browserstack user update.
October 05, 2025
browserstack user update.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Enterprise
Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack
We use BrowserStack primarily for testing our mobile and web applications across multiple devices, browsers, and operating systems. It helps us run automation scripts (Appium + TestNG / Selenium) and also allows our QA team to perform manual validation using App Live/Browser Live. This ensures cross-platform and cross-browser compatibility without maintaining a physical device lab.
Pros
- SSO feature for android and ios.
- Multiple test runs on different devices at the same time.
- By using the app for live accessibility testing.
Cons
- interactive debugging is not possible with app automate.
- Capturing of live sms is bit difficult setup.
- Some of the common methods that can be used in Android and IOS should be handled from the BrowserStack YML.
- App automate.
- App live.
- Test management.
- Cost saving.
- Increase team productivity.
- Scalability for Business Growth.
Slow Testing Cycles-Manual testing on a few devices took a lot of time.
Regression testing delayed releases. Difficulty in Reproducing Customer Issues
When customers reported bugs on specific devices, reproducing them was hard without access to the same hardware.
Regression testing delayed releases. Difficulty in Reproducing Customer Issues
When customers reported bugs on specific devices, reproducing them was hard without access to the same hardware.
- App Automate
Supports Appium & TestNG Integration, Cross-Device & Cross-OS Testing, Parallel Test Execution.
Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?
Yes
Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BrowserStack again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation