A heavier Wiki platform, but good to integrate with other Atlassian systems
Overall Satisfaction with Atlassian Confluence
In the past, we've used Confluence to store nearly everything: onboarding documentation links to resources, basic client details, new projects coming down the pipe. We've changed that approach to be more minimalistic and only use Confluence for a specific project or two since we can maintain that other information through other sources.
Pros
- Integration with other Atlasssian projects.
- Editor basics
- Tools/extensions
Cons
- Document organization
- Overall navigation of system
- Document formatting
- Integration
- Price
- Features
- Provided concise code/issue/documentation platform
- Saved time
- Saved resources
Not in the product listings, but we've started using GitBooks for a lot of our Wiki/documentation-based needs. Compared to Confluence, it is a lot more lightweight and easily provides version history when edits need to be tracked. It doesn't have quite the file management/discussion capabilities like Confluence, but for lightweight documentation needs, it works better.
Do you think Atlassian Confluence delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Atlassian Confluence's feature set?
Yes
Did Atlassian Confluence live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Atlassian Confluence go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Atlassian Confluence again?
No
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation