SDWAN for WTB
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX
Currently deploying to our remote branches. Is replacing current SDWAN. MX85 in the branches and MX250 in the NOC and backup datacenter.
Pros
- Firewall
- SDWAN
- DHCP
Cons
- VIP on the branch end of auto VPN
- Aggregating LAN uplinks to Cisco Meraki MX in a HA
- Needing an IP or range for some traffic shaping rules instead of FQDN
- easy to deploy
- SDWAN with multiple circuits has issues
Easy for an associate engineer to deploy from a template, add the devices to the network and prepare them for deployment.
Simplified and consistent across the environment with a cloud dashboard.
Ease of use and deployment
Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?
No
Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation