UserIQ vs. Usersnap

In UserIQ campaigns, you can probably create whatever content you have in mind for your campaigns using IFrames. You can probably implement whatever content you have in mind for your campaigns using IFrames in UserIQ campaigns.

Incentivized

Definitely a great tool that is way better than just recording web QA feedback in a Google Doc or via email. Everything goes straight into a queue and it is easy to tag what you are talking about with the tool. Leaves less room for misinterpretation and keeps a record of all feedback so nothing gets missed. Filtering within the feedback queue and search functionality to avoid duplicates would be helpful.

Incentivized

• Have a really easy way to tag features and know what you're tracking.
• Great, simple user walkthroughs that you can plug into your app to improve onboarding or increase feature adoption.
• Some interesting dashboard views and you can slice users/accounts many different ways.
• Pretty user-friendly interface.
• Easy to collect qualitative data (nps, survey, etc.).

Incentivized

• Organize customer feedback.
• Provide an easy to use, feature-rich widget that allows users to highlight, comment and even draw on a screenshot of your application.
• Screenshots that are sent to you include meta-data like the browser user agent, browser console data, screen resolution, etc.

Incentivized

• Getting the hang of the walkthroughs took me awhile and was hard for me to understand, but now I understand and love them!

Incentivized

• When you go into the list of Usersnap feedback you have submitted, there isn't search functionality or filtering so that you can see the feedback of a certain type at a time, or see if you submitted that feedback already.

Incentivized

This rating is given as to a certain degree it is useful - as in the customer health dashboard and providing a very fast service which is easy to use for our users. However, as mentioned prior, the exportation of this data into presentable information (presentation style) is not really possible without doing yourself via screenshots and interpreting the data.

Incentivized

Customer service and support is one of the biggest strengths for UserIQ, whenever there has been any issues or confusion, the help service is very effective and friendly to support us and get to a conclusion within no time, hence why the ranking given is extremely high for this factor. I would not say any improvement is needed in terms of this aspect of the company.

Incentivized

I am unsure how to rate the support of Usersnap as I did not contact support yet. The tool works well as is. The agency we work with that used the tool didn't need to contact Usersnap support as well. I'm sure the user support on the tool is adequate.

Incentivized

When comparing with the other product of the market we realize UserIQ brings the best outcome beneath the price so we choose UserIQ apart from other products.

Incentivized

Prior to Usersnap we looked at and even tried to bring up Bugzilla, but it requires a lot of maintenance and customization in my opinion. We needed something that was ready to use out of the box, which Usersnap certainly was. The other problem with Bugzilla is that it's mostly for software development bugs, that is, bugs submitted by developers, not really end users. Yes, it can be used by end-users, but not as intuitively as Usersnap.

Incentivized

• UserIQ has let us communicate more effectively with our customers. We have seen a reduction in calls to customer service on how to utilize and update items on our SaaS UI.

Incentivized

• Usersnap has allowed us to implement a solution that allows end-users to communicate with us with very little effort.

Incentivized