Miro flow
February 17, 2022
Miro flow

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
I am currently building workflows for chronic disease digital capabilities. We incorporate triggers, timelines, and grouping of disease content. I create the drawings and share them with colleagues for edits as well as during presentations. Sometimes I call in support from systems designers who can ensure a more crisp appearance of the workflows.
Pros
- Border color and pattern options.
- Allow pull to front or push to back options for images.
- Allow grouping of frames.
- Color coding.
Cons
- Capabilities fail when more than one user.
- Text boxes versus shapes get confusing.
- Highlighting to move sections can be cumbersome to ensure all of what you want is captured and nothing more.
- Improved communication between clinicians and product managers on desired capabilities.
- Ability to align across products on functionality.
- Ensures access by multiple stakeholders.
Yes, we work off of Miro boards often for planning and goal setting. This allows asynchronous as well as synchronous work. It is sometimes a little choppy when multiple people are on a document and you want to see where they are working; their name tag covers the workspace. Not sure if they could have initials or something else?
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Visio is something I used over 10 yrs ago, but not sure it's still on the market. It at least provided the arrows to create flow diagrams but didn't have as much functionality as Miro to move comments around and allow multiple users to engage at a time, whether synchronously or asynchronously.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation