Paradigm Shift in Collaborative Design
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
As an educational tool for University level students of architecture and for projects with clients.
Pros
- Organizes information visually
- Gives everyone a 'front row seat' for critical reviews of projects
- Highly facilitates design conceptualization with drawing, copy/past, multiple simultaneous users
- Maintains a record projects that can be easily accessed later
- Organizes large sets of visual information in a manner easy to navigate
Cons
- Sometimes when I try to draw, I only get a dot, no line. It can happen three or four times before lines are able to be drawn.
- I would like to copy frames without taking the content so I can start a fresh board with the frames but leave content. Currently have to copy and then go in an erase all the content.
- More scale in thickness of drawing tools would help - add thicker lines.
- Reduced time by limiting redundancy
- Improved communication and collaboration
- Improved ability to go back and review and organize work
- So much faster to see everything rather than have just file names to wonder what is inside
Primarily this is for education - students can see others work and add theirs any time. In my office, clients can visit and see updates at their convenience. Then when we come together, multiple people can sketch add notes, drop content of relevance, etc. This is an outstanding tool.
Miro is the best collaborative, content organizing platform I have ever used.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation