Cherwell - a true enterprise service management solution!
Updated October 18, 2022
Cherwell - a true enterprise service management solution!
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cherwell Service Management
We use Cherwell Service Management as an enterprise service management solution - where our IT department is actually NOT the largest consumer of the tool! We have branched out from the typical ITSM processes in Cherwell to use it for managing new store openings, DC safety incidents, and numerous finance-related workflows unique to our organization. We are able to consolidate more and more of our organizational functions within a single pane of glass, which is precisely the reason (and one of the many benefits) of purchasing Cherwell.
Pros
- Workflow Management
- Automation
- Integrations
- No-code/low-code content development
- Flexibility to use on multiple operating systems
Cons
- Updated web UI/UX
- Standardized form creation
- Improved machine learning
- Built-in AI chat bot
- Saved thousands of dollars on third-party products by developing the same solution in Cherwell.
- The ability to have cross-functional departments using the same tool increases efficiency considerably.
- Knowledge Management has assisted to drive customers to self-help, allowing support teams to focus on more important objectives.
- BMC Helix ITSM (Remedy), CA Service Management and with CA Service Desk Manager
Both Remedy & CA were far more complex to implement, enhance and support. The architecture and framework each solution was developed on didn't lend itself to be no-code or low-code like Cherwell, and therefore the ability to expand and utilize either tool on an enterprise-level was severely restricted. The cost-benefit of those options vs Cherwell was also a primary reason to steer clear.
Do you think Cherwell Service Management (discontinued) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Cherwell Service Management (discontinued) live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Cherwell Service Management (discontinued) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cherwell Service Management (discontinued) again?
Yes
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued) Feature Ratings
Using Cherwell Service Management
10000 - Several departments in the organization are using Cherwell, from distribution centers, retail, HR, IT, InfoSec, Finance, Transport, and Legal. There is more usage by departments outside of IT, making Cherwell a true ESM tool in our organization.
4 - Our team comprises of a manager (who also helps with some development), two BAs (one principal one senior), and a developer. We cross-train as much as possible but each have our primary responsibilities.
- ITSM
- Distribution Center Safety Management
- HR
- Retail New Store
- DC Safety Management process to report incidents & send data to OSHA
- New retail store opening process that uses user-managed templates to generate hundreds of tasks at various stages of the workflow
- Europe transport claims for issuing credits/invoices to suppliers
- Integrating with HR solutions (i.e. Workday, Kronos, etc.)
- MS Teams integration (inc. cards)
- Future DC safety enhancements (inspections)
Evaluating Cherwell Service Management and Competitors
Yes - We had an extremely old version of Remedy which had to be supported by external vendors due to the complex nature of the tool. It lacked a lot of core (common) functionality on the market today and the expense of keeping (or upgrading) didn't match the benefit of keeping it.
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
Cherwell has the richest feature-set in the market today, and is incredibly flexible to develop within. There are no other tools that offer no-code/low-code as effectively. The cost of the licensing is reasonable (and concurrent) which made it an easy sell financially.
I don't believe our evaluation/selection would change. We had a robust RFP to determine the best tool on the market for our organization.
Cherwell Service Management Implementation
- Third-party professional services
We are hosted as a SaaS client by Ivanti (formerly Cherwell, who stood up our environment for us).
Yes - We spent over a year designing and developing the product in-house. That included rebuilding Incident/Request, Change, the self-service portal and some customized objects for announcements. The service catalog was built from scratch, and now spans over 800+ services on offer - which we were able to build based on several meetings with every single stakeholder who would house their service offerings in Cherwell. We have 400+ forms on our portal site as a result of those meetings & requirements gathering.
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled - Change management had their own requirements for their process that was custmozied by Cherwell as a part of our project (since our in-house developer was focused on other features). The down-side is that Cherwell just did as they were told, without sanity checking the requirements provided, and unfortunately there was some overly-complex solutions in place for Change that were ultimately not necessary.
- Stakeholders being change-averse, due to their lack of understanding of Cherwell & pushing out the timeline
Cherwell Service Management Training
Configuring Cherwell Service Management
Start simple and work from there. You will come across some wild requirements when developing content in Cherwell, and I usually try to talk people off the edge and start with something more streamlined and build upon it as they determine what their needs actually are. As I have said, you can build really complex solutions in Cherwell (and sometimes you have to), but documenting that and supporting it has to be taken into consideration too.
Yes - we have customized the interface extensively - I have had several years experience with Cherwell, so developing entirely customized solutions from nothing has been both fun and relatively easy to do. Depending on the organization's usage of Cherwell, you will often step outside the boundaries of ITSM and move more into the ESM space - which is what we've done. We have really taken the core capabilities of Cherwell content and used it across several departments in our organization.
No - we have not done any custom code
We have also integrated with numerous systems in our organization - something else that is fairly straight forward to do using REST API calls via One-Steps!
Cherwell Service Management Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Immediate help available | Slow Resolution Poor followup Less knowledgeable Problems left unsolved Not kept informed Escalation required Need to explain problems multiple times Support doesn't seem to care Slow Initial Response |
Yes, we had to. Ordinary support was that bad. Premium support has so far not really lived up to the expectations (or cost), but response times are generally more prompt. However, we still have the same issues with resolution times, the skills of the support staff, etc.
Yes - Some bugs were resolved in future releases, there are some I logged 3 years ago which still have not been addressed. Development for bug fixes in Cherwell is not quick, and fixes depend on you upgrading the entire platform which is not desirable either.
Using Cherwell Service Management
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | None |
- API integrations
- Workflows
- Form design
- Automation
- Dashboards
- Reports
Cherwell Service Management Reliability
Integrating Cherwell Service Management
- Pagerduty
- Jira
- MS Graph
- Loopback to Cherwell
- In-house enterprise service APIs
- MS Teams
- File import/export
- Single Signon
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
If it makes sense to integrate with another system to streamline workflows and processes, then don't be afraid to do it. It's easily controlled and maintained and secure!
Relationship with Ivanti
Unknown by me.
Stand your ground, and escalate when you need to (which you will probably need to).
Upgrading Cherwell Service Management
Yes - We always do extensive testing prior to any upgrades; and sometimes there are things we miss. However, after each upgrade, even if we did miss something, there's almost always a workaround we can put in place to address it. The major issues we've had with upgrades is the vendor (support); they often do something wrong, or forget to configure something the way it previously was, and they take a LONG time to upgrade (in excess of 2 hours sometimes). The process on-prem would take 20 mins max. - but being a SaaS customer you don't have the luxury of an experienced engineer upgrading your environment, nor are they solely focusing on your upgrade at that point in time (they're still answering calls and working other tickets).
- Increased browser performance & parity
- Improved UI for forms
- Bug fixes!!
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation