A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
System Administrator in Information Technology at JET e-business (51-200 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Hyper-V as a virtualization solution for our environment. As we host several Windows-based applications built with Microsoft solutions, we decided to run our virtualized environment on their technology, prioritizing reliability and compliance with MS licensing. Over the years, we have also deployed some Linux-based applications, and Hyper-V still performs this role very well, hosting dozens of virtual machines running Linux-based OSs.
Pros
Management of very large virtual machines.
High availability of virtualized environment.
Virtualization of physical network.
Very fast boot of virtual machines.
Hability of moving VMs from one host to another.
Reliable instrumentation for IaaC with PowerShell.
Cons
VHD Set support for Cluster Shared Volumes.
VM console improvements, such as more integration with hosting OS.
Native backup solution.
Return on Investment
Positive: every Windows Server VM is automatic licensed.
Positive: friendly user interface for management.
Positive: fast deploy of new VMs.
Positive: very fast boot of Windows Server based VMs.
Negative: missing a native backup tool.
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Oracle VirtualBox, VMware ESXi and Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
Other Software Used
Windows Server Failover Clustering, Microsoft IIS, pfSense, OpenVPN Access Server, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, SolarWinds Serv-U, Microsoft Teams
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Manager in Information Technology (11-50 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We are a managed service provider focusing on the SMB market. We virtualize every server we put out to bolster supportability, disaster recovery, scalability, and ease our next lifestyle migration by divorcing the production environment from the hardware all together. Hyper-V's simplicity of implmentation and inexpensive licensing (included in Windows server) allows us to do this and lower the cost to service our customers while providing superior functionality!
Pros
Allows for agilty
Runs production reliably
Enhances backup and disaster recovery abilites
Gives us a secure platform from which to admin the production environment
Cons
Limited functionality without domain joined hosts
Return on Investment
Positive ROI reducing hardware lifecycle replacement costs by 50 or greater compared to no virtualization
Positive ROI due to RTO being reduced 25-50% and enabling simplicity of remote recovery as compared to no virtualization
Positive ROI due to no licensing costs above and beyond windows server licenses where as many other virtualization platforms require additional licensing
Usability
Alternatives Considered
VMware vSphere
Other Software Used
WatchGuard AuthPoint, Huntress, Microsoft 365, ConnectWise Automate, ConnectWise PSA, Veeam ONE, Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows, Synology DiskStation, FluentCloud
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Account Manager in Information Technology (11-50 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Our company use Hyper-V virtualization software for production servers and replication of virtual machines between multiple physical hosts. It allows to isolate our VMs from hardware level and run multiple VMs on one host. For example, production software servers plus Domain controllers plus File shares all in one host computer.
Pros
virtualization of multiple machines
Replication
vhdd management
Cons
Tracking and alerts for replication status
Return on Investment
Saving $ on server hardware by running multiple server VM at once
License savings for Microsoft licensing
Usability
Alternatives Considered
VMware ESXi, VMware Fusion, VMware Workstation Pro and AWS Organizations
Other Software Used
VMware ESXi, AWS Backup, AWS Certificate Manager, AWS Service Catalog
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (11-50 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
It helps to setup, maintain and troubleshoot virtual machines to critical services like application and data servers, phone systems, email backup appliances, etc.
Pros
Built-in, free hypervisor
Easy remote access through Remote Desktop Services
Easy management through the Hyper-V console or remote via the Windows Admin Center
Cons
Almost impossible to upgrade between version 1 and version virtual machines
Basic built-in backup and replication services offered through the native Hyper-V console. Only Azure backup offerings available at the Windows Admin Center
If the Hyper-V feature is disabled, it's difficult to access your VMs Configuration Files and Virtual Hard Disks
Return on Investment
No upfront cost giving that you have already workstations and servers you can use it on
In-house deployment so costs are reduced to the antivirus/backup solution of your choice
In-house migration of VMs between hosts so the cost is only for a new host
Usability
Alternatives Considered
VMware Workstation Player and VMware Workstation Pro
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Senior Information Technology Specialist in Information Technology at Öksüt Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. (501-1000 employees employees)
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Hyper-V in our organization for Virtual servers with various roles and also for virtual clients for test applications. Our scope of use case has two main cases first having virtual servers to update/upgrade servers easily/revert changes or bring servers back online from backups and also having virtual clients for testing new applications, group policy rules, and other organizational changes
Pros
Editing configuration of virtual machines.
Installing Windows operating system based VM client computer easier than rivals.
Efficient resource use and management.
Cons
Able to use usb drives for operating system installation without needing .iso file.
Dedicated gpu virtualisation could be easier for VMs.
The console interface could be improved and shows a small thumbnail of running machines.
Most Important Features
Based on windows OS environment.
Easy to install and remove.
Efficient resource management.
Clean and easy user interface.
Return on Investment
With Hyper-V implementing new software or rules on a test, beds take fewer resources and time which is a great bonus.
Virtual SAN management and Virtual Switch management make it easy to manage network and storage options.
Editing the disk option made us resize disks on the fly and saved us maintenance, production time, and costs.