Highly collaborative and Visual Interface! Would recommend to any visual industry!
May 31, 2022
Highly collaborative and Visual Interface! Would recommend to any visual industry!

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We use Miro as a shared platform to collaborate on the research phase of the architecture design process in a studio setting. This includes presentation material, research flows, and visual planning.
Pros
- Presentations
- Visual Research Flows.
- Collaborative work.
Cons
- Increase in media formats able for upload - including GIF animations and TIFs.
- Easier media transferability between teams and accounts.
- More pre-made templates.
- Increased ease in remote collaboration.
- Increased presentation appeal.
As a student, I use Miro almost daily for my architecture Studio processes. It has allowed our team to work visually remotely very easily.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
We frequently use Concept Board for collaborative products as well, but I find the interface limiting visually and a lot more cumbersome to work with.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation