Good collaboration tool that have better software performance
Updated September 01, 2023

Good collaboration tool that have better software performance

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

We usually use Miro to create diagrams, collaborate in a team, and run meetings. Everyone in the organization has access to Miro, and it is commonly used.
  • Collaboration features
  • Sharing capabilities
  • DIagram options
  • Performance is sometimes slow
  • Stability issues, sometimes have to restart
  • Some features are not easy to find
  • improved productivity
  • improved communication
  • increased collaboration
If the UI performance can be improved to provide a smoother user experience, that would be appreciated. Also, we often run into the problem of Miro showing a blank window and it needs to be restarted occasionally.
We have embedded Miro into some other applications like Confluence. We haven't used this feature extensively.
It does help especially with remote workers and also a collaboration with people from different locations. The company is large, so some people are in different cities across the country. The meeting collaboration features expand the tools and ways of interacting during meetings.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?


Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Miro again?


These two alternative products provide a smoother UI experience. They are more suited for engineering diagrams. However, Miro seems to be better for collaboration, whiteboard, and sticky note experience.
There are some templates or formats that some people use to chair and organize meetings. I find those to be unique and effective. For example, the voting option is commonly used.