very inclined to accept feedback and involve users in developing the solution to serve both the provider and the ultimate user. Tipalti has streamlined our process that was previously very manual and prone to error. Now there is transparency of information and role.
Two-time Tipalti selector, implementor, and user. The payment features in the app saves many steps in the payment process. No longer do you have to set-up or upload payment information to your bank and then go back to your accounting system and mark items as paid. Tipalti does all of this with a click of a mouse. The payment feature is the stand out feature. Many vendors can process your invoices. Look at how at the payment process of others.....you will see.
Since I also work in customer support, I often have to contact Tipalti's team with questions from our users. Tipalti's support team has always been exceptionally helpful and it was a pleasure to communicate with them. I have always received prompt responses to any inquiries and they are excellent at solving our customers' issues within a short time
I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
From initial implementation through to user experience, Tipalti has been able to exceed our expectations in terms of its functionality and useability. We have found with other systems implemented in the past they did not match our expectations which resulted in us terminating these services.
We have negative reviews as we were sold a product that left out some key variables. Things we really needed to make the transition.
I don't think KAREO is good for small business (0-10 employees) because their prices for additional or standard features is steep. They charge by the therapist to boot and it is steep!
Again ASK questions; do a test run; ask about the migration of your data and its charges.
You sign with them you will be locked into a 12 month contract with no out clause. If they are costing you the money you have to stay with them.
Vendor onboarding has taken the responsibility from one person to the Vendor directly. This provides the vendor with the ability to enter their own banking information for payments and upload their Federal W9 form.
Vendors can upload their own invoices to the system, taking the possibility that our AP team did not receive an emailed or mailed invoice to upload. This also increases payment efficiency as the vendor's invoice is processed in a more timely manner.
AP can review invoices for accuracy and concentrate on how to code an invoice, rather than be a paper pusher or a data entry clerk. AP doesn't spend time searching for invoices that might be a duplicate, the system will communicate this on the software review process and if AP has uploaded by email the same invoice multiple times, an email will be sent to AP to indicate that the invoice was not uploaded due to duplication.