Item: Miro
Rating: 1
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Miro was brought in to support collaboration within teams but has become rarely/never used since the learning curve turns people off. Most people just end up using the same collaboration tools we have been using for years.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Cons

Learning curve as compared to tools people are already familiar with.
How to share boards with your team.
Explain how the product actually works.

Return on Investment

Purchase of another tool that will not get much use.

Implementation Rating

Ease of Integration

I was not a part of the integration team for this product.

Collaboration

Since this is not approved for all sensitive data types, it has not done much to help teams collaborate.

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Miro again?

Other Software Used

Quip, Webex Meetings, Box

Likelihood to Recommend

Collaborative whiteboards are not as useful as management thought they would be. Also, it is non-intuitive how to share boards with the correct people in your team. Overall, people have just continued to use the same old collaboration tools that we have always used. Miro is also not approved for any sensitive company data/projects, so teams are also staying within the same approved platforms to avoid sprawling across several applications for data sharing.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Expected more.