Great for Higher Ed
September 08, 2021
Great for Higher Ed

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
I am a professor at a large university, teaching design studios (interior architecture), professional practice, and structures. I use Miro as a primary student engagement platform--progress pin-ups, collaborative team spaces, digital presentation boards, etc. Miro helps keep us engaged in a visual platform, allows for collaborative learning and feedback, and helps my students stay accountable (since they can revisit work that would otherwise have been taken down).
Pros
- A digitally accessible graphic platform that can host a variety of content.
- Manage multiple users (with engagement tracking) and teams.
- Clean presentation mode when tools are no longer needed--great for virtual engagement.
Cons
- The limits on the educational license are very challenging. Students can create boards and the only workflow for the professor to delete them is to remove the student from the team, reassign the board, re-invite the student, and manually delete the board.
- Only having one workspace for educators is challenging. Managing multiple "teams" (aka classes) within the workspace is confusing when there are multiple courses, and possibly breakout teams within each course. It would be great to have a workspace per course, or the ability to filter the team's list. Scrolling can be overwhelming, and naming for filtering becomes long and cumbersome.
- Filtering the boards can be challenging when there are dozens to sort through.
- Establishing templates could be a more straightforward process. Creating a board > saving as a template > applying a template isn't always intuitive.
- Exporting a board can be incredibly challenging when the board contains quite a bit of content.
- In March 2019 our university cancelled in-person learning on the Thursday of spring break. I was able to adapt to online learning in a matter of days (three classes, 125 students) and was up and running by the following Monday.
- During class presentations, I open up the floor for comments and questions using digital tagging and notifications. Miro has enabled us to create a more collaborative community of learning, which I have learned from and continue to implement today.
- Improved accountability--when my students can see everyone's work, and I can see whose work is missing--it is easier for me to take a snapshot, track who submitted deliverables on time and follow up with students who may be falling behind.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
- Google Slides and Prezi
Google Slides integrates well with our university account system, but it forces linear presentation/content, which is not always appropriate. I had challenges managing Prezi as an individual and never used it to collaborate with multiple people, much less a full team. The zoomy navigation can also be off-putting at times.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation