Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Miro is being used by various departments, employees, students, and professors at the university. We use it for collaboration and interaction in class and in research projects. It is also used to brainstorm with peers and to structure problems. I have started using it during the pandemic to help foster interaction in class and to facilitate workshops. We now even use Moro to make plans and illustrations for publications, for instance by building conceptual maps.
- Class interaction.
- Building model structure.
- Brainstorming.
- Conceptual maps.
- Moving around.
- Adding comments to a board.
- Voting is not easy.
- Adding emojis could be made simpler.
- Higher quality education.
- More dynamic learning.
- Developing new facilitating skills.
- Working together on a common object without being in the same room.
Tremendously. It is the number one board software that we use at our organization. It really allows to connect around a common object that will be created by multiple participants. Everybody can, without an account, connect and use it quite easily.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
- Klaxoon, Zoom and Microsoft Teams
Miro is easier to use and allows you to have your window where you have your colleagues' faces to be on the side while you use the app. It is fast, reliable, and has many different options.