Overall Satisfaction with Jama Connect
Requirements management both at SW and system level. At software level: support the automation process for code auto generation, software test procedures auto generation and Interface Control Documents management. Management of test activities through customised items (as explained in GitHub - jamasoftware-ps/Automated-Testing: Sample code illustrating possible approaches to importing automated test results). At system level: management of Assembly Integration and Verification test activities through test run items.
- Traceability
- Reporting
- Requirements import/export
- User friendly API
- More flexibility in creating customised item types (for example: add possibility to use "step"-like tables in a custom way)
- Even if API is found to be user friendly, testing automation process is not. For example, lack of SW test items that can be automated
Do you think Jama Connect delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Jama Connect's feature set?
Yes
Did Jama Connect live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Jama Connect go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Jama Connect again?
Yes
- Not able to provide this information, since we have used Jama Connect for less than 1 year
Improve our requirement management. Comply with standards in the space industry. Since we have used Jama Connect for less than 1 year, the achievement of our objectives is still ongoing
Features (traceability, collaboration, reviews and workflows for approvation process, suspect links) provided in Jama Connect were not available in the other tools we have used in the past.
From a technical point of view, DOORS is much more customizable than Jama Connect, and this is more useful when talking about SW related requirements; when talking about system related requirements, Jama Connect is well suited with respect to DOORS, in the sense that collaboration is much easier in Jama Connect.