Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$10
per month per user
XWiki
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
XWiki is an open-source collaborative platform designed to enhance business collaboration and streamline knowledge management for companies of all sizes. As a an alternative to proprietary knowledge bases, XWiki offers a structured second-generation wiki with over 900 pre-made extensions, enabling businesses to add features and customize their XWiki instance to meet specific needs. This level of customization enhances the collaborative environment and operational efficiency. Key…
$12
per month 10 users
Pricing
WrikeXWiki
Editions & Modules
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month per user
Wrike Business
$24.8
per month per user
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Standard
€12
per month 10 users
Pro Silver
€35
per month 10 users
Pro Gold
€575
per month 10 users
Pro Platinum
€1150
per month 10 users
On-Premise
Custom Pricing
(Pro Plans available for On-Premise deployment)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
WrikeXWiki
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.17% discount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Features
WrikeXWiki
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Wrike
7.9
707 Ratings
4% above category average
XWiki
-
Ratings
Task Management8.6701 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management7.7590 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.8493 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.0612 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.6595 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.6700 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology7.9360 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology8.1318 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.3591 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.2536 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access7.6509 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.1319 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management7.723 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.9239 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Wrike
7.8
242 Ratings
4% above category average
XWiki
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates8.21 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting8.0238 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software7.7137 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
WrikeXWiki
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.4 out of 10
Front
Front
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.4 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.4 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
WrikeXWiki
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(741 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(95 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(57 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.5
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(84 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.5
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.6
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(30 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.1
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
6.6
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.8
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
7.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
6.3
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.7
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
WrikeXWiki
Likelihood to Recommend
Wrike
My organization used Google Sheets to work with subbies, but we've since switched to Wrike. It is user friendly, has formulas and customizable fields. Wrike has been a lifesaver because instead of sharing Google Sheets with external customers and typically they messing up - deleting formulas, users can simply fill out a request form without logging into Wrike . All details are displayed in a table view, making management much easier.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
Read full review
Pros
Wrike
  • Wrike has been consistent in emailing any updates or changes to each person involved in each task.
  • Wrike has a simple to navigate website, with quick access to each task.
  • Wrike keeps all data files located at the top of the task for quick reference, which makes it easier for each team member to find.
  • Wrike adds date tags as well as any edited or deleted notes where we are able to cross-reference any major changes that may have been made.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
  • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
  • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
Read full review
Cons
Wrike
  • The email notifications that are automatically sent from Wrike when something is done are easy for users to miss or ignore.
  • Reporting can be limited. You have to create workarounds for collecting/storing the name of the person submitting the form in instances where they do not have their own Wrike license.
  • A more user-friendly interface, especially for those less familiar with project management software, would enhance overall accessibility.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Usability
Wrike
Wrike, overall, is pretty easy to setup and use. I still find challenges in changing milestone dates but our programs / date changes are different than industry standard so that is partly the issue. We love the Excel look along with the dashboards! There are also built in analytics that really assist in seeing where the projects are!
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Performance
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Wrike
Support is very quickly and they want to solve problems actively. When I need additional info I can use community forum, when I've an issue I can use support form to get help. The support is of excellent quality from the first level, to grow when you talk to the engineers it becomes even more important
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Wrike
I have not used other products except Microsoft Teams channels with file sharing and standard sharing from Adobe, text and email messaging, and Zoom/gotomeeting sharing. This is the first product that I have used that had the functionality and platform where the sharing is simplistic. It is better than standard sharing through email or other simple forms because everything stays together.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
  • Fast app development framework with very rich API
  • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Wrike
not sure
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Wrike
  • Adding versions of a document streamlines our editing process, preventing us from reviewing outdated versions of a document. This feature saves time, especially when working with external contributors who may not know Wrike well.
  • Blueprints save time because we do not have to manually enter all the details when scheduling a recurring project.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of Wrike TemplatesScreenshot of Team WorkloadScreenshot of Wrike ReportsScreenshot of Wrike apps & integrationsScreenshot of Wrike Gantt Chart

XWiki Screenshots

Screenshot of an XWiki homepageScreenshot of knowledge management, in XWiki.Screenshot of the granular rights access feature, that helps users to manage big teams.Screenshot of some of the customizations available in every aspect of an instance, from theme to templates and page structure.Screenshot of an example of migration from Confluence using the dedicated migrator.