Easy Deployment
June 08, 2023
Easy Deployment
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- MX64
- MX100
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX
Connecting remote sites back to the head-in. Currently replacing all site from LTE to physical Circuits
- SD - WAN
- Utilization and Health reports
- easy to replace
- To see specifically which MAC address is being learned at what physical port
- traceroute using the actual network and not just the wan
- CLI or more troubleshooting commands
Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?
Yes
- Positive - Less travel to Remote sites.
We can easily tell which site has gone down and the physical address of the place. Then we can see if the ISP is having issues or not. No need to go to the remote site to troubleshoot.
Cisco SD-WAN vs Meraki Solution. ANd Meraki won very easy in this selection
Cisco Meraki MX Feature Ratings
Using Cisco Meraki MX
500 - Wireless and SD-WAN
- Deployment
- Managing
- Troubleshooting
- Failover
- Redundancy
Evaluating Cisco Meraki MX and Competitors
Cisco Meraki MX Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Quick Initial Response | None |
Not sure
Using Cisco Meraki MX
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Relatively simple Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | Requires technical support |
- Health Check
- Software Upgrades
- Replacement
- Finding MAC address mapping to physical port